Overview
As you might have already seen on “Our Gear” page, I call the Nikon D700 “the best camera in the world”. Now before rotten tomatoes start flying my way from Canon, Sony, Pentax, Fuji, Leica, Phase One, Hasselblad, Mamiya and other brand fans out there, let me state that this is my opinion that is solely based on my needs. Let me explain. Yes, there are superb Nikon cameras with many more pixels and speed, and there are $40K cameras out there that can shoot 200 Megapixel frames. But when I look at a camera, I weigh in what is important for me first, then pay close attention to the overall price to performance ratio, instead of focusing on a particular feature. The Nikon D700 does not have many megapixels, or high speed, or high dynamic range or movie recording capabilities. In fact, if you look at its bare specs and compare it to all other cameras on the market today, it would probably fall into the “average” category.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (2560×1600).
So, what makes the D700 the best camera for me? In summary, it is the excellent image quality and high ISO performance, superb autofocus, large viewfinder, great ergonomics, weather-sealing, good speed, the not-too-bulky size and much more…a long list of good reasons at half the price of top-of-the-line professional cameras like Nikon D3s. Let’s take a look at these in more details.
1) Nikon D700 Specifications
Main Features:
- Nikon’s original 12.1-megapixel FX-format (23.9 x 36mm) CMOS sensor: Teamed with Nikon’s exclusive EXPEED digital image processing, the D700 delivers breathtakingly rich image quality.
- Continuous shooting up to 5 frames per second: Shoot at up to 8 frames per second with the optional MB-D10 Multi-power Battery Pack.
- Two Live View shooting modes: Choose from hand-held or tripod modes to suit shooting requirements.
- Fast, accurate 51-point AF with 3D Focus Tracking: Exacting autofocus precision, plus three Dynamic AF modes.
- 1,005-Pixel 3D Color Matrix Metering II: Legendary Nikon exposure accuracy aided by an onboard database of over 30,000 images.
- Nikon Picture Control settings: Advanced color control with 9 customizable settings and 4 preset options allow fine tuning of image appearance preferences.
- Broad ISO sensitivity up to 6400 and incredibly low noise: Super low-noise performance from 200-6400 ISO, with the added versatility of Lo-1 (100 ISO) Hi-1 (12,800 ISO) and Hi-2 (25,600 ISO).
- Three-Inch, super-density 921,000-dot VGA color monitor: High resolution with 170-degree wide-angle viewing, calibrated color and tempered-glass protection assure confident image review.
- Rugged magnesium-alloy construction: Along with extensive dust and moisture protection and a durable shutter mechanism tested to 150,000 cycles, the D700 merges pro D-SLR performance with expanded agility.
- Dynamic Integrated Dust Reduction System: Effective quad-frequency, ultrasonic sensor cleaning minimizes image degrading dust particles.
- Nikon’s exclusive Scene Recognition System: SRS further extends auto-exposure intelligence while also advancing white-balance detection and autofocus performance.
- Active D-Lighting with NEW Auto mode: Unique three-phase dynamic control to capture previously lost details in shadows and highlights while maintaining normalized contrast.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (2560×1600).
If you skip the typical Nikon marketing garbage above and look at the bare technical specifications, you will see that some of the D700 specs are far from being the best on the market. Yet if you look at the camera as an overall “package”, you will not find a similar competitive product at the same price point. What about the Canon 5D Mark II and the Sony Alpha A900 you might ask? First, read my Canon vs Nikon vs Sony article, then read the next paragraph.
Canon 5D Mark II is a superb camera for high resolution work and video; if you need the megapixels and 1080p movie capabilities, you buy the Canon 5D Mark II. Sony A900 is also great on megapixels and has in-body image stabilization, but performs poorly at high ISOs and has no movie support. The Nikon D700 has the cleanest images at low and high ISOs and comes with Nikon’s best 51-point autofocus system, but cannot record movies. I personally do not care about the movie functionality – I buy cameras for taking pictures, so the video/movie part is not important for me yet (just a nice to have). Resolution is not critically important for portraiture and wildlife – I prefer low noise to high resolution (unless high resolution can be down-sampled to reduce noise). As you can see, the D700 is clearly the choice for my type of shooting. So you should also weigh in what is more important for you, without forgetting about your existing investment in lenses, accessories and know-how. I hope this explains why I call the D700 the best camera in the world.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
2) Camera construction and handling
Like D300s and other higher-end Nikon DSLRs, the Nikon D700 has a full magnesium-alloy frame. The camera is built tough and will last a long time, if it is properly taken care of. My D700 has survived all kinds of abuse and I shot it in rain, snow, hot, cold, humid and dry weather. I also used it in deserts and sand dunes of California and Colorado with wind blowing sand on the camera at 40-50 miles per hour, occasionally reaching 60+ MPH gusts. I also dropped it a few times (once on concrete ground on its side, about a foot of drop) and nothing happened to it. The D700 survived it all and it is still alive. The only thing that happened to it over the course of three years, is the rubber on the back started peeling off recently as I described in my “Nikon Quality Assurance” article a couple of days ago:
Many of the labels on buttons on the left side of the LCD are also gone, but I am not surprised – after-all, I have been abusing this puppy for over 3 years now. Other than that, the camera is built like a tank.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
Handling-wise, the D700 is also excellent. It is slightly heavier and bulkier than the Nikon D300s and has almost exactly the same layout on the front and back, except for the viewfinder area on the back that is borrowed from the Nikon D3. The buttons and controls on the camera are intuitively positioned so that you can quickly get used to them. Except for the top rotating dial, I often change camera settings without looking at the buttons. The camera fits great on hands and balances well with most professional Nikkor lenses.
As for the MB-D10 battery grip, I have one and use it when I need the speed and more battery life. Since I also shoot with the Nikon D3s, I already have bigger and more powerful EN-EL4a batteries, which I frequently use in the MB-D10. On the negative side, when you attach the MB-D10 to the D700, the camera becomes bulkier and heavier than the D3/D3s/D3x cameras. That’s why when Lola shoots with the D700, I remove the grip, because it is too big and too heavy for her. I wish the Nikon D700 had dual card slots like D300s or D3s cameras. It would be nice to be able to shoot into two different cards for fail-over or overflow. I guess the D700 update will have a dual card feature, since even the Nikon D7000 has that capability.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×948).
3) Camera Sensor
What can I say about the legendary Nikon D3 full frame sensor? Yup, that’s exactly what the D700 has. Currently, the only Nikon sensor that is superior to the Nikon D3/D700 sensor can be found on the Nikon D3s camera. As I have shown in some of my tests before, the difference between the Nikon D700 sensor and the Nikon D3s sensor is roughly 1-1.5 stops. Still, the D700 produces amazing results at high ISOs that even the most current Nikon DX sensors like D7000 cannot match.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1131).
4) Autofocus Performance
I remember reading the D700 press release when the camera was announced by Nikon back in 2008. Like many other photographers, I was surprised to see Nikon use the same Multi-CAM 3500FX 51-point AF system found on the D3, instead of putting something slower or inferior. I ordered my D700 as soon as B&H started taking pre-orders, mainly because of the autofocus system and the sensor. Although the Nikon D300s also has a 51-point AF system, it is not in the same league as the AF system on the D700/D3/D3s/D3x cameras. It is both slower and slightly less accurate in comparison (especially in low light). I know that some bird and wildlife photographers will argue with me on this one, but if you have used both D300/D300s and D700 side by side for fast action photography, you will surely notice the difference. In addition, the FX viewfinder is so much larger than any DX viewfinder, that it is easier to see if your subject is out of focus. Talking about the viewfinder, since the D700 has an integrated sensor cleaning system (Nikon D3 did not have one), the frame coverage got reduced to 95%. This means that what you see in your frame is roughly 5% smaller than what you will get in the captured image; I take that in mind before composing shots.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
All in all, and I know most pros will agree with me on this, Nikon’s 51-point AF system is still the best on the market today.
