A lot has changed since digital came around in 1999. Film has always been about quality – all kinds of it, too. It was about resolving power – we have Fujichrome Velvia for that now; it was about color accuracy, which also suits the former as well as, say, Fujicolor Superia Reala; or, for those who want sharp and vivid, there‘s always the beautiful Kodak Ektar. Now, however, there’s one kind of film for all those purposes. Just as film was finally providing the quality, the age of digital sensors came. And, some think, wiped film‘s quality ambitions off the table as if it were dust. We now have one film that can do everything – low light, color accuracy or vividness, sharpness and endless manipulation possibilities. One film that fits all.
One big news that nobody seems to be paying attention to at the moment due to the much-anticipated Canon 5D Mark III release, is the Canon 600EX-RT Speedlite announcement. Why big news? Because it is the first flash unit (speedlite in Canon language, speedlight in Nikon language) that actually has a built-in wireless radio capability. Historically, both Canon and Nikon used flash units that would communicate wirelessly only via infrared signal. While infrared works fine in some environments, it has problems with daylight (sun rays), range and it often requires direct visibility. Because of this problems, many photographers, including myself, have been relying on external radio transmitters and receivers such as PocketWizard for a more enhanced and reliable communication between flash units.
With the introduction of the Canon 600EX-RT flash unit and the Canon ST-E3-RT transmitter, Canonites no longer have to rely on third party radio triggers for reliable communication between flashes. Now you can use all flash features, including TTL flash and trigger up to 15 wireless flash units at a range of 30 meters, without worrying about potential communication issues. Considering that Nikon has had a lead on the flash technology for many years, it is surprising to see Canon release a radio flash first. The bad news for Nikonians is that Nikon has recently updated its high-end flash line with the Nikon SB-910, so we might not see a Nikon flash with radio capability any time soon…
These are the same Canon 5D Mark III image samples as the ones presented on Canon.jp. I am providing these images here just in case Canon websites go down due to too many requests, while serving millions of visitors today and the next few days. All EXIF data is attached to the original images, additional data is provided below.
Please keep in mind that the below images are taken in JPEG format, straight out of the camera. No other editing has been done, including sharpening!
Please note that neither B&H, nor Adorama will charge your credit card until the camera ships.
- B&H Photo Video – Canon 5D Mark III for $3,499 (body only)
- B&H Photo Video – Canon 5D Mark III with Canon 24-105mm f/4L for $4,299
- B&H Photo Video – Canon 600EX-RT Speedlite for $629.00
- Adorama – Canon 5D Mark III for $3,499 (body only)
- Adorama – Canon 5D Mark III with Canon 24-105mm f/4L for $4,299
- Adorama – Canon 600EX-RT Speedlite for $629.00
Canon 5D Mark III has been officially announced by Canon. See the previous coverage articles – Canon 5D Mark III vs Canon 5D Mark II and Nikon D800 vs Canon 5D Mark III. Pre-order links to B&H and Adorama have already been posted on the bottom of the page.
Here is the full press release:
How does the Nikon D800 compare to the newly announced Canon 5D Mark III? In this article, I will show the specifications of both cameras and talk about feature differences, in addition to providing my subjective opinion about each camera. Please keep in mind that the information below is purely based on specifications and available information. A detailed comparison with image samples and ISO comparisons is provided in my D800 Review.
Now that the Canon 5D Mark III is almost out (see Canon 5D Mark III Specifications), I am sure many photographers will be interested in seeing feature differences between the now obsolete Canon 5D Mark II and the new 5D Mark III. In this Canon 5D Mark III vs Canon 5D Mark II comparison, I will write about the specifications of both cameras and talk about their differences. Please keep in mind that the information below is purely based on specifications. A detailed comparison with image samples and ISO comparisons will be provided once I get a hold of the Canon 5D Mark III.
