What are the best Nikon lenses for wedding photography? This question comes up so often via comments and emails from our readers, that I was first going to include it in our Photography FAQ section, but then decided to write a separate article and elaborate on the subject a little more. Specifically, I want to not only write about what lenses I think are the best for weddings, but also why and in which cases we use a particular lens. Please keep in mind that the information I present below is a personal opinion based on my experience so far. If you have a favorite lens of yours for wedding photography that is not listed below, please feel free to add a comment on the bottom of the page with some information and pictures (if you have any that you would like to share).
1) Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S
The first on the list is my (and Lola’s) most favorite lens for wedding photography – Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S. We like it for four main reasons: it is sharp, colorful, lightweight and the bokeh it produces is outstanding.
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S
I have always been a fan of the 50mm primes. The older Nikon 50mm f/1.4D is also excellent, but the heptagon-shaped bokeh it produces is a little distracting, so I like the newer “G” version instead. On a full-frame body, the 50mm focal length is ideal and you can capture both beautiful portraits and full-size body shots if you stand a little away from your subjects. It works equally well on a DX body, but the focal length can be a little long, which is certainly a disadvantage when working in tight spaces. If I were only allowed to use one lens for weddings, I would certainly pick the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G. See a detailed Nikon 50mm f/1.4G Review for more information on this lens. Here are some image samples from it:
Nikon released a much cheaper, compact and lighter 50mm lens in 2011 – the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G. It actually performs better than the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G in many ways, so I would recommend to get the f/1.8G model instead.
2) Nikon 85mm f/1.4D/G
If you want the best-looking, creamy bokeh, check out the Nikon 85mm f/1.4G or the older Nikon 85mm f/1.4D, our second most favorite lens for wedding photography. Most photographers associate the word bokeh with this lens for a reason – it is the king of background blur. It is also one of the sharpest lenses from Nikon, producing outstanding results at maximum aperture of f/1.4.
Nikon 85mm f/1.4D
At maximum aperture the depth of field is so shallow, that if you stand too close to your subject and focus on the eye, the nose gets out of focus. I typically shoot between f/2.0 and f/2.8 for portraits and f/4.0 every once in a while if I need more depth of field. Lola also loves it and she has been using it a lot for her portrait sessions and weddings lately.
See my detailed Nikon 85mm f/1.4G Review for more information on this lens.
3) Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II
I got my hands on the new Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II as soon as it became available, because I knew that it would be much better than the old one, which I always enjoyed shooting with. The nice thing about the 70-200mm, is that it gives you so much focal length to play with.
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8G ED VR II
When you shoot with prime lenses like the Nikon 50mm or Nikon 85mm, you almost have to engage with people, because they will certainly note your presence due to your proximity. The Nikon 70-200mm allows you to capture subjects from a distance in their natural state, without drawing their attention to you. It is a very versatile lens and it works great with all Nikon teleconverters, if you feel that the focal length is not sufficient. Sharpness and color are outstanding at all focal lengths and the bokeh on the 70-200mm is also superb. The only complaint that I have about the 70-200mm is its weight – Lola never uses it because it is too painful to carry. Periodic shooting with this lens is not as bad, but I had a lot of back pain after shooting our last wedding with it all day long…not something I want to do again. Combine the weight of a pro-level body like Nikon D3s and it becomes one heavy combo. Check out my review of the 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II that I posted a while ago.
4) Nikon 24mm f/1.4G AF-S
If you want to see the sharpest Nikon lens ever produced, check out the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G! This gem has not been leaving my bag ever since I put it on my camera. I have been using it for all kinds of photography, including nature photography and weddings, and the 24mm focal length is very useful for full body and group shots or when working in tight space environments.
Nikon 24mm f/1.4G AF-S
While it is not designed to be a great portrait lens like the 85mm or 70-200mm lenses, it can certainly do the job quite well in the bokeh department with its maximum aperture of f/1.4. Just like other f/1.4 prime lenses, it is great for low-light situations, especially towards the end of the wedding when the amount of ambient light diminishes to very challenging levels. Check out my in-depth review of the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G if you have not seen it already for more information.
5) Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G
The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G has been one of my favorite lenses for landscape photography ever since it was released. While it is not as sharp as the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G and suffers from heavy distortion/vignetting between 24mm-28mm focal lengths, its versatility to zoom all the way to 70mm compensates for the problems. I rediscovered this lens when I started photographing people and I have been very pleased with the beautiful and colorful images it creates. It is certainly not a lens of choice for isolating subjects and creating beautiful bokeh, but if you stand close enough to your subject and shoot at f/2.8 and use focal lengths above 35mm, you will get pretty impressive results.
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G
The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G is a great lens for photographing full body shots and it does equally well when taking pictures of groups. I wrote a detailed Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 Review, comparing it with both Nikon 24mm f/1.4G and Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G.
We heavily rely on all of the above lenses for our wedding photography. When it comes to wide-angle lenses, I typically take either the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G or the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G, but not both. I know that many wedding photographers also enjoy fisheye and tilt-and-shift lenses for weddings, but I have not yet had much experience with them, so I cannot comment. If you have other favorite lenses for your portrait/wedding photography, please let us know in the comments section below!
About Nasim Mansurov
Useful information. How about Canon lenses? Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S better than Canon EF 50 /1,4 USM? Do you use Canon lenses?
Otabek, I have friends that use Canon, but I personally do not…I’m sure both Canon and Nikon 50mm lenses perform equally well.
I have used both and they are not even closely similar.. Canon 50mm f/1.4 is a much worse comparing to Nikon’s equivalent!
Thank you for the information! I had no idea the Canon 50mm f/1.4 was worse…I know the 50mm f/1.2 is a superb lens, but I don’t know much about the f/1.4.
Nasim,
I love your website and all the articles on here have been super helpful. I have been thinking about gettting into Wedding photopgrahy, but I am debating between a few lenses.
Currently I am running a D90 w/ 70-200mm VRII, 18-200mm VR, and a 50mm 1.4. My debate is between the 24mm 1.4 or the 24-70mm. I love my 50mm prime lens and have no problems getting up close with clients or moving around. Also, if I do make the jump I will be purchasing a new body like next generation D700 (D800?), and put my wife on the D90 as backup/secondary.
Phillip
Phillip, thank you for your feedback!
If your goal is to be a wedding photographer, then I would say the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G would be more useful than the 24-70mm for two reasons: speed/low-light capability and ability to isolate subjects at close distances (bokeh). It is really a phenomenal lens and it will work even better on the D700 that you are planning to upgrade to in the future.
Thanks for the quick response. I think your, the 24mm would be a better choice for multiple reasons. Looking forward to seeing some new lens reviews!
I just got a nikon d80 and I was wondering if I could use the nikkor 50mm AF-S f/1.4G
Also, are those lens good for taking close up pictures of insects and flowers? I can’t afford to buy all these lens so, I was wonder if those lens are best for general picture taking.
Chiemi, of course the 50mm f/1.4G will work with the D80. In fact, it will work with any modern Nikon DSLR.
HI,i am a new photographer,I have Nikon D7000,As a pilot I like to shot from aircraft,what kind of lens best for me??
I shot aerial photos for seven years from my Cessna Skylane with the pilot’s window open. I use nothing but Nikon cameras & accessories (currently D80 & 18-200 AF-S lens). Any good quality zoom telephoto is OK. You will quickly recognize the benefits of the zoom.
Always use a circular polarizer filter. Rest your left hand holding the camera on the window ledge for support, keep the body of the camera inside the plane with only the lens out through the window. Keep the strap around your neck. My Skylane was steady as a rock with no wind but I did some steering with my knees. 2,000 AGL or lower (I know, I know!) is the best overall altitude depending on your subject.
Good luck!
Dave
Thank you very much for your response, it helps me a lot.
I want to buy AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II,It will good Nikon D7000?
I want to buy AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II,It will good for Nikon D7000?
I have not yet get the 50mm f1.4G. Partly because I am considering Sigma 50mm f1.4. Based on reviews and feedback, Sigma focus much faster and creamy bokeh at wide open. But is heavy and have focusing issue, though the focusing can be re-calibrate back at Sigma.