5) Metering and Exposure
What about metering and exposure accuracy? While the Nikon D700 features the older 1,005 pixel RGB metering sensor, which has now been replaced by the new 2,016-pixel RGB sensor found on the D7000, I personally like it better than the new one. As I have described in my Nikon D7000 review, the new 2,016-pixel RGB sensor can be tricky to work with, especially if you are used to the 1,005 pixel RGB sensor. The new face recognition patterns, along with the new complex sensor system seem to prioritize skin tones more, often resulting in over-exposure. I mainly shoot in 3D Matrix metering mode (about 90+% of the time) and occasionally in spot and center-weighted metering modes. All three have given me great exposures on the D700 in normal lighting conditions. When the light is tricky, I usually use exposure compensation to get the result I need. There are times when I dial +1 EV and shoot like that for a while and there are times when I dial -1 to -2 for the best exposure. But that does not happen very often – the metering sensor on the D700 is usually very accurate.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
6) Shooting Speed (FPS) and Battery Life
Without the MB-D10 battery grip, the Nikon D700 is capable of shooting 5 fps (frames per second). In comparison, the Nikon D300s shoots 6 fps (in JPEG and 12-bit RAW mode) and Nikon D3/D3s/D3x shoot 9 fps. The 5 fps speed is plenty for most photography needs, but wildlife and sports photographers have the option to purchase the MB-D10 battery grip to increase the speed of the D700 to a whopping 8 fps – almost as fast as the top-of-the-line D3/D3s/D3x cameras. To get to 8 fps, however, you will unfortunately need to either use alkaline batteries, or purchase an additional BL-3 chamber cover with an EN-EL4a battery that is used by D3/D3s/D3x cameras. Another $150 worth of extra expenses. Unfortunately, the MB-D10 does not come with the BL-3 chamber cover.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
The Nikon D700 is juiced by the EN-EL3e battery, which is almost twice smaller and twice lighter than the EN-EL4a. Unfortunately, it is also four times less efficient – the Nikon EN-EL4a can get up to 4300 shots on a single charge, while the EN-EL3e is rated at 1000 shots max. Starting from the Nikon D7000, the EN-EL3e is now replaced by the more efficient and compact EN-EL15 battery, so the D700 replacement will most likely have the same EN-EL15 battery. The MB-D10 battery grip has also been replaced by the MB-D11 battery grip that takes EN-EL15 batteries. The larger EN-EL4a won’t fit inside the MB-D11 though, so I am not sure if Nikon is planning to provide faster performance with this battery grip on the upcoming D700 update.
7) Dynamic Range
The dynamic range on the D700 is excellent. If you expose your subject correctly, you can recover a lot of details from both the bright and the shadow areas. Many of my landscape images were corrected using simple tools like Fill Light and Graduated Neutral Density filter in Lightroom and I was able to recover a lot of information, especially out of 14-bit RAW files. DxOMark claims the D700 to have 12.2 EVs of dynamic range, which is higher than the dynamic range of the Nikon D3s and any of the Canon DSLRs. The site also claims that the new 16.2 MP DX sensor on the D5100/D7000 has higher dynamic range than any previous Nikon DSLR, putting it second on the list of all cameras tested by DxOMark (including medium format). While the latter sounds too good to be true, I will not argue with DxOMark’s tests, since they have lab data to back up their information.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
My field tests have proven that shooting between ISO 200 and 800 is quite acceptable without much loss of dynamic range. Anything beyond ISO 800 will decrease dynamic range dramatically, especially beyond ISO 1600. So when I shoot landscapes (often hand-held), I try to stay below ISO 800. When photographing people and wildlife, on the other hand, I do not hesitate to crank up ISO all the way to 3200 and sometimes even to 6400. There is some loss of detail at ISO 6400 though.
See the next page to see more examples of D700′s ISO performance, along with comparisons against Nikon D300 and D3s.
ISO Performance
8) ISO Performance at low ISOs (ISO 200-800)
Some technical junk:
- White Balance: Auto
- EXIF information is preserved in the images
- Focusing was performed through Live-View Contrast Detect
- Long exposure NR: Off
- Image Format: RAW/NEF
- Imported images into Lightroom and cropped to 100% – no resizing was performed in Photoshop
- Lightroom export: sRGB JPEG Quality 80
Here is the full image, showing which area of the image I cropped below:
Let’s take a look at how the Nikon D700 performs at low ISOs. Here are some crops at ISO 200, 400 and 800:
As I have pointed out before, the Nikon D700 produces noise-free images at low ISOs. If you compare the above crops, you will barely notice any difference, even between ISO 200 and ISO 800.
9) High ISO Performance (ISO 1600-6400)
High ISO performance is a very important measure of DSLR sensor quality for low-light photography. Here is how the Nikon D700 performs at high ISO levels between ISO 1600 and 6400:
ISO 1600 adds a slight amount of grain when compared to ISO 800. I would not hesitate to use ISO 1600 on the D700 as well and if noise bugs me, Lightroom’s built-in noise reduction would get rid of it. At ISO 3200 we are seeing a noticeable amount of grain, especially in the shadows, but the image is still quite usable with plenty of details. ISO 6400 looks even more grainy and details are clearly getting lost. Getting rid of noise at these ISO levels would require a more selective noise reduction algorithm, so software like Noise Ninja or Nik Software Dfine would have to be used for best results. See my “Photo Noise Reduction Tutorial” for examples of selective noise reduction.
10) High ISO Performance “Boost” (ISO 12800-25600)
Nikon D700 has two extra ISO “boost” levels – ISO 12800 and ISO 25600 for extreme situations. Take a look at these:
As expected, there is too much noise all over the image at ISO 12,800 and ISO 25,600 is even worse with too much chroma/color noise. I personally never shoot at these ISO levels, because the amount of noise and discoloration would make it necessary to convert images to black and white. If you are looking for a grainy black and white look that resembles film, it is better to shoot at lower ISOs, then use software to add the grain.
10) ISO Performance Summary
The Nikon D700 yields very impressive, practically noise-free results between ISO 200 and 1600. There is a noticeable amount of grain at ISO 3200, but the image retains plenty of details, so it is perfectly workable for most situations. When I photograph wildlife and I need the highest quality, I set my Auto ISO maximum to ISO 1600 and I get plenty of details of birds, their features and feathers. ISO 3200 adds more visible grain, but I still use it in very low light situations. I would rather have a sharp, but noisy image, rather than a blurry noise-free image. Noise can be cleaned up in post-production, while blur and lack of details destroy photographs. As for other ISO levels higher than 3200 – I try to avoid them as much as possible. Overall, the low and high ISO performance of the D700 sensor is very impressive.
It is hard to judge the performance of the Nikon D700 without direct comparison against other professional cameras, which is why you should definitely check out the next pages of this review. Let’s see what kind of a difference there is between the Nikon D300s (DX), the new Nikon D7000 (DX) and the higher-end Nikon D3s (FX). Click the next page below to see the comparison.
Camera Comparisons
Compared to Nikon D300s
Please note that the camera comparisons are only based on image quality. Additional information and differences in camera features is provided in my Nikon D700 vs D300s article.
There is no such thing as a fair comparison when you put an FX sensor against a DX sensor. A larger sensor means larger pixels, which translates to cleaner images. I know FX vs DX is always a heated debate, with plenty of people defending each side, but for me – the low ISO performance of a full-frame sensor was something that made me permanently switch to FX. I was simply never happy with noise showing up even at base ISO on DX sensors. Everybody talks about high ISO performance difference between FX and DX, but people rarely show examples of low noise of the FX sensor at low ISOs. Below you will find comparisons at both low and high ISO levels between D700 and D300s. Please note that ISO 200 is the base ISO for both D700 and D300s.
11) Nikon D700 vs D300s ISO Comparison at low ISOs
Let’s see how the D700 FX sensor compares to the D300s DX sensor – take a look at the below crops at ISO 200, 400 and 800:
At base ISO 200, the Nikon D700 has very smooth and clean shadows, whereas the Nikon D300s has a little bit of noise that is particularly visible in the shadows.
At ISO 400, the D700 still has a clean and noise-free image, while D300s is already showing plenty of noise in the shadows.
With ISO level boosted up to 800, the amount of noise on the D300s is significantly higher than on the D700, but the details are not lost.
12) Nikon D700 vs D300s High ISO Comparison
What about high ISO levels above ISO 800? Let’s take a look:
ISO 1600 is very grainy on the D300s, while the image from the D700 adds a little bit of noise. We are starting to see loss of details on the D300s.
The D300s image at ISO 3200 looks unusable to me, while D700 still has plenty of detail to work with. D300s lost a lot of colors and dynamic range too.
At ISO 6400 the amount of detail loss on the D300s is significant. Colors are off and lots of dynamic range is lost. See how much better the D700 looks in comparison.
13) Nikon D700 vs D300s Summary
It is hard to explain the difference between FX and DX until you see image samples at different ISOs, including base ISO. While D700′s full frame sensor produces very clean images from ISO 200 to 800 even in the shadows, D300′s crop sensor already shows some amount of noise at ISO 200. The difference between the sensors increases even more as ISO levels are increased. The ISO 6400 crop from the D700 looks slightly worse than the ISO 1600 crop from the D300s, so there is roughly a 1.5 stops of difference between the two. I was never happy with the image quality of D300/D300s above ISO 800, while I do not hesitate to use ISO 1600 and even ISO 3200 on the D700. Obviously, the difference between FX and DX sensors is much more than noise levels. There is a significant different in field of view, dynamic range, colors, etc. Again, see my Nikon FX vs DX article for more details on differences.
Compared to Nikon D7000
For this test, I shot a target at a close distance without changing camera to subject distance (which is why images from the D7000 look slightly bigger in size). How does the newest high-resolution DX sensor from the Nikon D7000 compare to the D700′s FX sensor? Let’s take a look!
14) Nikon D700 vs D7000 ISO Comparison at low ISOs
Just like the D300s, the Nikon D7000 is showing noise at ISO 200:
The difference is even more noticeable at ISO 400:
At ISO 800, noise on the D7000 is very similar to that of Nikon D300s and the D700 looks much cleaner, practically noise-free in comparison:
When compared to the Nikon D300s, the new Nikon D7000 has 4 more megapixels of resolution, but retains around the same amount of detail and noise.
