What are the best Nikon lenses for wedding photography? This question comes up so often via comments and emails from our readers, that I was first going to include it in our Photography FAQ section, but then decided to write a separate article and elaborate on the subject a little more. Specifically, I want to not only write about what lenses I think are the best for weddings, but also why and in which cases we use a particular lens. Please keep in mind that the information I present below is a personal opinion based on my experience so far. If you have a favorite lens of yours for wedding photography that is not listed below, please feel free to add a comment on the bottom of the page with some information and pictures (if you have any that you would like to share).
1) Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S
The first on the list is my (and Lola’s) most favorite lens for wedding photography – Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S. We like it for four main reasons: it is sharp, colorful, lightweight and the bokeh it produces is outstanding.
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S
I have always been a fan of the 50mm primes. The older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D is also excellent, but the heptagon-shaped bokeh it produces is a little distracting, so I like the newer “G” version instead. On a full-frame body, the 50mm focal length is ideal and you can capture both beautiful portraits and full-size body shots if you stand a little away from your subjects. It works equally well on a DX body, but the focal length can be a little long, which is certainly a disadvantage when working in tight spaces. If I were only allowed to use one lens for weddings, I would certainly pick the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G. See a detailed Nikon 50mm f/1.4G Review for more information on this lens. Here are some image samples from it:
Nikon released a much cheaper, compact and lighter 50mm lens in 2011 – the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G. It actually performs better than the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G in many ways, so I would recommend to get the f/1.8G model instead.
2) Nikon 85mm f/1.4D/G
If you want the best-looking, creamy bokeh, check out the Nikon 85mm f/1.4G or the older Nikon 85mm f/1.4D, our second most favorite lens for wedding photography. Most photographers associate the word bokeh with this lens for a reason – it is the king of background blur. It is also one of the sharpest lenses from Nikon, producing outstanding results at maximum aperture of f/1.4.
Nikon 85mm f/1.4D
At maximum aperture the depth of field is so shallow, that if you stand too close to your subject and focus on the eye, the nose gets out of focus. I typically shoot between f/2.0 and f/2.8 for portraits and f/4.0 every once in a while if I need more depth of field. Lola also loves it and she has been using it a lot for her portrait sessions and weddings lately.
See my detailed Nikon 85mm f/1.4G Review for more information on this lens.
3) Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II
I got my hands on the new Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II as soon as it became available, because I knew that it would be much better than the old one, which I always enjoyed shooting with. The nice thing about the 70-200mm, is that it gives you so much focal length to play with.
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8G ED VR II
When you shoot with prime lenses like the Nikon 50mm or Nikon 85mm, you almost have to engage with people, because they will certainly note your presence due to your proximity. The Nikon 70-200mm allows you to capture subjects from a distance in their natural state, without drawing their attention to you. It is a very versatile lens and it works great with all Nikon teleconverters, if you feel that the focal length is not sufficient. Sharpness and color are outstanding at all focal lengths and the bokeh on the 70-200mm is also superb. The only complaint that I have about the 70-200mm is its weight – Lola never uses it because it is too painful to carry. Periodic shooting with this lens is not as bad, but I had a lot of back pain after shooting our last wedding with it all day long…not something I want to do again. Combine the weight of a pro-level body like Nikon D3s and it becomes one heavy combo. Check out my review of the 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II that I posted a while ago.
4) Nikon 24mm f/1.4G AF-S
If you want to see the sharpest Nikon lens ever produced, check out the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G! This gem has not been leaving my bag ever since I put it on my camera. I have been using it for all kinds of photography, including nature photography and weddings, and the 24mm focal length is very useful for full body and group shots or when working in tight space environments.
Nikon 24mm f/1.4G AF-S
While it is not designed to be a great portrait lens like the 85mm or 70-200mm lenses, it can certainly do the job quite well in the bokeh department with its maximum aperture of f/1.4. Just like other f/1.4 prime lenses, it is great for low-light situations, especially towards the end of the wedding when the amount of ambient light diminishes to very challenging levels. Check out my in-depth review of the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G if you have not seen it already for more information.
5) Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G
The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G has been one of my favorite lenses for landscape photography ever since it was released. While it is not as sharp as the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G and suffers from heavy distortion/vignetting between 24mm-28mm focal lengths, its versatility to zoom all the way to 70mm compensates for the problems. I rediscovered this lens when I started photographing people and I have been very pleased with the beautiful and colorful images it creates. It is certainly not a lens of choice for isolating subjects and creating beautiful bokeh, but if you stand close enough to your subject and shoot at f/2.8 and use focal lengths above 35mm, you will get pretty impressive results.
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G
The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G is a great lens for photographing full body shots and it does equally well when taking pictures of groups. I wrote a detailed Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 Review, comparing it with both Nikon 24mm f/1.4G and Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G.
We heavily rely on all of the above lenses for our wedding photography. When it comes to wide-angle lenses, I typically take either the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G or the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G, but not both. I know that many wedding photographers also enjoy fisheye and tilt-and-shift lenses for weddings, but I have not yet had much experience with them, so I cannot comment. If you have other favorite lenses for your portrait/wedding photography, please let us know in the comments section below!
About Nasim Mansurov
Hello Nasim,
Glad to see your wonderful article. I am a wedding photographer with
Nikon D7000 with 17-55mm lens and
Nikon D5000 with 50mm lens
I am trying to switch to FX format like D800 which is not available in Canada but I hope I will get it someday :) now I want to ask that in $2000 range, which lens would be better? I can also buy 70-200mm but m bit scared of its size and also its really irritates you when you walk around in wedding crowd with a big lens. As I dont know much about FX bodies and lenses, I seriously need your suggestion. I usually capture Indians and Muslims weddings where some colors are very prominent like red, yellow and Purple so I need a lens which capture colors in its natural state as well as with sharpness. I was thinking about 24-70mm lens, whats your recommendation?
Thanks for your time and yes, I will keep using 50mm for portraits
Get your self 24-70mm Nikkor. You will be very satisfied!
I have Nikon 24-70mm and 80-400mm lenses and I planning to buy 85mm 1.4G. Will it help me to cover or is it not necessary to buy.
I own Nikon 24-70mm and 80-400mm with D3x.
Right now think of buying 85mm 1.4G or 135mm.
Will it help me to cover some angle with it.
Which of it will be better 85mm 1.4G or 135mm with D3x
Trile.
It really depends what you are looking to do with the lens.
If you are doing weddings I would recommend the 105mm 2.8 VR. It doesn’t look like you have a macro lens.
For portraits the 85mm 1.4G might be better, but it really depends on your style and what you’re looking to do.
I use Nikkor 85mm 1.4D on nikon d700, it is amazing lens.
Anybody got his D800? :)
Hi,
I was asked to do a wedding and I only shoot for fun with a D90. If I wanted to rent all the lenses you talked about to experiment before the wedding, do they work okay with the D90? Or do I need to rent another body? Like the D5000 or D7000?
Thanks for your article! Any help/suggestions would be appreciated.
All the lenses that are recommended will work on the D90. Make sure to get them a few days ahead of time as it will take some time to get used to them. I would also recommend getting another body as well so you can switch from one to the other quickly. A D7000 would work well as it will be better in lower light than the d90.
Also, absolutely necessary is a good flash. Pick up a sb910 (rent). And practice with it as well. Flash is very difficult to use if you’re not used to them. You don’t wanna catch yourself fumbling with your equipment on the wedding day so make sure you have enough time to practice.
2nd thought – if the client has seen your work and your capacity you might be ok just taking photos with what you have. They know what to expect. Getting new lenses and new flashes that you’ve never used before might actually hinder and make things much harder for you on an already stressful day. Go with what you know. Save your money and pick up more flash cards and batteries perhaps.
Thanks.
Hi Nasim,
I was waiting to read your reply to my post a few days ago! Now I can’t even find my post on here -(
I shall ask again and this time I shall be brief :)
I have a Nikon D90 camera and I will be covering a wedding next month. I was wondering if I were to buy just two of the lenses mentioned above which those would be. I don’t have a budget for all yet. I would love to own a 70-200mm lens (the only deterrent being the size but thats a non-issue!).
I would really appreciate if you could advise.
Thanks for your time.
Regards.
hello…i do weddings from time to time..
with a DX format.
you need a 35mm f/1.8G ( seriously, you will NOT regret it ..it is made for DX (ie: you d90)!!!)
and if you still want the 70-200 but cannot afford it right now, then 2 choices:
1- rent one!