Nikon 50mm is sharp and lightweight. I am leaning towards NIkon for its QC.
One thing I realize is that both are having good resell price in the market, so it seems Sigma 50mm is competitive.
I am on the fence. Probably will try out both soon before I cash in.
Dennis
Dennis, I’m not a fan of Sigma glass due to their frequent QA problems…I would still go for the Nikon.
do you have the 50mm 1.4 on your camera the whole time at the wedding or the 24-70mm 2.8???
Long Khun Chung, my wife has the 50mm f/1.4G on hers the whole time – I shoot with different lenses and 24-70mm is one of them.
hola que tenga buen dia. disculpe yo tengo una camara nikon d 3000 con lente 18-55 puedo tomar fotos grupales o que lente me recomendaria para tomar fotos grupales soy de mexico mi correo es eldios75@hotmail.com espero sus consejo gracias
Sorry, but I don’t speak Spanish. Please post your question in English.
hola juan,
Su Nikon D3000 con objetivo 18-55 funcionará bien para las fotos de grupo.
Hi Nasim,
Thanks for your post – absolutely loved the sample photos! I am starting to get into wedding photography and was wondering if you use your 50mm f1.4G AF-S more or 85mm f/1.4G more at a wedding?
I have a D60 and will probably upgrade in the next 2-3 years. At the moment, I am considering:
85mm f/1.8D AF or
50mm f/1.4G AF-S
I know that I can’t autofocus with the 85mm 1.8, but heard amazing things about the lens given the price when paired with other nikon bodies that can autofocus (good when I upgrade). Of course, 50mm f/1.4 will give fabulous shots but obviously focal length will not be the same. Which do you use more?
I am wanting to use the prime with my D60, for now, to practice taking photos of people (especially children) in weddings. The focal length can come in handy when I don’t want to get in people’s way, but do you think 50mm (which is ~75mm on D60) is enough? I know that I should eventually have both 85 and 50 in my bag but which one would you recommend given my current situation?
Thanks in advance. Will keep on reading as this place is a fantastic resource!
Jackie
Thank you Jackie!
In terms of 50mm vs 85mm – we certainly use the 50mm more often. The 85mm is a specialized lens that is only for portraits, while the 50mm is an “all-around” lens that works for portraits and other shots (details, groups, etc). Since you are shooting DX, the 50mm might still be a little too long for full body and group shots, so I would get a wider lens for those situations as well. I would certainly recommend the 50mm f/1.4G over 85mm f/1.8D. Have you ever tried to manually focus a lens on the D60? It would be very difficult (especially at large apertures), so I certainly recommend to use an autofocus lens instead.
I’m not a pro event photographer, but I had the opportunity to shoot a family event with my D90 and rented nikon 17-55 f2.8. From what I see, it’s a great lens for events and I would go with it, if I have only one lense with me.
Liju, the Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 is a great lens, but it only works on DX…most wedding photographers end up getting a full frame body, so I don’t consider it to be good investment.
Hi, does Nikon 50mm f1.4G compatible with nikon D5000?
Yes, absolutely.
What about 35mm f/1.8G? Is it good for bokeh?
Sorry, I somehow missed your comment. The 35mm is pretty good, but not as good as the 50mm.
I also use 14-24mm a lot for wedding photography! I know that it’s not at all a typical wedding lens. Anyway, it is amongst the sharpest lenses ever and it’s possible to create such a lovely effect with this lens.. I just love it!
I agree – the Nikon 14-24mm is superb and certainly comes handy for close-ups and other interesting shots. I would certainly carry one in my bag, but it is so darn heavy…carrying both the 24-70mm and 14-24mm would cause a lot of back pain :)
Nasim you are awesome…wish I could learn from you directly.
Sourav, thank you!
Are these lenses best suited for FX camera’s? If so, what do you suggest for DX camera’s and if I wanted to pursue event photography would you suggest upgrading from my d90 to the d7000 or d300s or do you think going full frame is the best best.
Also what is your suggestion for taking my hobby to the next level. There is still alot i dont understand when it comes to the camera and post editing. Do you think attending a local camera shops intro to photography would be a good start. taking local classes?