15) Nikon D700 vs D7000 High ISO Comparison
Let’s see how the Nikon D7000 compares against the D700 at ISO 1600:
Once again, the difference is pretty clear – the Nikon D700 is much cleaner at ISO 1600. What about ISO 3200?
The situation at ISO 3200 is very similar to that of ISO 1600 – Nikon D7000 is showing plenty of noise in comparison, just like the Nikon D300s.
ISO 6400 is my threshold on the D700 for worst case scenarios where I need to use a high ISO. D700 is still much cleaner than D7000 and it certainly retains a lot more details in shadows and highlights.
ISO 12,800 and 25,600 look better on the D700, but still unusable on both cameras as far as I am concerned. The amount of noise, detail and color loss on both cameras at these ISO levels is significant.
15) Nikon D700 vs D7000 Summary
Once again, comparing a cropped-sensor camera to a full-frame camera is never an apples-to-apples comparison. I decided to provide the above crops simply as a reference, for people to see how the new D7000 compares against the older D700 full-frame DSLR. Yes, the Nikon D7000 is a superb high ISO performer when compared to other cropped sensors given its higher resolution, but it still is not in the FX league in terms of noise handling, especially at low ISO levels. Even downsizing images to 12 MP on the D7000 does not result in the same clean look FX gives to images. Just like with the D300s, there is still more than a stop of difference between the two.
Compared to Nikon D3s
What about comparing the D700 to the current low light king, the Nikon D3s? Let’s take a look.
16) Nikon D700 vs D3s ISO Comparison at Low ISOs
The Nikon D700 produces noise-free images between ISO 200 and 800. Here is a head to head comparison between D700 and D3s at ISO 200:
I cannot see any difference between the two. What about ISO 400:
Still the same story, the images look almost identical.
The same goes for ISO 800 – again, both cameras are excellent between ISO 200 and 800. Finally, here is ISO 1600:
At ISO 1600, both still look great, but the Nikon D3s image looks a tad cleaner in the shadows.
17) Nikon D700 vs D3s High ISO Comparison
The battle begins at ISO levels above ISO 1600. Here is ISO 3200:
Now the difference is clear – the Nikon D3s has less noise at ISO 3200, especially in the shadows:
At ISO 6400, the difference is significant – take a look at the shadows and the figurine on the right side. If my maximum workable ISO level on the D700 is ISO 3200, on the D3s it is raised to ISO 6400.
ISO 12800 is unusable on the D700 due to the significant amount of noise and loss of colors, while it still looks OK on the D3s.
And the difference is even more significant at ISO 25600 – look at the figurine on the right side and note how much detail is lost on the D700, while D3s still preserves most of it.
Nikon D700 is maxed out at ISO 25600, while D3s can push it all the way to ISO 102400. I never shoot at ISO levels above 25600 on the D3s, so the performance at these ISO levels is not important for me.
Now here is a bonus/fun comparison. What if we compared the Nikon D3s against the Nikon D300s? Take a look at these crops:
When I look closely, the image from the Nikon D3s actually looks sharper than the image from D300s, which means that there is even more than 3 stops of difference between the two. In addition, despite the fact that I used the same color profile, white balance and saturation levels on both images, the image from the D3s has better colors.
18) Nikon D700 vs D3s Summary
As you can see from the above image crops, the Nikon D700 is on par with Nikon D3s at low ISOs between ISO 200 and ISO 800. Starting from ISO 1600, the Nikon D3s shows better handling of noise in the shadows. The difference grows as ISO levels are increased. At ISO 6400 and above, the Nikon D3s shows roughly a stop of difference and this difference slightly increases at ISO 12800 and above. Take a look at ISO 51200 on the D3s and compare it to ISO 25600 on the D700 – the D3s looks better and retains colors. Obviously these kinds of extreme ISO comparisons are not very useful for most photography needs and I personally avoid shooting at ISO above 6400, but it is nice to know that the D3s could save a picture if the lighting conditions are extremely poor.
Summary and Image Samples
19) Summary
Now that you have seen some of my and Lola’s photographs that were shot with the D700 and image crops comparing the camera to other Nikon DSLRs, you hopefully understand why the D700 is our favorite camera. We have had it ever since it was announced in 2008, and it has been our workhorse camera since then. It has over 220,000 thousand actuations, which is well above its 150,000 actuation warranty and it has not failed me once. I am planning to use it till it dies, even if a D700 replacement is announced this year.
What about the D3s that I also shoot with – why am I not calling it the best camera? In addition to its steep $5K price, the D3s is a specialized camera for fast action and extreme low light photography. It is a fast, rugged, heavy camera and it is not for everyone. The D700, on the other hand, is smaller, lighter and less intimidating than the D3s. While it does not have the same performance characteristics at high ISOs, it is still a phenomenal camera that produces noise-free images at ISOs 200-800 and very acceptable images at ISO 1600 and 3200. Most of our work is done at low ISOs anyway and I try to use a tripod when photographing landscapes, so the high ISO advantage of the D3s only comes in handy when I photograph birds and wildlife. The Nikon D700 is also a great travel camera. When I travel overseas, I leave the D3s at home and take the D700 without the battery grip instead, mainly because of low weight and size. Lola also prefers to use the D700 during weddings, because she quickly get tired when she uses the heavier and bulkier D3s. As for the speed difference, the MB-D10 can almost compensate it, as long as the right type of a battery and battery cover is used. The key word for the Nikon D700 is “value”. The Nikon D3s is almost twice more expensive, but it is definitely not twice better. The price to performance ratio of the D700, in my opinion, is much better compared to the D3s.
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
20) Where to buy and availability
B&H is currently selling the Nikon D700 body only for $2,699 (as of 08/21/2011).
21) More image samples
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×687).
Click here to download the above photograph in a large wallpaper format (1920×1200).
Many more image examples from the Nikon D700 are available in the Wallpapers section of the website. Most images from Lola’s wedding blog are also taken with the Nikon D700.
About Nasim Mansurov
Nice to read. I love my D700 and in reading your article I have nowhere explored its capabilities. I look forward to many years to come.
I have never found the MP count lacking, and the colour reproduction is fabulous and like you, I have no desire to make movies..this is my camera.
My partner is looking at the 5DmkII, primarily as it is lighter than the 700; but that would concern me for build quality. Wish there was a full-frame Nikon which was lighter, I like the weight and the robustness….but she simply finds it too heavy.
Thanks for the review…look forward to your review of the D4 and D400 when it is finally released. I will wait and may not purchase the D800 when it comes out…I am quite satisfied with my D700. I can only hope Nikon resists the urge to over-featurize the camera…focus on what matters.
Steven, if your partner finds the D700 heavy, she should try holding the D3s :) It would be nice if Nikon released a cheaper and lighter camera with an FX sensor, but I am afraid it is not going to happen any time soon…the 5D Mark II is an excellent camera though!
Looks like we won’t see any new camera announcements this month. If it doesn’t happen in September, then we will have to wait until Q1 of 2012.
I admire the valuable information you offer in this Nikon D700 Review. I will bookmark your blog and have my children check up here often. I am quite sure they will learn lots of new stuff here than anybody else!
It’s so confusing to me when all these new NIKON hit the market! I have a NIKON D-90 & have been shooting with this for awhile now & would really like to upgrade. I love shooting landscapes, portraits, group portraits (family), flowers & animals when the moment occurs. I have several Nikon lense for my Nikon D-90, so I’m looking to purchase a NIKON that will work with my lenses already. From reading about the D700, I’m thinking this is what would benefit me to upgrade to. Can you suggest a NIKON for me?
THANKS,
LAJEAN
The D700 is the best camera I’ve ever owned since the Nikon F. It meets all my photographic needs from portrait to landscape to still-life. I’ve used it to take pictures of historical tapestry and had them enlarged to 20×30 at Costco with no noise or unsharpness. (Note: Don’t laugh at Costco. The cost was $9, and it was printed on Fuji Crystal Archive paper. Flawless.).
I only have one problem with the D700: it’s so good I’m going to have a very hard time justifying the purchase of a new camera (e.g.D800). I know the D700 has only 12.1 MP, but I also know that 99.9% of us don’t need anymore than that. So there it is. It cramps my camera-lust needs, but not my photo needs.
Peter, don’t read about any new camera announcements for the next few years and your NAS will fade away :)
What is worse than NAS is NOCD – Nikon Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.
There is no know long-term cure for this disorder except taking large quantities of Pino Grigio during the introduction period of new Nikon products. Afterwards, the only know longer-term cure is continuous application of WCNS – Wife Continuous Nagging Solution taken 5 times a day.
Stay the couse. Wait 6 month and buy from B&H and address it to your son. Mom’s never challenge their sons. MSN – Mom’s Secret Weakness.
Great article as always! thank you for the review. Please correct section 20 of the article – D7000 to D700
20) Where to buy and availability
B&H is currently selling the Nikon D7000 body only for $2,699 (as of 08/21/2011).
Thank you for pointing out the typo Obed, I fixed it :)
Great review. I am a D90′rs and contemplating D800 arrival. But… my needs is so much like yours in that D700 is already good enough.
Great articles. Thumbs up!
Alex, you won’t be disappointed with the D700 for sure!