2- get an used 80-200 f/2.8d
also, get a Nikon 50 f/1.4D (very usefull in low light)
i do not use zoom (this my not my style of shooting)….but i do use the 35mm , the 50mm and a 85mm as well as a old manual focus 135mm f/3.5 (which i love!!)
i forgot to say..as DX, i use a couple of Nikon D200 and a D300
Christophe,
Thanks a bunch for the reply! I do already own a 50mm f/1.8 D. I am getting a 70-200mm and thanks also to your suggestions, I shall go and get the 35mm f/1.8G too. I hope that will take care of some of my assignments. I was debating over a 24mm lens mentioned above, but I think I will hold that out for now. Besides, I will be wearing my budget extremely thin anyhow.
I could use your view on that one, however.
Thanks again for writing. Appreciate it much.
I totally agree with it. Especially with the extraordinary 85mm f/1.4 G.
But I you want to make a complete, unbiased study, take a look at this Excel Comparison Chart :
http://www.photoexposition.fr/slr-dslr-reflex/
I’ve got an old D80 & 17-55mm f/2.8 and get good results from mobile portrait shoots. But, I’ve got a school prom coming up and will be shooting with a high key studio setup. I’ll be taking 3 shots: full, 3/4 & head shot. Do you think my gear is up to it or should I hire a D700 & 24-70mm f/2.8? Or what would you recommend?
Thanks for the opportunity to speak to a real pro.
Hi Alan.
It looks like you are using a studio type setup where the clients will be still, you can use a tripod, and you will use an abundance of light ( strobes or flashes). In this type of scenario you will be fine with your setup. The more light the less “work” your camera has to gather light.
On the other hand if you were taking pictures at the prom of people dancing in the low light you would benefit a lot from a D700 as the lighting will be low and there will be motion.
Good luck, you should do well!
Thanks Tomas, I never really looked at it like that.
This therefore gives me time to acquire a full frame: D600/D700/D800. What a choice?!
Thanks again.
Nasim, I’m looking to buy 24mm 1.4G but it is very expensive. At a typical wedding how much do you use?
I currently have 14-24 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8, 50 f1.4G and recently added 85 1.4G. My plan is to try and use more primes this year. I’m looking for a fast WA lens and considering 24 1.4G.
Would appreciate your opinion.
Thanks
Andrew
HI Andrew.
Its interesting as I have converted my whole setup to Primes as well.
You should study your style and the key photos you take at your weddings. Are you more prone to taking wide shots or zoomed in shots?
Also you are covering the 24mm focal range twice with your two zooms. If you are using a crop sensor you might want to keep the 14-24mm and sell/trade the 24-70mm. the 35mm 1.8G or similar would fit nicely there. With the extra money you could probably pick up another prime lens. I notice you don’t have a macro in your lineup which can be very beneficial in weddings.
Find out what works best for you and which two to three lenses you use the most.
Hope that helps.
Hi Tomas,
I currently use 2 x D700′s and have D800 on pre-order.
Recently I have been using 24-70mm and 50mm 1.4, zoom has been like a comfort blanket during the transition.
Which lenses do you usually use?
Thanks
Andrew
I used 2 D7000s myself.
That makes sense then if you use full frame cameras.
I used the 35mm 1.8 50 1.8 and 85 1.4 and the 105mm 2.8 Micro
I might pick up a 24 or 20mm but i don’t have a tendency to shoot very wide.
yes that’s how I felt before as well, but once I got my hands on the 85mm 1.4 and saw the bokeh, sharpness, color rendition i was hooked again. primes are so nice once you get used to them. and you always know what to expect when you look through them as they are fixed so you can pre-see your shot.
Good luck!
Andrew, if the 24mm f/1.4G is expensive for you, why don’t you get the new Nikon 28mm f/1.8G? I have not received one yet for testing, but I suspect it will be a superb lens, just like the 85mm f/1.8G.
I am considering 28mm f1.8G
Jared Polin has posted an early review here and looks positive:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hffe8D-Xqr8
Thanks
Andrew
Hi Nasim!
Do Nikon has any plans of upgrading its 24-70mm f2.8 lens with VR technology in near future as Tamron has already announced its 24-70mm f2.8 lens with VR technology.
Syed, as far as I know, Nikon is planning to release a budget version of the 24-70mm lens with variable aperture – that one could have VR. However, the current pro 24-70mm model will not get VR any time soon in my opinion.
Hi Nasim,
I wanted to invest in two of the lenses recommended by you up here (for the purpose of wedding photography). One of them being the 70-200mm lens. Now I went and checked the price and I find it a little steep for me right now. I wanted to understand how it would compare with 80-200mm f/2.8D. Would it be alright to settle for this now? Would the picture quality be hugely compromised? If not would it be prudent to settle for 80-200mm now and consider the other one later when I can buy it? I own a Nikon D90..do propose to upgrade to an FX soon !!
Appreciate your time. Your inputs are always a great help.
Thanks.
Anne, the old Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 is a great lens with excellent optics and it will work great on your D90. However, if your goal is to upgrade to full-frame in the future, whether to the new Nikon D800 or to some other FX camera, then I would recommend to wait and get the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II when you can afford it. The 80-200mm is very sharp in the center, but its corner performance is really not optimized for full-frame…
Hey Nasim,
Thanks a billion for that input. One more question..if I may, Nasim. How would you rate Sigma 70-200mm vis-a-vis Nikon 70-200.
I greatly appreciate your time.
Thanks.
Anne
Anne, I have tried a sample Sigma 70-200mm before and it had some severe backfocusing issues that could not be addressed by AF micro adjust. I sent it back pretty much immediately. Sigma has gotten better lately, but its quality is still not on par with Nikon in my opinion. From what I have heard talking to other photographers that own the 70-200 Sigma, they say that the lens is pretty sharp in the center, but it is considerably softer in the corners. Basically, you get what you pay for.
Hi Nasim,
Thank you ever so much. I did finally go and get myself the 70-200mm lens and I am ecstatic.
Although I wish I had an FX camera and not my D90..maybe later this year.
I was told at the camera store that Nikon is rumored to be coming out with D600 and strongly recommended that I should maybe go for that. Well, I am not sure at all. Have not a trace of an idea. However, when I do plan on one, I shall come here for advise.
I am currently shooting with 50mm f/1.8D and this new lens that I bought. Would you rather that I invest in just one other lens? Or am I good for now?
I totally appreciate your help. It’s truly priceless for someone like me who really has no one to turn to.
Thanks again.
Cheers.
Hi Nasim,
I have a D7000 as my first DSLR camera with 18-105 mm Nikon DX that goes with the kit. I also bought a Dx AF -S Nikkor 35mm1:1.8G lens recently .
I plan to shoot a wedding ceremony of my friend, do you think my two lenses are enough to be used for the wedding?
need your advice on this.
thanks
noel
Another question, what is the difference between an Fx and a Dx lenses? Which type of lens can i use for my D7000 ?
Many thanks
noel
Hi Noel,
At the top of this page, on the right hand side, you will see a heading called Categories. Work
you’re way through these and 99.9% of your questions will be answered, either in the articles or someone before you has asked.
I have been working my way through these and they have been invaluable. It amazes me how many questions are answered, if people would just read the post or someone else’s previous question.
Cheers and good luck,
DL
Hi Nasim,
I read articles on your website and its very useful for me. Full of Knowledge, Amazing articles, hats off to you.
I am not a professional I am learning now and I want to shoot my friends engagement pics. Please suggest me the camera and lens to buy.
Because I am studying I have a tight Budget so I am planning to buy a Nikon D3100 Camera with Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm F/1.8G Lens. What you say about it. I want to click rememberable awesome photos.
Please help me ASAP.
Nasim, I just saw this page in it’s entirety on a Facebook page … wonder if you know about it.
The least that person could do is credit you (that’s my feeling about this).
https://www.facebook.com/notes/%E5%85%A8%E5%AE%B6%E5%B9%85%E6%94%9D%E5%BD%B1-dm-photography-workshop/best-nikon-lenses-for-wedding-photography/286349131399844?ref=nf
Thanks,
hema
Hi Nasim,
I have a D7000 as my DSLR camera with 85 1.4G.
I plan to shoot a wedding ceremony , which one do you think 24 1.4G or 24-702.8 or 70-200 vr ii 2.8 should i buy to be used for the wedding?
need your advice on this.
And i want to enter landscape, which one useful from that 3 lens.
thanks
noel
Hi Oky.
SInce you are using a crop sensor camera I would probably recommend the 18-55mm 2.8 Nikon or the 24-70mm 2.8. These would give you great versatility and would work well at weddings or for landscapes.
Enjoy!
I need your help. I’m a wedding officiant who’s wife take pictures of my weddings and posts them on my website. I have a D5000 Nikon with the two original lenses that came with it from Costco. I would like to upgrade to a single lens that would work well in low light conditions and situations where my wife has to shoot from a distance and not get in the way of the bride and groom’s photographers. I don’t want to spend a fortune but do want a lens that gets the job done. Your thoughts?