Allan, I apologize for a late response.
All of the above lenses work very well on both DX and FX lenses. If you will be doing serious event photography work, I would certainly suggest to go FX. You can get started with the Nikon D700 and grow from there. With event photography, you will need to work a lot in low-light environments and FX sensors certainly have an advantage over DX.
You can learn a lot from Internet resources and you can take some virtual classes with pre-recorded videos. Attending a class or a workshop would certainly be useful, since you can ask questions.
@ Allan,
I am seriously considering the D7000. I am very new to the DSLR world so I won’t be able to give you much hints.
However from researches I noticed that Nikon seems to get a harder push towards DX camera as they are launching ranges optimised for DXs.
@ Nasim,
Have you ever had success doing HD video shoots during weddings and if so, would you recommend any special lens?
Cheers,
Freddy @ Inmarketingwetrust
Freddy, yes, the Nikon D7000 is excellent (which means that the new pro generation DSLRs will be even better). In terms of HD videos, I have taken a few short video clips, but nothing serious. It is not so much the lens that matters, but your video recording technique and equipment (stabilizer, microphone, etc).
Great site you got here!
Wish I could find some more time myself for things like this.
i also do a lot of weddingph. My favorite combo is the D3x with the 24-70 and the d3s with the 70-200 VRII. I carry these almost for the whole wedding. Got the af-s 50 1.4, on my D3s when the light goes out.
Now I´m planning to get my hands on the 85 1,4 for the some really shallow dof shoots and the 24 1.4 for those dim light mood shoots.
comparing with your list it looks like we got the same workhorses for weddingph.
Once again, thanks for a good site!
Marcus
Thank you Marcus!
You have a very nice setup there! All cameras and lenses are top of the class.
The 85mm f/1.4G + 24mm f/1.4G would certainly find good spots in your camera bag. The lenses are exceptionally good – you might find yourself leaving the 24-70mm at home (which is what I have been doing lately), although I do like the 24-70mm lens a lot!
Hi Nasim,
My absolute favorite super wide angle for weddings is 16-35VR (I have 14-24 also but it is used mostly for interiors)! I can shoot entire wedding with it accompanied with 70-200VRII on another body… For stationary subjects VRII makes it 4 stops faster from F4 (in speed equivalent – F1!) I can shoot sharp images at 1/4 all the time!
Just a thought… ;o)
Karen.
Hi Nasim, thanks for sharing your valuable experience with us. Also, I am a new in the weddingph field and for next year (wedding season) I am intending to get some minimum equipment.
Here are my thoughts, maybe you and the other guys who posted above, can let me know yours opinions.
Body- D700 now or shall I wait until March 2011 when D800 comes up?
1.50mm f1.4
2.70-200 f2.8
3. Wide angle lens.
For wide angle lens, I am not sure what to take.
a) I would prefer 16-35 f4 but I do not know if I can shot with it in low light (churches, reception,dance floor) …and here guys who used this lens, especily Karen who like it very much, would you please be so kind and do let me know how it works in dim light this lens? How to use it? I know that you can shot at 4 stops down but if the models/subjects will move(dance) is it possible? Or when it can be used at 4 stops down?
b) Another option which I love it very much is 24 f1.4: Here, again I am not sure if I can cover a full wedding only with this prime lens for wide angle shots (groups,tight rooms). Please, share with me your experience about this lens.
c) And last option would be to get 24-70 f2.8. But, I do not like too much this lens, I would prefer to have another one with more wide angle for which to get more fun.
4. Please, feel free to add any other lens for the rest of the equipment which is a must due to the budget limitation.
Many thanks in advance and I will appreciate any feedback from all of you.
Good luck guys and take care,
ValiG
Vali, I don’t think Nikon will release a Nikon D800 in March – D4 is supposed to come out in March, which would put D800 to summer of 2011 (unless you have some other information).
I would just go with the D700 now, especially considering how much Nikon is giving in rebates in the US. Are you located in US?