Nasim, thank you for posting such a great review! I’m very excited about the D800, but I’ve been curious about your thoughts on the D700. Your reviews are just terrific, and they have guided/will guide my future Nikon purchases.
I have just one issue with your D700 vs D7000 comparison, which is that you didn’t include a sample photo or a discussion of the D7000 at its base ISO of 100. In your review you noted that according to DxOMark, the sensor in the D7000 (also found in the D51000) outperforms the D700 in dynamic range, but you left out that the D7000 also outperforms the D700 in noise, tonal range, and color sensitivity at ISO 100. For tripod users and bright light shooters, this is important to know.
Thank you for your feedback Matt! The D7000 at ISO 100 might be better than D700 in total range and colors, but definitely not in noise. While images at ISO 100 have a very slight grain on the D7000, the D700 produces grain-free images. This has to do with pixel density and size.
Great review!! Nikon D700 is indeed the best camera in the world for me as well! As you rightly pointed out, every photographer has it’s own “best camera in the world”. Mine without doubt is D700 – I have two of them and had been doing wedding photography almost since they came out.. I can’t wish for a better camera! It’s amazing and delivers every time!
Thank you for your feedback Martins! My wife also thinks the D700 is the best camera for weddings :)
I was actually on the fence about getting d700 this late in its product life cycle. But your review finally convince me that this is really a none issue. I’ve ordered mine yesterday at 70% of the usual retail price :)
Moving up from d80 since 5 years, and d7000 a mere 6 months (I’ve sold off my d7000 to another user) – switching to a proven d700 really makes sense since I now owned only fx lens (24-120 f4 and 85 f1.4d).
Can’t wait for my d700 to arrive. Cheers.
Thank you a lot Nasim; as a D700 User I am very happy to read the “better late the never review”;
Very good section about noise performance comparing D300s/D7000; And as you pointed out Noise is also an issue for DX for ISO <= 800; I love the clean images of my D700 and come to the same result;
will use that cam till it dies;
/Karl
You are most welcome Carl, thank you for your feedback..
for me the Nikon D700 will become as famous as the Nikon F4 – a legendary cam in future.
-> Hall of fame!!
/K
It has been documented in a recent popular psychological magazine article (sample size 10,571) that people who bought the Nikon D700 have an intelligence quotient (IQ) of from 120-140. That puts us in the “Very Superior Intelligence” range far beyond the Canon population very top norms.
While we should be kind to our lost Canon brethren, we should also enjoy our enlightened position in the camera world. What is our proof of superiority: We own the best DSLR in the world!
LOL Peter, that’s pretty funny! :)
Hi Nasim,
your reviews are always great, keep them coming!
Small comment: I would replace the fake picture of the D700 with a real one (it’s clearly visible that the one you posted is a photoshop combination of a D3 viewfinder and a D300 body).
Best,
Roland
Roland, where did you see a fake photo of a D700? There is no fake photo here…I would never do that.
At the very top of the review. It looks like the picture that amazon.com has for the D700, which is also not a true representation of the camera.
amazon.co.uk and amazon.de, on the other hand, have a correct picture of the camera.
Wow Roland, thank you so much for pointing it out. I don’t know where I got this image from, but it sure is fake! I got the good one from NikonUSA.com and replaced the image.
You are welcome!
I like the high quality of your reviews and thus thought I should mention this.
All the best,
Roland
I upgraded from a D90 to the D700 in April after trying to hold out for months for the D800. After the earthquake in Japan which damaged the Nikon factory that produces the FX bodies, I figured it would be forever before an official announcement was made. Best of all, the D700 body went on sale for $2,299 (in Canada!…our stuff is always more expensive than in the US) which was a $200 savings from the regular price. At the same time, B&H had just increased their price to $2,699. Gotta love a good deal! No regrets. I love using it. The D3 would never be a consideration for me as I already find the D700 quite heavy (I have a slightly sore right wrist most of the time). I’m using my old, old D40 for a couple of weeks, mainly with the 50mm f/1.4 lens and it seems so teeny, tiny and light compared to my usual D700/24-120mm f/4 “walk-around” combo.
Jane, you are absolutely right! I am now 90% confident that we will not be seeing a D700/D3s replacement this year, so why not take advantage of great deals now?
Thanks Nasim for your brilliant review. Your reviews are best to me as you are a real-world, hands- on photographer with imagery that I find very appealing. I’m in the process of selling some 4×5 equipment with the purchase of a D700 in mind with the money. Your review of this camera may have tipped the scale in favour of my following thru on this purchase.
Thank you for your feedback Michael! :) I am sure you will not be disappointed with the D700. It will allow you to take pictures you could not take before with your 4×5…the ISO performance of the D700 is excellent.
Great review as always! I’ve been telling myself to hold on to my D90 and wait for the D700 upgrade coming end of this month. Hopefully the new body will shine once again.
Cheers
Hi Nasim,
Nice review and yes the d700 is one of the best cameras in the world. I’ve own mine for the past two and a half years and it’s been great. Can’t wait to see what nikon comes with next because of the achievements they made with the d3s sensor. I really hope nikon starts to produce they own sensors to keep they superiority in the photography world because Sony is knocking on they door. Waiting on sony sensors is killing them. Nikon d3, d3s and d700 are nikon made sensors and they are among the best sensors ever made. Hope they pass on the technology to the lower end cameras especially they upcoming mirrorless camera. But I need your opinion on whether you use the active d-lighting or you turn it off? I also got the same peeling off rubber to the back, will just use super glue to fix it. Thanks and awaiting a response to my question.
Also Nasim,
One more thing, I know you shot raw files but what i fine is the color gamut from nikon cameras changes when upload and is ready to process in lightroom or adobe. Do you get that same issue? I also readed that using Capture nx reveals and retains the best portential of the nikon nef raw files. What’s your take on that? I think thats on of the reasons I still rather shot jpegs becuase I like the results i get from jpeg then process in lightroom3.
i just picked up slightly used D700 and wondering what wide angle prime lenses you recommend? I have a 50 1.8 which after using it on a D70 for past couple years, seems so different on FX. Love your outlook on gear.
p.s. I just read you review of the 24 1.4 and although it siunds stunning, i was wondering about smaller and cheaper lenses as well. is there an older wide with manual focus that you’d recommend?
Hi Nasim,
Brilliant review! I can’t seem to decide between Nikon d700 or Canon 5d MkII. I’ve read Canon’s metering and white balance is better than Nikon, but Nikon shines at ISO performance. Canon 5d is cheaper than Nikon d700. Which is the winner?
Andreas, it depends on what you want to do with either. If you are into landscapes, the 5D Mark II might be a better candidate due to higher resolution. For photographing people or anything else that moves, the D700 is better hands down.
Agree with you about comparing the weight and size of D700 with D3S. This is the reason I have D700 and not D3. Thx for review, it’s very well done. ;)
You are most welcome!
Hi Nasim,
I was just curious about your AF preferences with the Camera. Do you always use dynamic AF? I find it hard not to use just the single central point (when using single-shot AF), but I also get the feeling that I’m not exploring my camera’s capabilities when I do so. How do you like to work?
Regards,
Luiz
Luiz, have you seen my Autofocus Modes Explained article?
Yes, thank you! I guess I´ve been using it properly, at least according to your article :)
D700 and 5dm2, which one give a better sharpness for landscapes?
Hi John,
I own a D700 and have already worked for quite some time with a 5D MkII. IMHO, the one that gives you better sharpness is a sturdy Gitzo tripod and Arca/RRS ball-head :)
Seriously, though, they´re both very sharp and have great dynamic range. The question you should be asking yourself is “how big do I want to print?” I shoot mostly street photography and the D700 is a killer tool for that. It´s got less resolution but the files are cleaner at higher ISO´s (which I use quite often) and that (plus faster/more effective AF) gives the D700 an edge over the MkII.
For landscapes, though, AF and high ISO performance shouldn´t matter much on top of that sturdy tripod… Therefore, I´d say the 5D MkII would have an edge over the D700 if you want to go fine-art bigger than A4.
Thank You Nasim for this and other truly great and sincere reviews you put the effort into providing us all with. I agree with You on the D700 being the best camera out there, hands down. If I was only a bit hesitant to get my new D700 late last August with all the hype around the upcoming D800, now almost 5 months after owning this camera and having shot in the Nevada and California deserts, Japan, and lastly the Chilean Atacama high plains, I’m now fully convinced this is the best value-for-money still photography instrument out there today.
After just having read what “seems to be” the firm basic spec-sheet for the upcoming D800, my conviction that the D700 will be one of Nikon’s all-time greatest cameras is even more solid.
The D700 mates really well with the “walk-around” 24-12o F4, is a low-light bliss with the 50 1.4G, and makes the most out of the decent “bang-for-buck” Sigma 50-500 OS zoom. I’m longing for the day in February when I’m scheduled to go get the new 16-35 F4 lens to complete my base lens team for this fabulous camera.