I would like to hear some thoughts… 105 f2.0 DC or 85mm f1.4D. I currently have the 105mm, but hardly put it to use, and for wedding (as a second shooter), I often mount my 80-200mm 2.8D.
Any suggestion on which one is more practical for wedding (105mm or 85mm), I am currently using D300.
Hi, I am a wedding photographer using D700 with 50mm and 24-120mm lens. Now I am upgrading to D800 and also wants to change my 24-120 to 24-70 or 70-200mm. Here I am confuse a little bit that which one is good specially for wedding whether 24-70 or 70-200.
In Indians weddings, I have to work on a little stage for group shots so 70-200mm wouldn’t be a good option (I guess). In this case, I think 24-70 is a good choice. But if there’s a huge difference in image quality, I would go for 70-200mm
Need your suggestion.
Thanks
Hello!
I have stumbled upon your article while looking for some sturdy advice on what lens to get.
The lowdown is this:
Sometimes I do wedding photography for friends or friends of friends. People who just want somebody there to cover proceedings and, most importantly, on a very tight budget.
I have Nikon D80 and following lenses:
50mm 1.4
10-20mm
70-300VR
And for my ‘general’ range I still use (ghasp) the kit lens that came with the body – 18-135mm
I have noticed that it doesn’t perform quite as good as I would like it to, especially in lower light conditions or where faster shutter speed is required.
I would like to improve my performance but at the same time, not break the bank.
Which of the lenses you list above, would you recommend for under $700, to be able to have on my camera through most of the day?
Another question to you, as a professional photographer. How do you manage to swap lenses? Are you not worried you might miss out on an opportunity due to having too ‘short’ a lens on or while you’re changing over? Or do you always have two bodies on you? That one has always worried me, as I’d quite like to use the 50mm more often at weddings, but, as I only have one body, I prefer to stick with a wider option just ‘in case’ :)
Sorry for the War and Peace piece and hoping to hear your thoughts :)
I too have the D80 and did a wedding recently with only one body. I used the 17-55mm f/2.8 for all the main shots until I did candids afterwards with the 70-300mm VR. Later in the evening I then used the 50mm f/1.8 for the low light.
The 17-55mm is expensive so I’d probably recommend the 18-200mm VR for all your shots and your 50mm f/1.4 for low light later in the day. Or spend nothing and use the 18-135mm kit lens instead but I agree it”s quality is not quite there.
This is only an amateur’s reply but I hope it helps.
Hi,
I recently covered and engagement with my D90 and 50mm 1.8D and 70-200mm VR II. The lighting wasn’t desirable and I am not happy with the result I got. I also use a flash but it is an old one. I couldn’t cover much since neither is a wide angle and then mine being a half frame camera didn’t help much.
But what irked me most is that most of my shots indoors were grainy despite ISO at 500 (the lighting was typical yellow lights we have at home) and many had a red hue! I wonder what the WB setting should be.
I am feeling so lost. Wondering what I need to do right to have more sharp pictures and get the right hue. I really could use some help here. I do have an 18-55mm 3.5-5.6G but it’s no good in low lights I agree. However, could I use it with a flash? If so do I need to invest in a flash right away? If yes, which one?
Too many questions I know. I would really appreciate some advise.
Many many thanks.
Anne
Your 70-200 is a stonking good lens but with a cropped sensor your reach is 105-300mm (35mm equiv), a tad too far for the majority of wedding shots. You need a standard zoom, I use the 17-55mm f/2.8 (25.5-82.5mm – 35mm equiv) which is an excellent lens but you could get the 24-70mm (36-105mm – 35mm equiv) if your next step is to go full frame. But I don’t know if 36mm is wide enough for groups, you could move back.
I would imagine your ISO performance is better than the D80 and I won’t shoot higher than 400.
As for WB, I use auto and shoot in RAW, this then allows me to adjust WB in post processing.
The atmosphere of the evening shot is in low light but If you need to use flash (I use SB600, which is just ok) I’d now go for the old SB800 or the new SB910. I also use the Lastolite EZYBOX soft box
http://www.lastolite.com/ezybox-speedlite-softbox.php
on the flash head which gives quite good results.
If I was to regularly shoot weddings I’d invest in a D700, 50mm f/1.4, 24-7omm f/2.8 and 70-200mm f/2.8 as a minimum, IMHO!
This is only an amateur’s reply but I hope it helps.
Alan.
It really sounds like she needs some technical help and not new equipment.
You actually recommended she spend over 3,500 on new equipment….
I shot weddings with a d90 before and got some great results. She should learn more about white balance, metering, using flash, shooting in manual mode and possibly pick up a wider lens and flash. But that all takes experience. You learn as you go and find out which lenses work best for you.
I would recommend she practice at her house taking photos indoors with similar colored lights and play around with the white balance until she gets it right. Auto white balance is not often accurate on the D90.
Also indoors, unless you are shooting a room or a large table of guests your f stop should be between 2.8 and 4.5 tops. This will also help isolate your subjects and get more light, hence less grain.
Thank you very much,Alan.
Much appreciate your inputs.Though right now I have no funds to invest in a new camera or an expensive lens. Maybe by early next year I will be able to..hopefully.
I just need to get my understanding of WB right. I messed up on that front. I was also doing my first engagement coverage..was a tad nervous too!
But thanks again. I will keep your recommendations in mind when I go out to purchase new equipment.
ANNE.
It sounds to me like you still need a little practice shooting in manual mode, and figuring out your white balance settings. That is ok, but will take some time and practice.
If you are shooting indoors in lower light, yes you need a flash. And it will take some time to get used to using it. It is not easy. Make sure to get a flash that fully swivels.
Also if you are shooting at iso 500 and are getting grain it is probably because you don’t have enough light. Do you shoot in automatic or manual mode? What f stop are you using?
Aside from the kit lens your other lenses look like they should do the job. You may want to invest in a 35mm 1.8G lens which is about $200. It will work better indoors where there is limited space.
Also, some grain is acceptable from time to time, but blurriness is not. Are the shots grainy or blurry or both?
Feel free to ask me any questions you may have.
Hey Thomas,
I totally need to get my understanding of the WB right. I think I should go with Auto mode for now. I was on ISO 500 and f/1.8 on my 50mm. There is no blur at all..they are grainy or ‘noisy’.
Mine’s a very old flash. A vivitar and I am not sure I know how to use to get best possible results.
I was checking out the nikon flash available but they are very expensive. I will buy one only if I absolutely must.
I checked out the 35mm lens upon your suggestion.Looks like this will do it for me for now. I do hope though that this will be good enough for my D90 though. I had a terrible time getting group shots with my existing lenses.
I feel better knowing that some grain is acceptable though when I see others’ pictures on the internet I wonder why mine can’t be so crisp. But I guess I will get there with some practice.
Appreciate your help much. But I know I will be coming back for more. :)Thank you.
Oh and I almost always shoot in manual mode.
Just to answer your question,Thomas.
Thx.
lana:
If you are doing weddings you really need a second body (backup) or for full use.
With your $700 you could pick up a used D90 very easily. You could put the 10-20mm on one camera and the 50mm on the other. The D90 is a little better in lower light and and its WB settings are a little better as well.
Also, start charging a little more for these weddings you are shooting and pick up a 35mm 1.8 lens or a longer lens depending on your style.
Two cameras is absolutely essential.
hello tomas, i wrote a queation here few days back but nobody answered. I hope this time,atleast you can answer me. Hi, I am a wedding photographer using D700 with 50mm and 24-120mm lens. Now I am upgrading to D800 and also wants to change my 24-120 to 24-70 or 70-200mm. Here I am confuse a little bit that which one is good specially for wedding whether 24-70 or 70-200.
In Indians weddings, I have to work on a little stage for group shots so 70-200mm wouldn’t be a good option (I guess). In this case, I think 24-70 is a good choice. But if there’s a huge difference in image quality, I would go for 70-200mm
Need your suggestion.
Thanks
Sonal
I know its none of my business, but why are you upgrading from the D700 to D800? As you already have a very nice full frame camera I would suggest to invest in the 24-70mm and the 70-200mm lenses instead.
Unless you don’t have a backup camera.
Remember the D800 image files will be almost twice as large as on your D700. Just a thought.
If you are going to upgrade to the D800 anyways and will be using your D700 as the backup camera I would suggest the 24-70mm. It is a superb lens and will be more flexible during a wedding. No there is not a huge difference in image quality. They are both pro-level lenses.
If you like using zooms you can later save up to get the 70-200mm. Both those lenses work very well together for weddings.
thanks tomas. yea i have a D7000 as backup. the only reason m interested in d800 is because d700 is become a common camera. once i was shooting a wedding and a guy (a guest in wedding) had also a d700. i know thats a stupid reason but i also would like to have something new :)
Sonal.