In terms of lenses, your choice of lenses is pretty good – that’s what I shoot with (50 & 70-200). For wide-angles, either the 16-35mm or the 24mm would work great. The 24mm is much more expensive, but would certainly produce superior results than the 16-35mm. And yes, I could shoot the whole wedding with just the 24mm (which I have done in the past) to cover the wide angles.
Karen, the Nikon 16-35mm VR is a superb piece of glass – have you had a chance to check out my review of it? That VR certainly works magic, I was very impressed with it. If only Nikon incorporated VR into all other wide-angle and prime lenses…especially the 50mm and 85mm primes – that would be awesome!
To Vali Goaga,
I’ve been shooting weddings in the past 3 years with DX cameras and lenses:
Fuji S5 and D90
17-55 2.8 Nikkor
30mm 1.4 Sigma
85mm 1.8 Nikkor
Sb600 + Sb800
I added the D700 a few months ago and with it the 20mm 2.8 and 105 f2 DC.
Looking at the nice effects an ultra wide can provide if used properyl in nice environments (the couple’s session: sunsets, old buildings, etc) I’m revising my set to:
D700
16-35 f4 (for the event and couple’s session)
50 1.4 AF-S (details, couple’s dance, cake, couple’s session)
85 1.8 AF-D (couple’s session, half and full body. Maybe later upgrading to 85 1.4 AF-S)
Nasim and every wedding Pro is mentioning 24-70 + 70-200 but that’s a lot of weight and money and you still need the 50 1.4 and an ultra wide in the 18-20mm range. I’ve been experiencing, reading and thinking a lot and I’ve come up with the above set. Hope it helps!
Take care!
Genti
Genti, you have a nice list of lenses. You are right, the 24-70 + 70-200 are definitely heavy and not for everyone to use, especially on a large camera like D3s. Lately I have been leaving my 24-70mm and taking the 24mm f/1.4G instead though – love primes!
Many thanks Genti for your feedback…I will go in the beginning with the followings:
D700
16-35 f4 (for the event and couple’s session)
50 1.4 AF-S (details, couple’s dance, cake, couple’s session)
and later with 85 f1.4 and maybe 70-200 f2.8.
Again, I am not sure how good 16-35 f4 will be when the people dance/move around.
Also, any other guy who can advice me is very welcome.
Thanks, Vali
Vali, good choice of lenses!
The 16-35mm is an excellent lens, I certainly liked it a lot.
Vali,
The flash will freeze the movement, it’s ok.
I’m already shooting the receptions with the 17-55 2.8 at crop mode with my D700 and I’m rarely using it at 2.8 because of the narrow depth of field; all the time at f4 and iso 400-640.
When I want environment light, i switch to 50mm 1.4, iso 1000-1600 getting a speed of 1/150-1/200 so i can freeze movement (somehow, because you can only freeze movement at 1/500th of the second).
Genti
Thanks a lot Genti for your advice and I appreciate very much all your valuable feedback guys.
Nasim, congratulation with this site, you have a lot of visitors and they are very helpful with comments and advices and also I have read almost all your tutorials related to photography :).
Regards, Vali
Vali, sorry for a late reply and thank you for your feedback once again!
Good luck with your photography.
I am selling all my canon gear and getting a d7000
These lens will be used 95% for wedding photography.
What lens should I get from list below and you can add to it, if you like
50mm 1.8D – I am told this will work on a d7000 with autofocus
or 50mm 1.4G – I am not sure which to get.
Either 17-55 2.8 or 16-35 f4 or 24-70 2.8
Also 70-200 2.8 VR – What is the differance between First and Second Versions of this lens?
Would you recommend the 35 1.8, 50 1.8, or 85 1.8 for creamy Bokeh? Remember this is for a 1.5 crop
I think I have figured out what I am going to get for now.
The d7000
35mm 1.8 – 50mm 1.8d – 70-200 2.8 VR – and a flash
Any thoughts or Comments
Hi Justin,
I think you need an wide angle lens for groups and tight rooms. The 35 1.8 on DX (D7000) will be ~ 50mm.
70-200 2.8 VR seems to be a good choice.