All the best,
Sixto
Hi Nasim,
As usual, great review :) I currently have a D7000 + 17-55mm + 85mm f1.4D + 35mm f1.8. I’ve been eyeing for long now the D700 and would like to know if it’s worth getting one now since D800 is arriving soon. My plan is to get let go the D7000 and the DX lenses and that leaves only the 85mm for D700. I shoot portraits mainly and once a while some landscapes so I’m planning to get a D700 + 50mm f1.4G. Btw, I love my 85mm f1.4D till death although it’s a little hard to get fast focus on the D7000.
If the rumors are true that D800 has 36mp, then I’d find It might not be of great use for me since I need more post-processing power, and it might not be great in low light anymore. What do you think?
Thks in advance :)
Lee
Thank you for this great review Nasim. At this moment i still have my old d2x and my d300. I was thinking off selling my d300(i still love my d2x in low ISO,s and colours) and buy a d700.Afther this review i am shure to buy a d700.
Regards
William
William, you won’t be disappointed with the D700!
I’ve been enjoying your bird photos and reviews of equipment, and had a couple questions, if you don’t mind too much.
I was curious as to whether it’s still worth it to save up for a d7000, even though it is DX? I’m not exactly on a student budget, but it will take me some months to save up for even that – and I’d rather like to get the body, a Nikon 70-300mm lens, and a Nikon 50mm f/1.4 AF-S + accessories (bag, memory cards if need be , etc) by the end of the summer which is when I head to Japan for a couple years for my job.
I’m definitely not a professional photographer and currently only work with a Sony DSC-H3. I’d like to move up because I’m a young birder who’s getting a little frustrated with taking “almost perfect” pictures like this. Mainly, I want to be able to take my unnatural luck with getting close to birds and turn that into pictures I can really zoom in on.
Of course, I’m trying to ask this question on birding forums that deal with camera equipment and photography forums that deal with the birding urge, but it’s starting to get incredibly confusing. There are those who tell me “you’ll only get a decent bird picture with the d700 and this lens (which happens to cost about $2,000).” Then here I am looking at flickr groups that use a d90, a d300, a d200 that take often pretty good or even professional photos and of course there are my decent pictures with a “baby camera” posted -right there- in the first post. Sorry if I seem a little frustrated.
I’m just looking for some advice from a professional photographer who might understand that I’m moving into serious hobbying, and likely not selling my images.
Thanks for reading my questions and I encourage you to keep writing and posting reviews.
Chelsea, the Nikon D7000 is a great camera for any photography, including wildlife photography. If your passion is bird photography, then I would recommend to get something better than the 70-300mm lens. If budget is an issue, I would get the Nikon 300mm f/4 lens, which will deliver superb results, as noted in my “best lenses for wildlife photography” article.
Wildlife photography, especially bird photography, is a very expensive hobby to have :)
sir, i would like to know wich is the best camera for studio photography? is it d700 or d-800
Sir, i use the Nikon D90, but my heart beats for a full Frame Camera (but not my money pocket) just have ben watching a demonstration from th new D800 it’s a great camera, but if you dont’t really won’t video i think the differences are not so great with the D700, i print pixtures not greater then A3 plus so i think about price/quality the d700 is a great choice. I also read your test about the new Nikor 28 -300 mm fulframe lens. Because i not wont to spend my whole fortune (it’s not so great) i think i go for a this 28 -300 mm lens and the d700. Have ben thinking about the D7000 but your test tells me not to do so,( D700 versus D7000). Have the DXO optics pro 6 software maybe this software can make the lens default from the 28 – 300 mm correct. Can you advise me a little bit about this mather
Thank You
Sorry for my englisch !
Don’ have to tell you that your picture are great !!!
John,
I formerly shot a Nikon D80 with an 18-200 all purpose zoom lens. When I upgraded to a Nikon D700, I purchased their 28-300 lens to give me the same combination I had before. Big mistake. The 28-300 certainly delivers on its promise of an all purpose walk around lens but cannot give you the quality results you get with a better lens. The D700 is made to give you a high ISO for low light shooting and a large sensor for sharp quality pictures. The 28-300 doesn’t have the optical quality to match the camera.
If budget is an issue, I would suggest you go with a Nikon 50mm 1.4 or 1.8 lens to start with. It’s half the price of the 28-300 and will give you outstanding pictures and the ability to shoot in extremely low light. You can shoot in low light with the 28-300 but need to use a higher ISO. You can shoot in low light with the 50mm 1.4G but at a much lower ISO delivering better quality to your pictures. It allows you to tap the full potential of your D700 camera. You’ll quickly fall in love with your D700 camera. I now have two.
Happy shooting.
John Adams
Yep,,, My new nikon D700 just arrived,, Again Nasim, thank you for this test,,, i,m one happy guy ,
What a great camera
Regards
William
Just bought a D700 yesterday when the price dropped. Also have a D7000. Will be interesting to compare the two. Have been using a FX 70-200 2.8 on the D7000 for high school sports, can’t wait to try the D700.
Thank you, Nasim, for this great review. I recently replaced my D80 with the D700 and it’s as fine a camera as you’ve described. I really enjoyed seeing your photos too!
Regards,
Mark
Got mine yesterday brand new as the price dropped. Will get the D800 four years later, if its worth its hype.
hello! i have to ask you what camera settings do you use in d700 for a wedding for example and what settings do you use daily ? thank you!
Hi Nasim
Thank you for your review and all the other helpful articles. I wasn’t sure whether I should wait for further price reductions, or rumoured new models e.g. D400 or D700s, etc. In the end, I considered the D700 for what it is and always will be and felt that it has most things I need, and the things it lacks don’t really matter so much. I’m moving up from a D90, and wanted better low light performance, more advanced AF, shallow DOF capability, large viewfinder and pro body – all of which the D700 has. I got a mint used D700 with 12 months guarantee for £1600 on 6 months interest free credit. Sure, I probably could have bought it for less elsewhere, but it seemed the right deal at the time and I’m glad I made the “jump”. Will be saying a long goodbye to my DX gear that has served me well.
Just had to say thanks. As per usual I’ve spent many happy hours (most wasted) looking for honest reviews. Ref D700. I’ve just been to a local camrea club talk by a guy who like tavel and wont use anything else but a bronica sqai and slide film. some of you pictures using the d700 at full size on my lap top are more than a match to the 2 1/4 (6cms) image at the same size. I can say this as I to would only use an SQA for weddings until I gave up whilst my cjhildren are growing up.
Regards ,
Geoff Bell, Bristol UK.
Sorry fo typos in above comments.
Really sharp and deep quality. will purchase it soon.
Hi Nasim.
i had a dream for this one for long time but now that d800 has came out,it changed my determination a lot.
im using d7000 right now and shoot in low light a lot. im thinking of full frame because of it’s low light performance. every photographers that i asked their opinion for d700 said that i should wait for the successor of d700 (like d800 or the rumored d600) because of the technology which d700 used is dated due today’s camera standard. For d800 itself,i dont think could afford it with the price around US $4000 in my country.
So i’m hoping that you could give some advice about this. If I upgrade d7000 (newer tech) to d700 (Older tech),would I get significant result differences between those two? (Assuming that I use same lens and techniques) Or should i wait d800 (or d600) to drop its price?
For the same amount of money,i have another alternative for my camera investment. Would it better if I buy 70-200 vr II (with d7000) instead d700? both have same price here.
thanks for your answer
Steve, the D700 is a huge upgrade over the D7000 in terms of high ISO performance, AF and other features. There are many happy D700 owners out there and people have been buying it on the cheap, since a new D700 is only $2,199 in the US and you can snatch a used one for as low as $1,500.
Hello Nasim
Well, I picked up a D700 this past week and although I have not had an opportunity to take many photos with it, I am enjoying it and the body feels both well made and a nice weight to it. I had the D7000 and although a great DX camera, I found I did not use the many scene settings and programs anyway and I never used the video functionality but twice just to try it out.
I think I will enjoy the D700 and glad to see how yours has taken a beating and still producing some fantastic images as you have demonstrated on your site. Hope all is well my friend.
Jonathan, always nice to hear from you buddy! The D700 is a huge step up from the D7000 – congratulations! My D700 is still kicking butt and I won’t part with it until it dies :) Even then it will probably serve me as home decoration, LOL!
D700 Firmware Update A 1.03, B 1.02 is released is it worth ?
any bad results ? anything ?
Sam, upgraded mine and everything works great – so far so good!
thanks i might do it in few days :D
thanks for such instant reply!
Nasim, Thank you for your excellent D700 review. I had a D90 and now I’ve a D700. Please let me know if you have a list of settings for D700. I would like to review to see I did ok in settings. I enjoy reading your blogs. It helped me a lot to understand the photograpy better.
Dear Nasim,
I do follow your post regularly and it is indeed a good source of knowledge. I am a wedding and documentry photographer from India. So far I was renting out FX bodies for comercial shoots.
I have a specific questuion for you, I want to buy Nikon D700 considering the D600 could be a downgrade version of the same genre. I want to have good low light performer, hence good ISO performance and more corsstype focus are what I would need.
I do not want to buy D800 since I do not need 36 mega pixels (I think 16 mega -20 mega is perfect for me) and eventulaly I would need extra storage (which I do not like).
I have almost made my mind for D700, but thought of taking your opinion on this.