In my opinion that is not a good reason at all. I use two D7000′s myself. Photography is very expensive and the D800 will most likely not offer you any better images. The better the lens the bigger the impact.
You might need to read mansurovs article about the photographer’s disease. Photography is also very personal, worry about you , your results and what you produce. There will always be someone at a wedding that has a more expensive camera or lens than you. But, most of the time they will be asking you questions and see you as the pro. If you act and produce pro quality work, you are the pro, not the guy with the $5,000 camera and the kit lens.
Sorry if any of this sounded rude, but I see a lot of people falling under the newer is better, more expensive is better mentality, and that’s not the case at all. Aside from you and maybe the client, no one is interested in what you use, but only in the results.
Camera bodies change almost every other year. You will always be upgrading, but some top notch lenses will remain for years. That is the true investment.
Hope I didn’t confuse you.
Thanks,
Tom
Hello there! thank you for this wonderful article.
Am a nursing student, I also love photography (wedding photography), so am kindda new to photography, and I just purchased the Nikon D3100. I would be covering a wedding in August, what type of lenses would you recommend for a starter?
I hav been doing lots of research and I thought of purchasing Nikon Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Wide Angle Lens – 2183 0.16x – 35mm – f/1.8 AND Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF Nikkor Telephoto Zoom Lens – 1947 0.25x – 70mm to 300mm – f/4 to 5.6. But then I want something that would take good pictures (with some kind of blur)of mostly the brides dress, bouquet, the kissing of the couple and the exchange of rings as I learnt those are mainly the features the bride wants to see.
And oh am not the primary photographer.
Advise needed, Thanks a great deal!
Hi Or-say.
I would not recommend the 70-300mm. Although the length is versatile it will be too slow in low light situations. The 35mm is a good starting lens and maybe you can go for the 85mm or a 105mm lens depending on your style. Even a 50mm lens will do you well.
“with some kind of blur” – I’m not sure what you mean by that,
Or you are talking about blurry backgrounds. That is having a shallow depth of field. That is achieved by shooting at f 3.0 to f1.4 (usually). The shallow depth of field will isolate the subject from the background.
You might want to consult with the primary photographer as they may have specific photos and tasks for you for the wedding day. At best you want to be able to mirror their style.
Hi Nasim,
I just needed to know if 35mm 1.8G is a good lens to be had for a dx camera (nikon d90). I do portraits and weddings and I could really use a wider lens. I can’t afford an expensive lens right now.
Many thanks.
Hi Polly.
I’m not sure what you mean by being a good lens. What effect or look are you trying to get?
If your widest lens is a 50mm and you are looking for a wider lens then go for it as it is a great 35mm lens.
Hi Tomas,
I am an avid hobbiest photographer specialized mainly in landscape and nature photography. Lately I have been interested in gaining further experience in portraiture, engagement shoots, weddings etc. I have a D90 body with:
-18-105 3.5-5.6G kit lens
-35 1.8G
-50 1.8D
-85 1.8G (on order)
-30-700 4.5-5.6G
I want to know if it’s worth it to trade in my 70-300, since it is a slow lens, to something wider. Are the lenses I currently have in my arsenal sufficient for shooting weddings, etc? I want to ensure I am covered for both focal lengths as well low lighting situations. I don’t currently have an external flash, I’ve never had to use one due to the nature of my work (landscape). I don’t know how to really work one/what’s the best way to bounce light to get the desired look, so that will take some practice. Is an external flash recommended and if so, which one?
Thanks so much in advance for your valuable and helpful input!
Jess
Hi Jess.
The three prime lenses you have are good lenses.
If you prefer shooting with prime lenses you might want to look at the 105mm 2.8 which is also a macro of the 135mm to have something longer than the 85mm when you need it. Your 30-700 if that is correct will not be very helpful as it will be too slow in lower light situations. The 18-105mm lens is better optically than the 30-700mm.
Also, you will need an external flash and possibly a second camera as well, especially if you are shooting with prime lenses. Weddings move very fast and you need to react and calibrate the camera in seconds.
The 35mm on one lens and the 85mm on another is a great combination and one I use all the time.
Also, you might benefit from a 20mm prime lens when you need to cover more space.
But, please do not attempt a wedding until you have done some portraits and a lot of candid shooting. You can easily do portraits with the equipment you currently have so that might be the best place to start. Figure out lighting on a person and the basics on posing. You will see it is night and day different to landscape photography. Everything moves much quicker.
Good luck and please feel free to ask more questions as you start practicing.
Hi Nasim,
Thank you for such a beautiful and generous site that you have put for us.
I am a beginner in photography and have intentions to buy a Nikon D7000 in the coming week. I have also shortlisted some lenses which are mentioned below which I intend to use for wedding photography.
I am not sure if I am making the right choices with the lenses and thats where you are the Boss. Please tell me wether I need to change the lenses.
The weddings we have here in Goa, India are mostly in the night and are held outdoor in large open air gardens. I also need to get group snaps in the Church where space is a constraint. Hence I have chosen the wide angle lens.
1) AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G ( for couple portraits )
2) AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED ( for group and family photographs from close distance in church )
3) AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR ( for general snaps and zoom ) this lens is not released tough.
I will also get a 910 speedlight flash.
Thats about it. Please suggest what I need to do.
Thanks a million once again for your generosity.
Regards,
Roshan Mathias
Hi Roshan.
As you have mentioned here that most weddings are at night and in churches you will benefit a lot from getting lenses that are 2.8 to 1.4.
I would not recommend the 18-300mm. Even with VR the floating aperture will really frustrate you.
Because you will have a powerful flash the 12-24mm f4 lens might be ok although the benefits of a 2.8 lens will really show themselves in the narrow depth of field and the gathering of more light.
I have a couple questions.
Do you have any of these lenses already? How did you decide upon these? What lens do you currently own? Have you ever taken photos with a flash? How you done any weddings already?
If you have limited experience and no real experience with these lenses or flashes you should first start shooting portraits, photos in different lighting, and start mastering your lenses slowly. The darker the setting the harder it gets. Taking photos in dark settings, with new lenses, and with a new flash will take a long time to master.
I hope this helped and I’m sure Nasim will also offer some good advice.
Hi Thmas Haran
Thank you for showing interest in helping me
As you have asked I wish to tell you that I do not have any lenses yet but plan to buy in the coming week. I had made choice as per the distances to be covered but didnt really look into the lighting factor. My Mistake. I am a pure beginer and have never done any events before. I will be doing some upcoming weddings as a co photographer just to practice.
Thank you once again . . . .
Roshan
Hi, I am a wedding photographer with Nikon D800 and 24-70mm lens. I use to capture portrait with 24-70mm but after viewing the above article, I am thinking to buy a 50mm 1.8g lens for portraits. I wanna ask that would this step will be a good impact on my portrait photography or 24-70mm alone is good for it?
or how can we compare 24-70mm with 50mm 1.8g? Actually I want something which is really sharp and colorful for portrait as Indian brides and grooms use to wear heavy embroidery dresses.
I would be glad for anyone who answer this post as I really dont know about 50mm :)
Thanks
It really depends on your needs and your budget. What lenses do you already have? I’ve shot portraits with my 50mm F1.8G and it’s worked very well. I’ve shot portraits with my 85mm F1.4G and the results are amazing. You can use your 24-70mm for portraits too – I’ve used mine for it at weddings.
The 50mm F1.8G is very inexpensive (relatively speaking) and is very sharp and contrasty while yielding good colors. If you’re shooting full length shots of the couple or a small group, the 50mm would be pretty ideal. If you’re shooting 1/2 to 3/4 length portraits, your 24-70mm at 70mm is good as well.
You might want to rent the lenses first to test them out to see what you need – if you’re in the United States, try BorrowLenses.com.
DANA – Great answer
Pranesh, I would say the same thing. If you are also looking for a very shallow depth of field either the 50 1.8G or the 85 1.8G/1.4 would be great. In the end it depends on your style and what you feel most comfortable with. I have a tendency to go for a prime lens and others have a tendency to go for a zoom lens for its flexibility.
I noticed that you are shooting full frame. I would highly recommend the 85mm 1.4 or 1.8. It is a flattering perspective, great bokeh, great color, narrow depth of field and very sharp.
Try a couple out and see what you like best.
Thank you Dana and Tomas. The only thing which is bothering me is difference. Let me tell you that i am a average photographer. I also love my 24-70mm but I wanna know that do I need another lens like 50mm with 24-70mm? I do everything with just one lens. I can buy 50mm too if its really good for portraits than 24-70mm. Yes I am a FX shooter and recently move from amateur to pro photography thats why my concepts are not very much clear :) if 50mm is good for portrait, i will use it in another body. 24-70mm will remain for group shots and 50mm for portraits..hows it?
first of all, a 50mm is always good to have..either 1.8 or 1.4.
it is light and it is very sharp ( at least the 1.8G).