Good luck, Vali
I just shot with an amazing wedding photographer in Florida, I am now going to shoot mostly primes. I have changed my list to 20mm 2.8, 35mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8d, 85mm 1.8d, 135 f2 dc, and a 80-200 2.8d
Justin, primes are definitely great for wedding photography, but I would not get too many of them. You also have to consider the time and conditions for changing so many lenses…
Hi Nasim, I wrote on your nikkor 200m f/2.0 review but here is the place for the question that I have. basically I need your advice in my future purchase of lenses. I currently have a D300 w/grip, nikkor 50m f/1.8 and tamron 17-50m vc. I plan to invest in my gear, for weddings and mostly portraits in open areas like parks. Here is one option: (these lenses are for the D700FX)
1-24m f1.4
2-16-35m vr f/4
3-85m f/1.4
4-70-200m vrII
5- 200m vrII f/2.0 or 300m vrII for portraits in open areas. I have a doubt here I can use the 200m f/2.0 for the nice bokeh and if I need more reach I can use it on my D300 and becomes a 300m f/2.0 or with a TC1.4 becomes a 280m f/2.8. I had read reviews on these two lenses and both have very positive reviews. any suggestions are very welcome. Thank you again Nasim for your great web page :-)
Ignacio, sorry for a late response – I posted my reply on the 200mm article :)
Hi Nasim,
First, I’d like to thank you for sharing your knowledge with the rest of the world! Thank you!
I am graduating from the point-n-shoot camera and I am in the process of researching the best DSLR for me. I have pin point it to Nikon d90 OR Nikon d5000. I am mostly going to take photo’s of my dog, around the house, myself and husband, and we also travel, therefore I would like to just take great quality images. My question is, if I were to purchase the d5000 what great lense (s) would you prefer for a beginner like myself that will work great with taking pictures of my dog and/or just traveling to Las Vegas with my girlfriend’s? And same goes for the d90 if I were to make a purchase on that? I am not so sure which camera to get because I feel as though the d90 produces better pictures. I am a bit conflicted on the two cameras and if you could also help me with that. Cost was an issue but if the d90 is truly better I can save money and go for the d90.
Any help is very much appreciated!
I would either, get a D40 or a D90 with a 18-55 VR Kit lens, and maybe a 50mm 1.8 later on down the road to start. If you are just taking pictures of your friends, and your dog etc…. you do not need any higher level DSLR. You would probably never use any of the features that the other more expensive cameras have. Then try shooting in P mode (Program) this will be better than the Green BOX ( Auto .) The more you shoot the better you will get.
Justin
Justin, thank you for your suggestions – 100% agree with you.
Asiangirl,
I agree with Justin here – why waste money on expensive cameras if you are only taking pictures of your family? I would even look at some of the point and shoot cameras that are capable of delivering great pictures…
If you want to get a DSLR, get a lower-end model like Nikon D3100 (D5000 is now discontinued).
Hi Nasim,
I find your page very interesting and I love the images you have posted on there. So firstly, thank you for sharing all these with us :)
By looking at your images, I often wonder what camera settings you have chosen.
I am particularly interested in the first shot (group picture) underneath the description of the 24mm lens and the second shot underneath your 24-70mm review. What shutter speed/aperture did you use ? Did you use any external lighting ? And for taking group pictures, how far away or close should one stand to the group in your recommendation.
I am using a Nikon D90 and a 18-200mm lens and I am trying to find out how I can make the best use of it’s focal length
Kind regards, Chris
Chris, thank you for your feedback!
If you want to see what settings I used to shoot a particular picture, simply view the EXIF information on each picture – I intentionally leave the EXIF data for my readers to learn from. As for using external lighting, I do occasionally use off-camera flash for portraiture.
For group pictures, the distance between you and the group depends on you focal length and aperture. The shorter the focal length, the closer you can stand to people (you can read my articles on depth of field and aperture if you need more info).
Nasim, great site! I am exteremely green behind the ears and just purchased a Nikon D7000, my first DSLR. It came with the standard lens kit. I have read about the 50mm lenses and am quite keen to get one. Which would you advise the 50mm 1.8D (do i need to get the one that focuses?) or 50mm 1.4G – I am not sure which to get.