Is it a good decision to buy D700 , which is permanently discontinued now?
What are the probelm I might face if I buy D700 (which is old) than D800 or D600(which are new).
Basde on my style of photography, am I making a wrong decision? or possibly missing somethnig while taking the decision?
Please help.
Thanks
Sagar
I have posted elsewhere on your site about trying to decide between the D700, D800, (the rumoured) D600 or even a D4.
I shoot catwalk and concerts and my SOLE concern is low light work. I have no need for video at all. I was tempted to hold off on the D700 and wait for it’s successor. Trouble is, I’m not sure there will be one, at least not anytime soon. Nikon seem to be going for MP in the D### range and low light in the D#.
The D800 definitely isn’t the successor. Too high in MP and no better (IMO) in low light. The D600 will be good I’m sure, if its specs are as reported. But I think it will be entry level and the inclusion of video IMO will surely result in cost cutting to hit the price point being talked about. Part of that will be achieved via the body type I think. As for the D4, I’d love one. But I’m no full time pro and while that extra 1 to 1.5 stops would be benefit sometimes, it’s simply not going to be needed often enough to warrant double the cost of a D800, and over 3 times the cost of a new D700 (currently).
The impression I get is that maybe the D700 ticked too many boxes and sold too well, at the expense of the D3/D3S. I have a feeling don’t intend to replace it for that reason. If you want vastly improved high-ISO performance, at the moment it seems the D4 is your only choice. The D800 is only as good as the D700 so I really can’t see that D600 beating the D700 simply because it will draw sales away from the D800 for low-light users.
Maybe at some stage there will be a D800S or whatever but for now I think that’s it. So I’m pretty much decided on picking up a D700 this weekend, while I still can.
Dear Nasim ,
For thirty years I used my analogue Nikon FE, which I loved! Also loved developing my own films, doing my own darkroom-work. In 2009 I replaced my FE (hesitantly) with a Nikon D200, which I thought (very silly!) I could use for just as many years as my first camera.
I now would like to replace my D200 with a full frame camera and buy the 28-70 lens for it.
I mainly use my camera to shoot my family, street photography, travel photography (Europe and Asia). Try almost always to use natural light, D200 has too much noise in high iso. The work I am doing is not near anything a pro is doing, but I am quite serious about it. I am not interested in a video-camera at all (have a HD Panasonic and rarely use it), don’t want huge files (D800), but would love to have a camera that I can take out in any weather type (D600 might not be weather sealed and rugged enough).
Should I wait for the D600 or another D700 successor? Would it be a mistake to replace my D200 (old technology) with another ‘old’ camera (D700)? Sometimes dreaming about a Leica M9 but it is too expensive for me (especially the lenses). Still own a Leica M3, my dad bought one ten years after WOII.
From what I read, a D700 would meet my needs, I just fear it will be ‘old technology’ in one or two years, just as my D200 is now.:-)
Could you please advice if I should wait for half a year (or more) for Nikon’s latest FX cameras or that I should go ahead and buy the D700.
Yes, I know the decision is only mine to make, but would love you opinion.
Love your website!
Kind regards,
Dianne, from the Netherlands (so please excuse my English)
Dianne,
I agonised over this for weeks, doing almost nothing but reading review after review, discussion after discussion. My main concern is low-light performance. There were several contenders for me.
The D4 would have been superb but I don’t need the FPS rate currently nor the other bells and whistles which result in this body having a $6K price tag. I tried to source a new D3S but no joy and I wouldn’t favour used here.
I also considered the 800. Superb in many ways (100% VF, native ISO 100, great DR & dual cards) etc etc but I just really didn’t feel comfortable getting it because of many aspects of the D800 I feel I’d be coping with rather than wanting, or more importantly, enjoying. Importantly, many say the 800 is only as good as, or possible a little better (if you down-sample) than the 700 at high-ISO. Here there is a price difference of $1,000 between a 700 and an 800 and for that difference I would want better high ISO performance, and better with ease, not the hassle of down-sampling and the 80MB RAW file size.
What I also considered was that outside of the D3/3S, a year ago the 700 was the best Nikon you could buy and is used by thousands of people, prop and amateur alike. It was, and is, being used for the same purpose I intend to put it and photo shooting environments change little. If the D700 was poor in those areas OR if the 800 was a direct 700 replacement (trouncing it in low light without having to go through down-sampling etc) I would have gone for the 800. As it stands, the 700 does exactly what I need and does it cheaper than it ever did before. I’m also dubious about ageing tech but in some cases I feel it’s irrelevant. If the 700 was ageing and didn’t do the job, or had been replaced by something that does it better (in the same price bracket as the 700/800) I wouldn’t have chosen the 700. But neither of those two apply. I’d have even gone for the D4 at a push but it has much functionality I don’t need and the extent to which it pushes high ISO above the D700 to me isn’t worth $4,000 more, for some it might be, but I dare say they would also need all the other bells and whistles too.
The D700 seemed the right choice for now and maybe in the future it will get a direct replacement which I will consider. Now though, I’ll be happy enough with the 700 and know that I don’t need to jump on any replacement that immediately surfaces until the price reaches a point I like and, more importantly, until the major glitches in production(if any) and / or software have been sorted. Even then, I will keep the 700.
I picked up my 700 2 days ago for $2,000 with a 16 GB high speed Sandisk card and spare battery, irresistible considering what it would have cost a year ago. I would ass that with the 24-70 lens (my preferred FX lens) it really is superb.
Adrian, thank you for your thoughtful and detailed reply. Most of your sentiments are exactly the same as mine. :-) Makes it easier to make to right decision (for me).Very helpful, thanks a lot!
Dianne
Welcome. I’m glad I got the 700. Perfect for me without the hassle of dealing with 36MP sensor RAW files from the 800.
I suspect a replacement for the 700 could well be some time off yet, another year maybe, IF they replace it. Many people are waiting for the 600 but I don’t think that will replace it either.
If they do replace the 700, I’d hope it would be 16 – 18 MP and very good in low light, at least 1-2 stops better. Given the problems with the 800 and D4 I’d probably wait at least a year to buy it so these production problems could be ironed out and for the price to drop. The D700 was $2,999 on release, then the price dropped to a low of $2,350 but I think that was not for long. It seemed to hover around the $2,700 mark mostly. So it could be another year or two before the 700 replacement would make a sound purchase decision for me. Having the 700 now, I’ll be in no rush in any event.
same thoughts here
Hi Diane
I’m an serious amateur photographer, like yourself, focused primarily on family, landscape and general walk-around photography. I shot film with a Nikon F100 for many years and was extremely happy. I finally converted to digital with a Nikon D80 when it was introduced and shot with it for a long time. I upgraded to my first Nikon D700 when it was first introduced along with a Nikon 24-70 2.8 lens. As an old film guy, I was anxious to get a full format sensor. I’ve been so happy with my first D700 that I purchased a second one as a back-up when the prices dropped. I purchased a 50mm 1.4G lens with the second body for low light capability when shooting indoor pictures of my grandchildren.
The D700 reminds me of my old F100 in many ways – look, feel, performance. Like the F100, it’s one notch below the top professional Nikon cameras but delivers all the professional features an advanced amateur would want and use in a camera. The biggest advantage with the D700 for me is the amazing low light performance. I purchased a Nikon 50mm 1.4G lens to go with my newer D700 for indoor family shots and pictures of our grandchildren. You can shoot pictures in a closet with this combination. Most of my printing is in the range of 4×6 prints up to and including 11×14 prints. The detail and quality is great for everything within this range.
I’ve had no problems whatsoever with my first D700. It’s an extremely sturdy camera with good weather sealing so you can use it under all weather conditions. My outside shots are primarily with my 2.8 24-70 which is also weather sealed so I’m covered to shoot in all conditions. A side note on the D700 and 24-70 lens combination is that it’s fairly heavy combination but more than makes up for it with the quality images. I originally bought the 50mm 1.4G lens with my second D700 for indoor shots of family but now find myself using it more and more for general walk-around photography. It’s light and compact so I don’t mind having it around my neck for a long time.
Many people do, but I’ve never been one to worry too much about dated technology. If the camera does what I want, delivers good pictures and holds up mechanically, I’m a happy guy. I also like the comfort of knowing one camera well and using it all of the time.
You may have already purchased one by now but, if you haven’t, I think you would be extremely pleased with a Nikon D700.
John Adams
Hello John, Adrian and all,
Thank you for taking the time to reply!
Planned waiting just a little longer before making the final decision between D600 and D700 (was leaning towards the D700, a lot!!)…. but had an irresistible opportunity.:-)
So yesterday I bought a used D700 (only 1574 clicks!), plus a nikkor afs 24-70 F2.8, nikkor af 80-200 F2.8 D ED, nikkor afs 50mm F1.4, plus MB 10 and a flashlight for a very good price. All with original boxes and bills, everything looking just perfect -not to be distinguished from new- and lenses and camera rarely used.
Am over the moon with my new gear. Looking forward to getting to know my new camera and lenses and taking pictures, instead of compulsively scanning gear forums for too many hours.
Husband and teendaughters will be relieved.:-)
Thanks everyone for all the friendly and helpfull advice, love the ‘tone’ on this site and forum!