However, owning a D800 does NOT make you go from Amateur to Pro photographer, especially if your concepts are not very clear, and you “do everything with just one lens”
i have never seen a pro using just one lens or one body
First, you learn about the craft and art of photography,and when you know “what is what” about photography without asking basic questions ….then, you will be a PRO photographer!!!
Now, i am going to go buy a Ford Fusion, put some nice stickers on the doors and hood…and become a PRO NASCAR driver!!!
Yes, i like to speak my mind from time to time…and i KNOW that some people (PROs) will agree with me on that!
Anyways, i wish you luck, and go get that 50mm……it will change your world of photography!!!!
SIncerely
When talking 50mm lenses which one should be the “go to” lens? 50mm f1.4 d, f1.8d,f1.8g. ?Which one is the best value for the price? Thanks! Also how much different/better are they from the 35mm?
Hi Nasim,
I am a begginner and I have been shooting with my Nikon D90 and i have the 50mm 1.8 lense and also the one that came with it. lately i have been asked to do more work and I am thinking about upgrading. I love the D90 but I am trying to figure out what to updgrade to,
what would you recommend? Something for the long runa nd that will be worth the money. I was thinking either the Nikon D3S or Nikon D800? the D800 is cheaper but i want to get great gear since i am doing more work and want something to use for a long time. I was also thinking about getting the Nikon 85mm 1.4G lense. I appreciate your feedback and suggestions.
I do mostly portraits and weddings.
thanks again
Nergiz
You stated that you are a beginner. If you are doing portraits and weddings as a beginner it would be a good idea to get a second body. I would recommend picking up a new D7000. It is better in low light than the d90, has a lot more options and build better. Also once you really get rolling with a lot of business and are making hundreds of dollars you can look at getting another camera. If you use your camera often you will most likely be replacing it every three years.
My recommendation is to pick up the D7000 and save some of that money and put it towards a nice lens.
Be aware that a good lens will last you A LOT more than a good camera. I’d recommend getting the 35mm 1.8 and the 85 1.4 lenses and the D7000. Good luck!
Thanks Tomas for your reply,
I did my research and looks like the D3S is discontinued. I have looked at the D800. I am thinking about that one. It is not as expensive as the D4. I want to get a good camera as I am starting to get more work. I haven’t really thought about the D7000. I do want to get a full frame camera and I also was thinking about getting the 85 1.4 lense as I have heard great things about it. What are your thoughts on the D800?
Hi Nergiz.
The D800 sounds awesome, but for me the file sizes and price are a little beyond my budget.
I am and might recommend waiting for the D600 which will be coming out this winter. It is less expensive than the D800 and by that time you’ll know exactly how much work you are getting.
But, if you can afford it. Get a good camera and fantastic lenses. Buy a lens because you need it to perform a specific task or to perform it much better. Try and then buy is my opinion.
Tomas,
Thank you for your input. I can afoord the D800 and I have great things about it. I will definetly be getting some good lenses. I kind of had the budget for like a D4 and that is what I was trying to figure out, but I think I will get the D800 which is cheaper than the D4 and I will still have some money to spend on a good lense. I am thinking about getting the 85mm 1.4. Would that be a good lense to get with the D800?
Also I have the 50mm 1.8 lense will that still be a good lense to use with the D800?
Hi,
This is a very simple question :) I have noticed today that when I bring my camera (Nikon D800) into live mode, my shutter speed become slow and also the shutter sound changes. But if I am shooting with viewfinder, the shutter speed is fast. I have set my shutter speed to 8000.
I know this is not a fault but why its happening?
Thanks
Hi, Can anybody help me? My issue is low light photography…low light means the sunlight at 5:30 am. I have a Nikon D800 with 24-70mm lens. I tried to shoot in all modes but no use. In shutter priority mode, I get black fill pictures, in other modes, I can able to get images but brighten than original scene(tried all ISO 100-6400) and also the shutter speed become slow causing the blur images.
I am working on an assignment. Please help. How can I get original low light scenario images?
Thanks
HI there, I recently started a photography business and its flourishing faster then I imagined, and I’m finding myself needing another camera. I have a 40d and a d5100, and I’m looking to get either a d7000 or a d90. Could everyone give me their opinions on those two cameras to compliment the two that I already have? which would be the better investment?
also if i have a 35 1.8 lens, do I need to also have a 50, either 50 1.4 or 1.8? Or should I invest in another lens, and if so which one should be my first priority?
Thank you!
Hi Nasim,
I have the D5000 with the lenses from the kit and additionally I got the 35mm/f1.8. As the 35mm take good clear pictures especially low light, but on people, it tends to make the person heavier than they really are in reallity!! I wad told because this is a wide angle lens and that was why people looks heavier in the picture. How can I remedy this? Is there any lenses that is true to reality? I took a test today comparing myself in the mirror together with the ucture I took with ythe 35mm and I look heavier than I really are in person!!
I will be going to Grand Canyon too and will be taking lots of pictures of myself with the landscape behind me. How and what lens to use to make the person in the picture look slim and the background clear? I don’t need bokeh for this beautiful Grand Canyon… I am leaving in 2 weeks, please help me!! Thank you!
hello..i have this lens and i do process my photos with Lightroom…if you don’t have lightroom, then get it!! it will correct the distortion automatically.
i never have the problem of people looking heavier!!!!….or maybe the people that you are taking photos of, just don’t want to admit that they are a little heavier than they think they are :)))))
SIncerely
Hi Jasmine.
It sounds to me like you are looking for a good focal length to use. I would have to say that it depends on your distance to your subject. The 35mm is the closest to the “eye view” on a crop sensor camera. But, you might enjoy the 50mm 1.8D better as its a tad longer and is only about $100. Maybe borrow one and see what you think.
Although for a wide angle photo of say the grand canyon all you have to do is stand further back, you were probably too close to your subjects.
I hope that helps.
Hi Nasim,
I have been asked by my cousin to be her daughters photographer on her wedding and I am very nervous about it, I am an amateur and just started to get into photography, due to limited budget her mom decided to not to hire a professional photographer and instead had asked me to do it. I take decent pictures with my Nikon D5100, I have a 18-55 lens, 35 mm 1.8 and 55-300 F4.6 lens, I plan on using my 35mm indoors to take picture of her daughter getting ready, the flowers and dress and for portraits too, i was thinking about using my 55-300 when the ceremony begins so i could zoom in on people without being in the way of peoples view and at the same time I could get candid shots without them noticing me, My question is will these 2 lenses cover everything and what setting should i use to make sure everything is clear? the church is well lit, if I use flash how do i use it and when..any tips and suggestions would be highly appreciated..Thanks
Ryan.
From what you wrote here please do not do this wedding. Try to find someone, family friend or other local photographer with more experience doing weddings or birthday parties to do this for you.
To answer your question, the two lenses will cover everything, but with the wrong settings and without the use of a powerful flash all the photos will be blurry or very grainy. Your two zoom lenses are two slow and will require too much light.
Aside from learning how to use lenses well and in (live motion situations) are two completely different things. Also, if you have never really used flash before there is an extensive learning curve in that as well.
Please turn down this wedding and ask your cousin to look on craigslist for a photographer. There are many photography students and amateurs on there with experience that will charge very little.
Feel free to e-mail me if you would like to discuss. I am only trying to be helpful.
God day Nasim,
Thank you for your response I do know that I still have alot to learn when it comes to photography and equipments and I do appreciate your honest opinion, anyways I still have time so I can still talk to her about it and see if I can convince her to re consider, With a limited budget what equipments would you suggest ( For future reference ) when it comes to weddings and indoor events? i would really appreciate it and thanks again Nasim.
Hi. This is Tom and not Nasim.
I would have to admit that it is not as much about the equipment and rather on the experience of shooting in different lighting, posing people, using flash in small and large rooms and controlling crowds etc.
I would suggest a 85mm 1.8 or 1.4 lens. That with your 35mm lens work very well together.
I would also suggest a good sb700 or sb900 as a flash (with practice).
I would also suggest a second camera body as well as a backup.
If you prefer zooming you would do really well renting the 24-70mm nikon and the 70-200mm nikon. And get a second body as well.
My recommendation to you is to bring your camera everywhere and practice taking photos indoors and outdoors during a party. See what settings you need and to practice more with your flash. After that you can work as an assistant for a local wedding photographer and get first hand experience in a fast-paced environment where it is ok to make a few mistakes here and there, but you will learn tons.
I hope this helped.
Hi Tom,
My apologies for addressing you as Nasim and thank you so much for your feedback, as for the equipmen I was planning on getting the sb700 for my flash have been trying to get some inputs on tutorial videos on how to use flash and write down any tips so i can apply it once i get my order , also would you recommend a Tamron 70-200 2.8 lens over a nikon 70-200 2.8? I see a big difference in price and was wondering which one I would benefit from most.