I have children that dont keep still for photos (hah!) what sort of lenses would you recommend?
Hello everyone!
I’m intending to purchase either a D90 or D7000 … which single lense would you recommend? I’d like to have a some wide and zoom capability with good low light feature. I realise I’ll probably need a few lenses to achive this but is there a lense out there that’s capable of all the above?
Jack, I would recommend purchasing two lenses – one wide-angle zoom and one prime lens like Nikon 50mm f/1.4G for portraiture. There is no “single lens” solution that will give you great results. You can check out the Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G VR lens, but being an all-purpose lens, it is not a low-light lens and certainly not suitable for portraiture.
Jay, if budget is not an issue, I would personally go for the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G – it is a great lens and certainly one of my favorites. It is a great lens for taking pictures of children!
Thanks Nasim … appreciate the prompt reply … however, does the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G lense come with a VR feature? If it doesn’t will this be an issue as I’d rather not be carrying a tripod along.
I wonder if a combination of a standard Nikon 18-55mm VR (for indoor/daylight shots) plus the 50mm f/1.4G (low light) lenses do the trick …. this way I don’t have to spend too much money as I heard the 18-55mm takes pretty decent shots provided there’s enough light and this lense could also come in handy indoors with its wide angle … and if at all lighting is an issue I can always switch to the 50mm
Thank you Nasim
Jack, the 50mm f/1.4G does not have VR. In fact, none of the Nikon prime lenses shorter than 105mm have VR in them. Don’t worry about using a tripod with the 50mm – it is a fast lens.
And yes, I would certainly recommend getting the Nikon 18-55mm + Nikon 50mm f/1.4G combo. The 18-55mm would be for wide-angle and everyday shots, while the 50mm would be your portrait lens.
Hello! Great site!
I didn’t see much talk about ceremony photography – in a dimly lit church.
I do great with groups outside but I want to improve my photography during the actual ceremony and the ‘family formals’ that are all taken in the church.
Which lens do you suggest for this application?
THANKS!
Smiles,
Laura
Laura, a fast lens like Nikon 50mm f/1.4G would certainly help, but it all depends on how dim the church is. I have been to some churches where the light is just not enough for any lens – you would definitely need to use flash for those situations.
I was wondering what you think of this lense?
Nikon AF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED DX VR II Zoom Lens
My 16-85mm is having issues with the image dropping in the viewfinder and causing a blurry image 1 out of every 5 to 10 shots. And although I have sent it in to Nikon they say nothing is wrong with it. Anyway, I can tough it out doing house shots with this lense but I cannot chance it at a wedding. So currently I also own a Nikon 50mm 1.8, a Tokina 11-16 2.8 and then my 16-85 which is no longer reliable.
So I have been looking at the 18-200 because I would like to have a very versitile all round lense but I’m also on a budget. What is your take? Thanks so much!
Tara, I personally would not get the 18-200mm for weddings. It is slow and has all kinds of problems at focal lengths above 105mm.
If you need to cover the telephoto side (you already have the Tokina for wide-angle shots), then get the older Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8. It is more expensive than the 18-200mm, but it is well worth the money for what it can do. It will serve you well during weddings.
Hello! This post is much needed!! Thank you for this! I have a question if you could help?
I’m doing mainly family portraits at the moment, children, babies, couples etc..I started recently and I’m having lots of requests to do weddings. I reject my first 2, cause I didn’t feel I was ready to take that leap. But I have agree to do one in March ( with a 2nd photographer). Now, Im not using a full frame camera and I love my 50mm 1.4. But I seriously need an upgrade as well as a good lens for the wedding. Which lens you would recommend as a MUST? Should I focuse on a zoom lens ( as the 70-200mm? or 24-70?) or like you mentions get another prime like the 24mm?. Should I get just one? or do I need 2 more?? ( other than my 50mm)
Also, though im with Nikon now, and love it, My choice will be to stay with it as I know the system to upgrade for the Nikon d700 or maybe go for the canon 5d mark II wich is cheaper for me at the moment….any suggestions?? Much appreciatted!!
http://www.facebook.com/veronicajamesphotography
Veronica, if you are seriously considering doing weddings in the future, then I would invest in an FX body like Nikon D700 with zoom lenses like 24-70mm and 70-200mm. If you cannot afford both lenses now, just get the 24-70mm, since you already have the 50mm for portraits. Nikon is still running rebates on D700 body + lenses and if you get both lenses, you can save $800 now, which is a killer price. Here is a link to Nikon rebates.