Dianne, the Netherlands
Wow, Diane. You hit the jackpot. You now have professional grade equipment to take great pictures in any situation. As you know, I have a D700, a 24-70 lens and a 50mm 1.4 lens so I can tell you from experience that you have outstanding lenses to match your new camera. The 80-200 is also an outstanding lens. You have a great deal of fun ahead of you getting to know your new equipment. You’ll be absolutely amazed at the number of creative options this camera offers you. I’ve owned my D700 for two years and am still exploring its true potential and learning.
Like yourself, I’m a big fan of Mr. Mansurov and his website. After I spent some time getting used to my D700 and lenses, I invested in a good quality tripod at his suggestion. If you don’t already have one, it will be worthwhile investing in one. The D700 with the 24-70 or 28-200 lens attached is a heavy load for shooting by hand. I followed the guidelines listed in the article on this website about selecting a good tripod and it has done a great deal to improve my photography.
After you get used to your equipment, you may also want to read Mr. Mansurov’s article on this website about checking the focus on each of your lenses. You sometimes run into an issue where a lens is focusing in front or in back of your subject. Your D700 allows you to adjust each lens to bring it into perfect focus. I had to do this with my 24-70 lens when I purchased it.
Enjoy your new equipment and keep in touch. Photography and this website are a great bridge for sharing ideas, meeting new people and making new friends. We’d love to hear from you.
John Adams
Hello John, Yes, feel so lucky to have found such a great deal. Didn’t dare to dream about it before but husband insisted I’d buy this gear. (smile)
Been trying the 50mm 1.4 lens on the D700 these past days and am blown away by the results. Don’t know (have to start testing the other two lenses yet) what can be attributed to the D700 and what to the new lens, but the difference from my D200 and 18-200mm is simply amazing.
Good advice about a new tripod, wil certainly look into that! Have an inkling my thirty year old (heavy as lead) Velbon might not be the best choice anymore. :-)
Thanks again for all the encouragement and advice! All free time is now spent on taking pictures, reading manuals and guides, refreshing photography techniques etc. instead of scanning forums about camera’s.:-)
It’s a pleasure (especially compared to many forums) reading this site!
Dianne
I have had a D3000, D7000, and purchased the D700 when the price dropped. The former are great cameras but the D700 is phenomenal. No one will regret the purchase. I have since sold my dx lenses and bodies and not looked back.
but, you will need a good lenses to feel the difference!
i made a mistake and bought mediocre lenses… don’t do it, buy one, but good lens!
Yes you are correct. Good choice to use nikon lens only. I use 50mm 1.8g nikon a lot. Was less than $300.
Hello, I’m from Italy with a brand new D700. I can use the grip of my old D300, so it has the same feeling, same layout, I also have my 8 fps like before but with better buffering. I really don’t need 36 MP if down to 4 fps! I would need a 18-24 MP reflex with 8 fps. I obviously can’t get the D4. So my choice has been a new D700, only 1800 Euros: the image quality improvement is visible, high ISO performance surceases the D300, I have at least an FX camera, I have the best zooms so I think I’ve done the right thing, BEFORE reading this forum, which confirms now my impressions. D600 seems to have a body not to be considered, for now I’m ok with my D700: may be technology goes on, but what was perfect some month ago couldn’t become ready for the thrash now…
Sorry “high ISO performance outclasses the D300″
Hi Nasim,
I love your website and visit almost daily! I want to ask, I’m stuck between getting the D300 or D700. I know they are in two different categories completely but I don’t know which to get. I love nature/landscape photography so full frame would be nice. But the lenses are very expensive. Do you think I would benefit from getting a D300 or the D700 more? Anyone can answer, and thanks so much for your time!!!
Tim, go for the D700 without a doubt.
Okay, thank you very much!
Dear Nasim,
Read this d700 review with interest. My current dillema is that I an due to replace my d300 after 5 good years. I own this plus an F6. I am therefore looking to take the next ‘technology leap’ on the digital side. I shoot everything so versatility is key and i have some really good glass . I like the pro feel and ruggedness of the bodies I have and wondered if you have any simple guidance on an FX purchase.
Thanks
Fraser
I love my D700 and it severs me very well for what I do,mainly weddings and portraits. Even with the arrival of the new D800, I can’t justify upgrading as the benifits aren’t quite worth it to me. Yes, the D800 has a 36megapix sensor, but that means file sizes will be about 36mb each! I’m already eating up 16-20 GB per wedding with a 12.1megapix sensor. If you’re a pro then you need to think about these things, yes hard drives are large these days… but everything has to be backed up! It all adds up, you have the option to to downsize the files… but why buy a D800 then?
If you’re a wedding photographer like me, the D700 is still the one to get! You can see some of my work on my website, all shot with the D700:
http://www.clickclackphoto.com
Dear Nasim, I have just completed a decade long journey from film to digital – F80 to Coolpix, D80, D300 and F100 ( just to try film once again ) and now D700. During recent years your site has given me well informed, balanced advice & opinion which I could not find elsewhere. I drove the D300 for four years & really love the camera, although there were times, particularly in low light interiors, when it let me down. My recent dilemma was whether to wait for the D600 or buy a mint D700, After reading your reviews & posts I chose the D700, even though it was hard to resist the lure of very high resolution images. However I also use the Sigma DP1, and I know there is a lot more to sensor performance than the number of megapixels. So now, after a month or two, I am delighted with the D700 and know I have a camera which will match & outperform film performance for many years. Thanks. PW
Paul, the Nikon D700 is a phenomenal camera. I decided to keep mine and use it till it breaks. Don’t look back. Shoot with it until it dies, it will create beautiful images for you for years to come, you can trust me on that. I am very happy with my D700.
08/10/12
Thanks Nasim, a great & positive reply. Totally in accord with my feelings ! Paul.
Насим, доброго времени суток!
Подскажите пожалуйста, стою перед выбором: D600 или D700. Оба хороши, первый аппарат это новизна и современные технологии, а второй с отличными характеристиками проверенными временем (это АК-47 нашего времени!). Но D700 был выпущен в 2008году. Сейчас у меня D90 :((. Снимаю людей, часто снимаю детей.
Удачи!
It was a long wait for the D600 to be announced.
No doubt that it is a great camera and a wonderful product from Nikon. When I first held it, it did not feel quite a like a D800 or D700. It feels more like the D7000, which is a terrific DX camera in it’s own right. The new FX sensor on the D600 is fantastic as Nasim points out in his review. But, with all those MP’s, I felt like some top-end glass was justifiable and the bill grew close to 5 digits. A great camera, but for a first serious DSLR… Could I do with “just” a D700?
So, in the end, and with the help of this article, I decided to look for the elusive D700. I was lucky and found a minty used copy (1500 actuations). I managed to include the new 24-85 zoom, new 50 1.8G and the SB700 for the price of a D600 kit plus a couple hundred dollars. Forgive me while I gloat, but, I am so very happy with the D700. Image quality is just ‘Wow’, that’s all I can say. There is certainly more than enough room to grow with this kit for a beginner like me.
I just wanted to thank Nasim, Lola and the many brilliant writers here on photographylife.com for all the great advice and helpful nature.
Now I just hope I don’t get a bad case of NAS, but if I do, I will be back here to share the feeling.
Thanks!
What a magnificent camera this is !! It just continues to blow my mind with the quality of the images it captures ! I don’t need huge megapixels, I don’t want video, I just want a great camera to get superb shots and to be able to swap lenses with my F100. Finally, finally I’ve got there. ..it was a long journey; thanks again Nasim for your pointers along the way !
Great review. Just picked this camera up as it hit near the $1,000 price point in the used market. Finally a full frame professional camera that helps me stay with what i know in terms of shooting and lenses choice.
I know that auto focus is nice at times and so is 8 fps if that is what the shoot needs. However, most of the time i am slow, i take my time and don’t mind focusing and thinking while i shoot. Now i can get some superb Nikkor optics for hundreds instead of thousands of dollars, doing it at full frame digital with great dynamic range and metering in a camera that can travel with me where ever i go and in any environment. Its a rugged instrument from which one can receive images from another world.
Great comment John,. I think that with the passage of time, we will look back to see the D700 as one of the great landmark cameras – pre still/video confusion. I’m glad I got mine, in as new condition, just before the production line shut down !
Hi,
I’ve been a great fan of your website for information related to camera reviews and photography in general. I need your advice in deciding whether or not its still a good time to go for a D700. The reason why I wish to upgrade to a FX is that I want better picture quality (I currently own a D90 with its kit lens 18-105 but am not always satisfied with its pic quality, a 50mm F1.8 that I absolutely love and a recently acquired Tamron 90mm F2.5 (yes, thats one of the oldies I got for a deal on eBay)). I would rather buy a moderately used D700 and save up for a couple of good glasses than spend a fortune on a D600. I don’t do videos either.
I consider myself an enthusiast and I believe in better photographs straight off the camera rather than spending hours in post processing. Also, I still haven’t found my favorite genre of photography – but I do like to get better portraits, macros and landscape/cityscapes.
Any comment is highly appreciated and thanks in advance.
Regards,
Trishul.