Thanks again for your suggestion this will really help me with my development as a amateur photographer Hope you wont get tired reading my email and questions.
Good Day to you and God Bless !
Hi.
No problem at all. I like to help when possible. Best thing with flash is to get a subject and practice in different lighting and size rooms. Bounce off ceilings and sometimes walls, use a bounce card as well and see what works best for you. Never shoot flash head on.
As for the 70-200m I would suggest the Sigma. I used it before and is very good. You have the choice or regular or one with vibration reductions which i think is called IS. Should be about the same price as the Tamron. Or, pick up a used Nikon 80-200mm. The nikon will be sharper, but the Sigma will have the vibration reduction and will be a newer lens as well.
Flash is difficult, but very fun once you start seeing some results. Keep an eye on your white balance as changes in lighting and the use of flash will start changing the colors of your photos a little so you will have to learn to adjust to make White’s look white and other colors look their color.
good luck! Feel free to e-mail me directly or visit my site where you may ask me questions as well. Thanks!
Hi Nasim,
I am new to wedding photography. I have a wedding coming up. And my equipment is as follows:
Nikon d90
18-55mm
35mm 1.8 G
50mm 1.8 D
70-200mm 2.8G
Would this be okay to cover events between 5pm and 11pm? If I need anything, your reco, I will have to rent that. Can’t afford to buy anymore. I also have a regular vivitar lens. I have done engagement shoots with the above but I missed a wide angle. With my 18-55 I must use a flash and I don’t always enjoy that.
Thanks for your help. Thanks so much.
You should look at renting a second camera body and put your 35 on one and a long lens on the other.
What flash do you use? Make sure to get comfortable using your flash. But everything else looks good.
Wow you shoot with a lot of lenses at a wedding reception. Would love to try those f1.4s at weddings. For me I primarily use two lenses on two FX bodies attached to a couple of SB-900s (17-35 f2.8 and AFS 80-200mm f2.8). I also use a 50mm and a macro for other specialty shots. No lens is perfect, but I guess we all have to work with what we got :-)
Hi Nasim and Tom,
Me and my wife likes photography and feel so lucky that we found you and your Articles/Comments clarifying lot questions and confusion. So thankful to you.
We mostly take family/kids pictures inside home, outdoor and also in weddings for personal use. So far our experience is with Point and Shoot camera. We now narrowed down our DSLR camera search to Nikon D7000 body and one Nikon prime lens to start off with (35mm 1.8G or 50mm 1.4G or 50mm 1.8G or some other focal length prime based on your advice).
We tried Nikon D7000+50mm 1.8G last week in store (only Nikon prime lens available in store to try) and we liked the picture quality on the camera screen. Especially my wife felt good grip with the camera in her hands.
Please advice your opinion,
Is considering only one prime cater our current style of photography?
Which prime you recommend to buy as a start?
Because D7000 is a fantastic model, we want to explore more on primes/zooms as we gain knowledge.
Thanks for your time.
Hi Ajay.
Sorry for not responding earlier.
I’m positive that by now you have made your purchase, but use a couple of D7000s myself.
You mentioned that you do photos indoors and outdoors. The 35mm 1.8G would be the best bet for you. It is super sharp and will allow you to get slightly wider shots than the 50mm. So when you have no more room to back up having that wider angle really helps. Enjoy!
Feel free to e-mail me directly with any further questions, I’d be happy to help.
Great write up! Saved to my favorites!
Hey,
I am shooting a wedding in August, and I need to rent a few lens. I have currently a 50mm 1.8G, Nikon. I am shooting with a NikonD5000. I was thinking about renting a 24-70mm 2.8. Any suggestions on any other type of lens. I will also be renting a SB910 flash.
Thanks
Hi Rebekah.
This is Tom. I was hoping to help, but it looks like you already did your wedding. It looks like you were missing a long lens like a 70-200mm or 105mm. How did it go? Did you have any further questions I could help you with? Feel free to e-mail me directly. Thanks.
Hi Nasim!
What are your thoughts in regards to using the new 28mm 1.8g as opposed to the 24mm 1.4g? Are we soon gonna see 28mm 1.8g review?
Also have you had any experience using the 105mm f2 or the 135mm f2? I am curious how they perform compared to the 85mm 1.4/g/d or even the 1.8g for weddings/portraints.
Greetings Nasim,
Great article! Very informative. I have a question. I have a d3100 with 18-55mm. Have been clicking for a while now, sceneries, landscapes, long exposures. Just the normal beginner stuff. A very good friend of mine is insistent on me clicking her wedding. Its an Indian wedding. The ceremony will be held in a Gurudwara , a kind of temple and the reception in an auditorium. Preceding day, there will be another function where all the women gather and sing songs, so it will be indoors at some house I think. My friend has offered to buy me a lens, any 1 lens for the wedding. And I need your help here. Which one should I buy? Totally confused. Oh one more thing, there will be another photographer clicking away but she will be selecting majorly from my clicks.
Thank you so much! :)
For weddings If you just have a 18 -55, I would suggest just a 50 f1.4 or f1.8.
If you can a 70 – 200 Vr II for versatility
or a 85 1.4 G used at f2 to f4 for amazing portrait.
It all depend on what style of images you are suppose to take.
- Day/night?
- can you get close to people?
- but you will need a flash with plenty practice, batteries and Memory cards.
The most important for a wedding are the people images.
I have invested in a D800E and few lenses.
- a 50 1.4G for any people group shoots, any low light situation. It doesn’t look much but it does evrything.
- a 14 – 24 F2.8 for amazing landscapes and interior shots (The best lens ever for creative shots)
- 85 f1.4 manual focus for portrait. very unforgiving at full aperture. I would love to try the 135 F2 to see the difference.
- a micro 200 f4 for close ups, details and so on, can also be used a normal telephoto, but very slow.
- I like to have a 70- 200 f2.8 vr II for versatility.
For wedding photography maybe shift lens would be the last lens I would buy, for the so rare occasion when you have the time to play and take a shot.
Hello Nasim,
I was curious when you said “Nikon released a much cheaper, compact and lighter 50mm lens in 2011 – the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G. It actually performs better than the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G in many ways”.
I mean, other than much cheaper, compact and lighter, could you please explain another good things from 50mm f/1.8 that could beat the great 50mm f/1.4 in many ways? Because I’m planning to change my 50mm 1.4D to a better 50mm.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Nasim, I’m sorry I asked a question you’ve already answered before. but this time I have a question I couldn’t find anywhere on your site. A fast lens like 50mm f/1.4, is it really fast or is it just fast because we use the maximum aperture?
I mean, let’s say I’m using 50mm f/1.8 at max aperture, and I’m using 50mm f/1.4 at f/1.8 as well under the exact same condition, is the 50mm f/1.4 still faster than 50mm f/1.8?
I’m sorry if this is a stupid rookie question but I wanna make sure that I’m thinking the right way.
Thanks a lot Nasim.
This website is absolutely amazing. I was searching allready a long time anything about photography. But what i found here is genious. Keep up the good work.
Greetings from Belgium
Just wondering what your thoughts are on 24-70 vs 24-120 if it was a choice? 24-70 is the better lense but is having the versatility of the 120 better?
Hi Derek.
It really depends on what you are taking photos of, what other lenses you have and why these are the two lenses you are comparing as there are several others in the same range. For walk-around and “most used perspective” the 24-70mm length is ideal. Also it is a very sharp lens.
Hello,
This is a great post and very informative. I typically shoot like a photojournalist, which means I need to go from 18-300mm distances quite fast. Often, I dont have the luxury of changing lenses midway as I may lose out on the action. I have seen that this also applies to wedding photograpy, where the main photographer would be taking carefully composed shots. This leaves me to capture candid scenes elsewhere, which often complements the entire shoot.
I understand that primes perform best, while too much zoom can weaken the quality of images. But in the situation I described, do you agree that a single 18-300mm lens is perhaps better than a couple of lenses?
Hi Nasim, My friend wants me to cover their wedding in december I am more of a street photographer by the way. They no longer want to get a pro shooter due to budge constraint and it will be also a small family affair of about 20-25 persons only.. I want them to reconsider due to my lack of experience in covering weddings but they want me to do it for them.. I have a d7000 and d5000 body.. a 50mm 1.8G, 85mm 1.8G and 18-105mm VR. I also have a nissin Di866 Mark II speedlight. will it suffice and get me through the event or any suggestions on other things to add to the gears mentioned. the wedding will be in the afternoon at around 5pm by the way. thanks!