Canon is releasing the much anticipated Canon 5D Mark III on March 2nd, a major update to the existing Canon 5D Mark II camera that was released back in 2008. The 5D Mark III is a very interesting and appealing update, because Canon decided to keep the resolution of the camera about the same – 22.3 MP sensor, versus the 21.1 MP sensor on the 5D Mark II. This is a very different move compared to what Nikon did with its D800, which boasts a crazy high resolution of 36.3 MP, versus 12.1 MP on its previous generation Nikon D700. It almost seems like Canon and Nikon are reversing their roles, because Canon has always been pushing for a higher megapixel count, while Nikon has been focusing on better image quality, better autofocus and other important features. The Canon 5D Mark III specifications are indeed very impressive – seems like Canon is finally listening to its large customer base. The AF system went through a complete rework and the camera now has 61 focus points, up to 41 of which are cross-type. The previous 9 focus points and 1 cross-type on the 5D Mark II sound like a joke in comparison. The Nikon D4 and D800 have 51 focus points total, 15 of which are cross-type. So Canon is way ahead in terms of AF specifications (that’s assuming that Canon finally addressed its AF problems). The continuous shooting speed has also increased to 6 fps (compared to 5D Mark II’s 3.9 fps and Nikon D800′s 4 fps) and the viewfinder coverage is now 100%, compared to 98% on the 5D Mark II. There are many other new features to talk about – see the detailed specifications below.
Here is a summary of the Canon 5D Mark III specifications:
- Sensor: 22.3 MP full frame sensor
- Sensor Size: 36 x 24mm
- Native ISO Sensitivity: 100-25,600
- Boost Low ISO Sensitivity: 50
- Boost High ISO Sensitivity: 51,200-102,400
- Image Size: 5760 x 3840
- Processor: DIGIC 5+
- Metering System: iFCL metering with 63-zone dual-layer sensor
- Metering Types: Centre-weighted, Spot, Evaluative, Partial
- Dust Reduction: Yes
- Weather Sealing/Protection: Yes
- Body Build: Full Magnesium Alloy
- Shutter: Up to 1/8000 and 30 sec exposure
- Shutter Durability: 150,000 cycles
- Storage: 1x CF slot and 1x SD slot
- Viewfinder Type: Optical TTL
- Viewfinder Coverage: 100%
- Speed: 6 FPS
- Built-in Flash: No
- Additional Exposure Modes: Silent and low vibration
- Autofocus System: Advanced 61-point high-density reticular AF (up to 41 cross-type points)
- LCD Screen: 3.2 inch diagonal Clear View LCD II with 1.04 million dots
- Movie Modes: Full 1080p HD with ISO 100-12,800, expandable to ISO 25,600
- Movie Exposure Control: Full
- Movie Output: AVI, H.264/MPEG-4 in MOV Format (Compressed)
- In-Camera HDR Capability: Yes
- Live View: Yes
- Camera Editing: Lots of in-camera editing options with HDR capabilities
- GPS: No
- Battery Type: LP-E6
- Battery Charger: LC-E6
- USB Standard: 2.0
- HDMI Port: Yes
- Mic Port: Yes
- Wireless: No built-in wireless, optional wireless accessory
- Physical Dimensions: 152 x 116.4 x 76.4mm
- Weight: 860g (body only)
- Price: $3,499 MSRP
Just wanted to let our readers know that I will be covering the Canon 5D Mark III release, similar to how I covered the Nikon D800 launch. So far I have only been covering Nikon and Sony products (more Sony camera and lens reviews on the way), but going forward, I will also be covering Canon DSLRs and lenses. I have been working on some big site-related projects lately and I will be posting some announcements later this month.
Does this Canon 5D Mark III coverage mean that I will be reviewing the upcoming Canon 5D Mark III? You betcha! While my primary focus will still remain Nikon DSLRs and lenses (hey, I am a Nikon shooter after-all!), I decided that I need to expand my scope to the competition. One of the biggest complaints that I get from many of our readers is that I only cover Nikon and it turns out that many of our readers shoot Canon. Hopefully this news will make our Canonite group happy!
While I am currently working on a couple of Sony camera and lens reviews, I decided to write a quick article on differences between in-camera and lens stabilization. As you may already know, Nikon and Canon are both big on lens stabilization, while other camera manufacturers like Sony and Pentax have been pushing for in-camera stabilization technology (also known as body stabilization). I have had a few people ask about differences between the two and I thought that a quick article explaining the pros and cons of each stabilization technology would be beneficial for our readers.