Go for it, buy your D700.
I suggest it is a move you will never regret !
Take your time buying good FX lenses.
There are plenty of good offers around
Thanks Paul. I guess I just wanted some reassurance before going ahead and spending some crazy amount of money to fuel my “passion” :)
Trishul,
Some of the greatest joys in life follow the fuelling of our passions;
and then going on the wild ride to see where they lead us ! Is this case your D700 will transport you into another world of digital still photography. It’s a very exciting & rewarding ride…
Logo depois do lançamento da Nikon D800 ví que a Nikon D700 representava o fim de uma época. A família das grandes câmeras, nascida no começo deste século alcançou o topo da qualidade com a D700. Outras câmeras mais caras e mais sofisticadas virão, mas não terão a luz de eternidade da Nikon D700. A D800 pode ter em muitos aspectos alguma superioridade, mas falta alguma coisa que nos diga que esta maravilhosa máquina de imagens foi feita para durar. Em agosto deste ano (2012) comprei a D700. É a minha maneira de segurar o tempo com as mãos.
Teus comentários são ótimos.
Adilson Brilhante – Boa Vista – RR – Brasil/Brazil
Just sold my D7000 last week and picked up my D700 today. The guy who sold me the camera recommanded me this site. Very happy with the cam and this site.
Happy new year to all of you.
Hi, I have read your review of D700 and D600. I am about to change from D300s to fx, but I am not sure which to buy. A new D600 or a used D700? My first requirement is better image quality, espesially on high iso. Good image quality also when cropped is nice to have. Next is good building quality so I can use it in snow and rainy weather. I shoot landscape, micro/macro, nature art and birds, but also some action. I have a 70-200 VR1 2.8, a 105 micronikkor 2.8 and a 16-85 mm dx lense, and also a 1,7 tc II. I also have an old Nikkor 105 f2.5 manual focus lense which I would like to use more. Any suggestions what I should go for, an used D700 or a new D600, if money does not matter? Regards Geir :-)
Geir, I followed the same path as you from D300 to FX. I had precisely the same questions re D600 or D700 ? In the end I followed Nasim’s advice and bought a mint D700 and will be forever thankful to him for that advice. It is not ‘modern’ in the sense that it lacks video & super-high mp count,
but it has the most wonderful sensor & captures outstanding low light images. Rgds, Paul.
Thanks for feedback.. Which lenses are you using with your D700?
Hello Geir,
I don’t have the lenses in front of me as I write, but all are Nikkon FX, some I’ve had since the days I shot only on film. They are : 20mm prime, 50mm prime, 18/35mm zoom, 24/85mm zoom, 80/200mm zoom. They also work fine on my F100. Rgds, P.
Hi Nasim, I am regularly read your website. Currently I have NIKON D90. I am using it since last June 2012. Before that I had Nikon D60, I used it for 3.5 years approx. I want to move on Full Frame camera. Currently I have 2 options.
(1) Canon 5d used and
(2) Nikon D700 used.
Canon 5d is in my budget. If I can sell my nikon d90 then i have 5d with easy and I will buy 50mm 1.8 canon.
If I go with Nikon D700 then I have to invest more! (much more!) It have approx 18,500 shots (around 2 years old).
So please let me know which one to buy. and I am happy with my nikon d90 also :).
Here you can check some of my images with Nikon d90
http://www.flickr.com/photos/62898983@N03/
Thanks again!
Regarding D700. Which zoom lense would you reccomend as a primary lense for this body?
I use the 24-120 F4G on my D700. Although I have other great FX lenses including zooms and primes, this is the lens that I end up using over 80% of the time on my camera. It’s a very good all-round lens.
Hello again Geir,
My zoom lenses are all a few years old & I use them for specific tasks; so I would not recommend any one of them to you as a primary lens. Nikon has released some great new zoom lenses in recent years. I suggest that you read Nasim’s recent lens reviews & then make your call. Rgds Paul
Hi, I am about to buy a used D700 and wonder. Which of these lenses would give the best image quality on a D700:
Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f4.0G VR or
Nikon AF-S 24-85/3,5-4,5 G ED VR
Thanks :-)
Hello Geir,
if you follow S Sune’s advice you might go for the 24 – 120 ?
Also suggest you specifically ask for Nasim’s opinion.
Yes, but ig 24-85 is equal or even better regarding image quality, I would like to buy that, since it is half the cost :-)
There’s a thread on the dpreviews forum comparing the 24-85 to the 24-120 F4. Could be interesting to read the user opinions: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/41982608
Even with comparable optical quality, in my case, the 24-120 is worth the extra money for being better at the long end, having the extra 35mm range, and the constant f/4 aperture.
Now I am owner of a used D700 and a used 24-70/2.8 and so far it looks very good. :-)
hi nasim would like your advice please ,to left it to late to buy d700 new ,but a pro nikon dealer has one with 6 months warrenty nearly new for £1275 under 50,000 clicks but this seems alot to me .also for first lens with this thinking of the new 85.1.8g or 24-85 for portraits /walkabout lens . regards brian
Hi, I have a NIKON D-90 with several lens ,Nikon 18-200mm , Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G, Nikon 70-200, Nikon 50mm f/1.4G,Nikon 50mm f/1.4D, Nikon 85mm f/1.8G, .
Now, I’m wanting to up grade to the latest Nikon that will work with my lens I already have. Which NIKON camera would you suggest I upgrade to?
I’d like the latest?
Thank you!
well, it depends on your pocket :D
i do have d700 and it shoots awesome pictures.
D4 ist looking good
d800E looks good too.
Hello everyone,
I am an enthusiast sports shooter, focusing on my grandsons youth tackle football (indoor and outdoor). I need to upgrade from D80, and also plan to buy the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VRII lens which I sometimes rent. I am not concerned about video, and my budget is limited. I want to move to FX, and am wondering if the D700 is a good choice for sports? Has anyone bought Nikon refurbished?
This is a great site, I have learned a lot.
Is the D700 a relevant camera today now since the 600 and 800 are out? Or should I go for the older 700 ?
I am presently using a D40.I appreciate your help and the review here. Thankyou.
The D700 is a fabulous full frame camera, capable of producing great photography. This fact does not change simply because a new model with more bells and whistles comes out.
S.Sune is correct. The D700 is a magnificent camera – which may not shoot video, and may not have huge megapixels, but it does have a wonderful sensor and the ability to shoot really clean images in low light situations. A landmark camera in my opinion !
I bought a D700 in the fall of last year and it is a joy to use. The image quality is unique and definitely lets my photos stand out from the crowd. It’s low MP’s is perfect for work meant for the web (mainly what I do). Lowlight capabilities are absolutely stellar. My ONLY complaint, a slight one at that, is that ergonomically the new offerings have improved. The grip is slightly shallow, but, with the battery grip on, the problem becomes insignificant.
Beautiful camera, absolutely love it. I got the 50 1.8 and 24-85 3.5-4.5 for now. Saving up for some exquisite Nikkor glass to compliment lowlight work.
Happy shooting!
Great review Nasim need your opinion, I haven’t bought the D800 yet as I will buy it when i go to the States at the end of the year, for now Though someone is selling his D700 with 4000 clicks for 1,200 euro but now the D7100 will be available end of March, what would be the right choice? You think that the D7100 can match the D700 in IQ? Probably not since the D700 is FF, thanks
Chris;)
I’ve noticed that photographers sometimes seem divided between artists & technicians – who approach photography from very different perspectives.
I see it as a purely creative pursuit (thanks Romanas ) and my D700 with its lovely sensor & big fat pixels is a wonderful creative tool allowing me to explore and capture the magic where I find it.
I now have a Sigma 12-24 on my camera ( the technicians would be horrified – Sigma ! ) and this rig opens up a whole new world of low-light interiors – which I do a lot of.
For me the objective is to capture the spirit of the shot/scene/person, and this is MUCH more important than critical technical analysis or pixel-counting.
Hello Nasim,
could either you or someone on your team please help me. I am torn between either purchasing a Brand New D600 or try my best and find a Used D700 and hope that whoever is selling it is truthful about the condition and shuttercoount. I just purchased the Nikon 50mm f1.8 and the 24-120 f4. Or should i just go with a brand new D7000 until the dust issue with the D600 is fixed. Someone please help me.
Manny, I can’t really help you because I have never used either the D600 or D7000.
After reading Nasims reviews, and on his advice, I found a pristine D700 & have been extremely happy with the camera.
I suggest you read all the comments on the 3 cameras by Nasim, Romanas and other users,
then make your call depending on the type of shooting you intend to do.
Horses for courses.
I have D700 nikon camera and using Tamron AF 18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro lens
bus getting black circle around photograph I have talk to Tamron support department thay say’s this is full frame lens then what am I doing wrong? please advice me what to do
hi, i am not sure, but may be it helps,
in the settings of d700 you will find lens settings, which you can set to fx or dx.
try it
i hope this helps
You have been incorrectly advised:
Di II Lenses are exclusively for APS-C digital SLRs.
http://www.tamron.com/en/photolens/di_II_all_in_one/
You would have to shoot in DX mode, on the D700 that means you are shooting at 5mp!