Hi Nazim and Tomas
I’m an amature who likes to shoot weddings. I normaly shoot with d700 alone with no back up. I’m thingking to get a d800, so with two cameras i don’t need to switch lenses to often. But on the other hand i also need to purchase a wide angel lens since i don’t have any of them to shoot group potrait. My lenses are Af-s 80-200mm, 85mm f1.8d, 50mm f1.8d. Please advise your opinion. Should get the d800 or get the wide angel lenses instead and make my d50 as a back up camera.
Thanks alot Nazim and Tomas
Richard.
My suggestion would be to pick up the D600 as it is a little cheaper than the D800. And then you can pick up a 20mm or 28mm prime lens for under $400. Having a second camera that works well is a great way to go. Just my thought.
Nasim, I have been entertaining the idea of shooting a wedding for a friend though I am currently using a D300 with 2 lenses, 18-105mm that came with the camara and a hand me down 10 year old 70-300mm 1:4-5.6. Also I have not seen the D300 mentioned throughout these comments. What are your thoughts of the D300 and any suggestions on lens additions/ upgrades. Thanks so much
Ricer.
First, what is your experience taking photos? Have you done any parties or events?
Your equipment is a great start, but you will need a flash and most likely a fast prime lens as well. The 35mm 1.8G is inexpensive but very sharp.
The D300 is a decent camera, but you need faster lenses that will gather more light and can give you that great depth as well.
If you prefer zooms you might want to rent a 24-70mm and the 70-200mm lenses as they make a great combo.
Thank you for the response, I recently turned down the offer to do the wedding though I still am going to go as second type shooter for him, and the photographer has agreed. I didnt want to step on toes not to mention the pressure of failing a friend.
You recommended the 35mm beigng sharp and low cost, would it be a better investment to go straight to the 50mm I have read so much about. As far as the 70-200mm I have been keeping my eye out and gonna stash some cash away for that one.
Thanks for all the input.
Great move Scott.
Having one or two weddings under your belt as a second shooter will teach you so much.
The 50mm is such a fantastic lens, but you are using a D300 which is crop sensor. To get a more normal field of view the 35mm would probably work better for you. The 50mm would appear to be closer to a 75mm on your camera. Which means that if you were taking photos indoors with limited space the 50mm would probably be too long for you.
Also, down the road you could own both as they are both under $300.
Good luck!
Hi,
A friend of mine has asked if I would take photos for his wedding in December (New Zealand.. so hopefully warmer weather). I have a D800E which is a little bit of a concern given the moire but I’ve heard of a few professionals using these for weddings. I have a 14-24mm, 50mm 1.4G, 70-200mm 2.8, and 105mm macro. I’ve taken two weddings for family before, but that was using DX with 18-200 lens available.. now I’ve gone FX, I am a little concerned about the lack of coverage in 24-70 range. I can’t really afford to get a 24-70 outright, only if I trade in existing lenses. So I wanted some feedback from some experienced photographers on whether my line-up will suffice and I should just chillax and enjoy.
Cheers,
David.
Wedding Photographers Southend provides excellent and quality essex wedding services with specialist wedding phographers your beautiful and special wedding day and capturing beautiful images
Tomas/Nassim-
My auties would want me to take pictures for my cousins wedding (coming up in three weeks), but I suggested against it because I am yet to shoot an event of this magnitude. However, I recommended being a back up to a professional photographer, to which they acquiesced. I own a Nikkon D5100 with an 18-55mm VR Lens, as well as an AF-S NIKKOR 55-300MM F/4.5-5.6G ED VR lens.
Based on one of your post, you recommended using a Nikon 50mm f/1.8G lens for weddings and I also intend on getting a Nikon SB-910 off-camera flash, could you please confirm the down/upside of me purchasing these equipments in addition to what I already have for wedding and potrait photography going forward? Your suggestions are more than appreciated.
Thank you….
-Temi.
Temi.
Yes the 50mm 1.8 G is fantastic and you will get great use out of it.
The other two lenses you have are ok and with flash they should serve you well, but the 50mm will give you better optical quality and better/sharper depth of field. But, if you are indoors doing group shots the 18-55 might work better as its wider.
Also, if you have never used a flash before make sure to read up on it. Never aim directly at your subject. Use the ceiling or wall to bounce off of.
As this will be your first wedding be super observant. See where the other photographer positions themselves, how they setup from one photo to another, how they keep track of time, what their style is and if its something you like or not, and make sure to not get into their shot.
You will do well and you will really like the 50mm lens.
Another good blog Nasim.
The picture of the groom with his best man and ushers illustrates why I think 24mm is too wide for people shots. The guys to the far left and right are giants compared to those in the centre. At first glance – and in terms of content – it’s a nice shot, but not to illustrate the best use of that lens.
Personally, I use two primes; a 35mm (or 28mm widest) and 85mm on two ff bodies, with a 24-70 zoom as a last resort (ie. tight spaces / bad weather group shots indoors).
Using minimum equipment keeps it simple and helps develop a distinctive style, which is something clients need to see in order to make a choice to book you vs. another photographer.
PS. I’m surprised at that commercial above – 474) – that’s a cheap-shot ‘contribution’ if ever I saw one.
Not sure if this site is still being looked at however, I’m an amateur photographer going to purshcase my first full frame camera. I’ve been a second wedding shooter for the last 10 years and am finally venturing on my own. Currently the d600 prices are great but hopefully it’ll be my backup camera later and something better will come along. My main question is about lenses, which 3 lenses must I have for this endeavour of wedding photography.
hello,
if you have been doing 2nd shooter for 10 years, i don’t really understand why you would be asking this question!!?? did you actually shoot during those 10 years or just hold the photographer’s equipment?
Anyways, if you are looking for zoom lenses : 24-70 f/2.8 and 70-200 f/2.8 are what to get for weddings.
For primes in a Full Frame, i would choose : 24mm f/1.4 (or 1.8 if short on cash)…50mm F/1.4..and 85 f/1.4…and if you want to add a 4th prime lens : 180mm
Haa haa thanks, that was sweet. I was asking for the top 3 essential lenses from a professionals opinion. Not a bitter wannabee behind a computer screen. The photographer I worked with was a lot like yourself all knowing but not the nicest person around. Photography is subjective and everyone’s opinion is different which is why my question was asked in the first place. If you do have any incite other than the obvious please share.
FIrst of all, this “bitter wannabee behind a computer screen” shot 31 weddings this year, using prime lenses only…oh!! and also using a Nikon F5 as well…..
Also, i did give you my opinion but i guess that you did not read to the end of the reply…so let me repeat what i DO use : Nikon 35mm f/1.4…50mm f/1.4…85mm f/1.4 and a 180mm f/2.8…as well as an old nikkor 55mmf/2.8 AF Micro lens
also as you stated :”Photography is subjective and everyone’s opinion is different ”
therefore, you should follow that advice and make up your own opinion.
How someone’s else opinion is going to work on your photography?? are you taking those people along with you on a Tour bus when you are going to photograph a wedding.
i can picture it in my mind : “hey Mike, should i use a 35 or a 50 mm on that pose???..oh, hold on! let me ask Mandy as well” :)
Go rent some lenses, try them and decide what is BEST for you.
ps: i am not bitter…i just did not understand why after shooting weddings for 10 years, you had the need to ask what lenses were the best for weddings. For me, i just did not make sense…
also, i never said that i knew it all!!! where did i ever wrote that???
Maybe YOU should spend more time taking photographs instead of asking advise from people online…..
if you did not want to hear a honest answer, you should not have asked the question.
@Chirs,
Are u saying with lens 18-55mm or 55-200mm ,I will not have a good shots.
@Olayinka,
this is not what i am saying, also, i have never used those 2 lenses. I only use prime lenses and i have no problem with that. it does suit my style of shooting.
However, if you are looking for a zoom lens, i would recommend a fast lens (f/2.8 or better) as you will get better results, specially in low light ( indoor ceremony and reception).
Also, don’t buy a lens because someone told you so. Buy one that you know that will go with your style. the best way to find out what lens is best for you is to rent a few and try them. You can rent at borrowlenses .com.
Hello, I left a comment earlier I just want to insure you received it, if not I will post it again
Thanks
I am reposting my note again as it seems it didn’t go through the first time:
I own a Nikon D700 and a 50mm f1.8 Prime Lens.
My aim is to shoot Landscapes, portraits and weddings. I was however told that I should not go for the midrange zoom as I was planning on buying the 24-70mm. They instead advised me to go for the 70-200 VR II.
Now I really need your advice:
- What is the added value of the 24-70? Would I got close results from my 50mm if I move closer or further from the subject or the wide angle is significant for 24-70?
- Can I shoot landscapes if I buy the 70-200 VRII or the angle will be narrow? how about sharpness? How sharp is it at f22?
- How about using it to shoot Weddings? do I have to be very far from the subject as it is starting at 70mm?
Thank you very much for your support
Hi Bob,
It all depend on what kind of images you will be shooting most. Landscape 14 – 24 2.8 is the best on the market all brands put together. For weddings the 24 -70 is a great all rounder but not as sharp as the 14 -24.
Candid shots, portrait the 70 – 200 2.8 VR II is amazing but it’s not a very discreet lens. if you can get close to your subject a 50 1.8 might be your best option for great bokeh. All that said make your own opinion using them. If you don’t like them, sell them , try using primes 24 f1.4, 85 f1.4, 135 f2, 50 f1.4 and 105 macro for details. the 70 -200 vr II has no competition.
Cheers
photographylife.com is a fantastic site. I’ve spent hours looking at all the great info you have on here. Also the in depth reviews are great as they are fairly candid and not just a list form.
I absolutly love the site and enjoy reading and learning from everyones questions.
I still have a Nikon D300 and for Christmas received a 35mm 1.8 and 50mm 1.4 That I love to use to take pictures of my wife with our 4month old. However my wife’s boss has asked her if I would take their family portraits and of course my wife said no problem. Promblem 1- there will be 8 people, and I have not shot anymore that 2 people, oh and a toddler. Problem 2- they want it to happen between 8-10am when the light is not that good and warm. I generally try to take photos in late afternoon. Problem 3- It’s my wifes boss.
Question, any recommendations on lenses, will the ones I have work or shall I look into barrowing a lens if possible.
Indoors or outdoors? If it’s outdoors, the 50mm lens will be just fine. I’d be more concerned about lighting than lens selection. If you’re not really a portrait photographer and they’re expecting a certain “level” of photography, I’d be very up front with them before you take the photos……if you deliver a Whopper w/ cheese and they’re expecting a filet mignon, that could be somewhat awkward after the fact. My ex used to do the same thing….not necessarily with photography, but she would always volunteer me for stuff and it would annoy the crap out of me.
For cooler color temps in the morning, you can just adjust your white balance in post if you’re shooting in RAW (as you should be doing anyway).
Let them know you are an amateur and make sure not to charge a lot. Taking a photo is easy, but taking a great photo is difficult. Give it your best shot and be honesty about your experience level. You’ll do well.
And most of all practice, practice, practice. If you love photography you’ll continue to learn.
You will be fine as as you have a great sense of humour. The Best portrait photographers break the ice early and eventually get personal with their subjects and have them laugh… no pressure… just have fun with it. good luck. remember they are more nervous than you are.
Hi
I have just switched to digital and am so lost. I have a wedding to shoot and have a new D7000 +50mm 1.4G which I just realised is in effect is a 75mm and just not wide enough . I have the old 24-70. 24-50, 70-210 which I love and still use for my studio work but would like to get a fast wide zoom but cannot seem to find one suitable. I prefer to stick to Nikkor but will consider other brands if quality is not compromised too much. I really need a fast lens though as there will be very little light. I am also tossing up between an SB-600 or the new SB-700, don’t think I’d need the 910. However, please advise what you think, will only have 2 bodies to alternate with.
Nat
Hi Nat.
Looks like you’re in a tough spot. I hear that going from an all manual camera to digital takes about a month to fully adjust to. Settings are different and options vary.
For a lens, use what you have. Your 24_70 should work well.
If not pick up a 20mm 2.8 for your wider shots.
For the flash maybe the sb700 is better as it has more options.
Have you shot weddings before? Do you have much experience shooting event photography with flash?
Good luck.
Hi
Thanks! Yes I have shot events before,for weddings mainly used Eos 1D and L series lenses, but rarely used the 580ex, don’t like flash! But I will have to use one this time round as it will be a night wedding so a must! Will go to the location prior to practice bounce flash, will use reflector outside if I can get enough light. Was going to go for a D600 to get full frame but may not be worth the $$$. I am happy with the D7000 but digital doesn’t seem to hold the old saying ‘invest in the lenses first’ as the body now controls the ISO and other factors that pro film did before, so not sure if I need a FX body instead?
Thanks
Yes the saying about buy a better lens does hold true. I have a couple d7000s and they do work great, but in really low lighting you’d prefer a full frame camera or be very handy with flash.
It is all in preference, proper use of flash can give amazing results.
Just note that shooting over 1600 iso will result in obvious grainyness.
Just make sure to practice tons with your new camera, lenses, flash. last thing you want is fumbling with settings on that day.
Good luck.
Hi Nasim,
Truly a wonderful article,especially for people like me who are about to start their carrier as a wedding photographer.
I really need your guidance in making things happen to me. I will be doing my first assignment next month. I do have NIKON D800 and D5000 with me. I am planning to shoot with both these cameras as it will give me flexibility in terms of focal length.
My problem is I am still not able to figure out which lenses I should mount on both of them to achieve the best of results. Sometimes i feel wide angel on FX and long lens on DX should do. But then i also think vice versa.And for which camera i should carry 50 mm prime with me.
Please share your thoughts on this. I will be really grateful.
Thanks,
Nishant
I have the Nikon D5100 , And I was looking to get a new camera to do wedding What should I get the Nikon D700, the Nikon 7000?
I have the 17-50 f 2.8
the nikon 70-200 2.8
the nikon 50mm 1.4
what is the next lens to get?
Thank you Kristi
Hi Kristi.
Have you done weddings before? Do you have a good flash? Do you plan on doing many weddings? It often comes down to budget, ideal camera features and what you plan to do long term. Feel free to email me directly if you have more questions. What lenses are you debating over?
tomasharanphotography@hotmail.com
nasim is there a big difference between the nikon 70-200 vr2 compared to the vr1? i have a friend who wil sell her the vr1. but my dream lens which i plan to buy is the vr2. is vr2 optics is better than vr1? can i expect more from this new version of 70-200?
Hi Manny.
There is a slight difference, but will mostly be seen from upgrading from a kit lens or another long lens. The vr1 is a fantastic lens. And it is much cheaper. Remember these are very heavy lenses.
Always go with your budget and how often you plan on using the lens.
hello,
i have a nikon 5100 d and want to start wedding photography, should i go for the lens that comes in the box with the dslr or buy a tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical autofocus lens?
Hi Hassan.
Why do you want to start wedding photography? What is your current expertise?
Also never shoot a wedding with a kit lens or if you don’t know how to shoot in manual mode.
I would recommend either the noon 35mm or 50mm 1.8 to start. They are both much cheaper and better optically than the Tamron.
Wedding photography is the hardest aspect of photography. Master the basics and take it slow.
In addition you will need a good flash and know how to bounce it correctly.
Good luck.
Hi. I’m using D300. And my Lens are
AF 18-70mm 1:3.5-4.5G ED
AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G
AF 50mm 1:1:8D
Tokina 11-16 F2.8
I’m ask to do a wedding event. Is it enough?
I done some wedding event and events before (not pro), the lens I use are AF 18-70 and Tokina lens. The Tokina lens came out quite nice. But my 18-70, I feel the photo came out not that I like. Not sharp and no Bokas.. Hee..
I thinking a of getting 24mm f2.8 ( not so ex) is it good enough?
And AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4D IF or AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR (which one is better)
Hope you can advice on the lens I should get.
Thanks!
hi nasim,
I’m using Nikon D7000. my lenses; nikon 18-200 mm, nikon 50mm/1.4G, and nikon 85mm/3.5
in few months my friends want me to take their wedding picture. i have two d7000 which lense should i use?
thank u
wijana
Hi Wijana.
If you have never photographed a wedding and the client knows your experience level use the lenses you know. Learn from this experience and then find out if you liked the experience. No point to buy an expensive lens and then find out you dont like photographing weddings. It is not for everyone.
Hello sir I own a NIkon D3200 Nikon camera and wanted to know if it is good enough for wedding photography. I also wanted to know if you could recommend me a good lens for it. Thank You
Nasim,
I’ve been a fan for some time now, and I felt you were the best person to ask this question,
like many of the post before mine, here we go…
I am shooting a wedding next month with a Nikon (DX) 7100 and I’m wanting to purchase better glass to maximize my cameras output ability.. I’m currently using a “Prime” set up to do most of my Portrait work such as the Nikon 35 1.8 50 1.8 and 85 1.8 but I would like to add some Zoom’s for there flexibility and impeccable quality, but I can’t decide on which would work best on DX format…. Which lenses would you recommend ?
Wide angel zoom?
Telephoto zoom?
Standard Zoom?
Which and why?
I really like your web sight it has help me a lot so I read your wedding lens to use ok question? if you was doing a small wedding and had a DX camera like the D7000 or D7100 to use could u use this lens combo as a wedding kit the first lens is of course the 70-200mm F/2.8 lens now lets get to the others 85mm…50mm…35mm……28mm F/1.8g lens then ether sigma 17-50mm or tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 lens