Hope this helps!
Thank you so much!! I was just trying the D700 the other day! Is a dream!
Hi,
What is your opinion about nikon 85mm 1.8d vs 50mm 1.4g. Which would be the best lens for children action portrait.
Newton, I would get the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G.
Hi Nasim,
I’m just starting out with weddings so thanks for all the great tips! Your photos are beautiful!! I just purchased the Nikon 50mm 1.4G. I can’t wait to get it so I can start playing with it. I do have one question though, should I use a UV filter or not? I get conflicting answers. Some people swear by them for protection but others say using the hood for protection is better as the filter adds glare etc. What are your thoughts?
Thank you for your feedback Siri! Definitely get the UV filter. Not so much because it gives you extra protection, but because it is easier to clean the lens with a filter. The 50mm has a weird front design, where there are “layers” of black plastic before the lens element. Cleaning the lens can be a real pain and you will certainly leave a lot of stuff on those black layers while cleaning. With a UV filter, you don’t have this problem and cleaning the lens will be very easy.
Hi Nasim,
thanks for this wonderful post i got a lot of ideas to begin with…i’m just a beginner with a Nikon D90 w/ the folowing lenses tokina 11-16mm,nikor 18-200mm VR II,nikor 50 mm 1.8f and just want to know what is lacking here…..if i were to photoshoot some wedding events considiring my budget im from the philippines by the way lenses is much more expensive right here….and if i were to get another camera body what do you prefer in order to take it to the next level….hoping for your comments,,,….Merry X’mas
Allan, if you are serious about wedding photography, then you will need a full-frame body like Nikon D700. I would definitely upgrade your lenses as well…
Hi!
I see you get many questions, so I totally understand if you haven’t got the time to answer my comment. I just wonder… I’ve got a D300 and I’m thinking about buying a 50 mm 1.4G. Can I shoot people moving around without getting blurry pics? Which camera did you use for the pictures above (example-pics for 50 mm 1.4)? Will my pics be even near yours in quality? ;)
Btw, I’m from Norway and my english isn’t that good… Hope you understand what I just wrote. ;)
I think no lens of any focal length or cost will get you sharp pictures, if you are not shooting with a fast enough shutter speed. Also if the aperture is not set with the correct DOF. I would try testing different shutter speed and apertures and see what works for you. I would start at 1/250 of a second, and f/4 aperture.
Best of luck, Justin
I agree with Justin here – motion blur is the result of a slow shutter speed.
Eli, 50mm f/1.4G is a great lens! Of course you can capture people moving without getting blurry pictures, but it all depends on the amount of ambient light. If you are shooting outside, you can use fast shutter speeds. If you are shooting indoors, you might need to use flash…
For the 50mm images above, Lola and I used the Nikon D700 full-frame camera. In terms of image quality, it all depends on your technique…
Hello!
I’m hoping you can all help me out. I have gotten into wedding photography and currently shoot with a Nikon D90. I’m going to invest in the D7000 (use my D90 as a back-up) and would like to know which lenses to purchase.
I have:
50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor Lens
18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-S DX VR ED Nikkor Lens
Any advice??
Thank you in advance!
I’ve narrowed it down and from what I’m reading…the Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 sounds like a good lens to get to compliment my 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor Lens and my 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6.
Others I’ve been reading is: Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8 or Sigma 70-200 or Sigma 18-50mm.
Thoughts? I love your article and would love to hear back from anyone on your thoughts!
Sharon, it all depends on your budget. If I were you, I would rather keep the D90 without upgrading to D7000 and get a good lens instead. Yes, the 80-200mm is excellent, but it lacks the much-needed VR for low-light situations in weddings. If you skip the body upgrade, you can get yourself the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II, which is a superb lens for weddings…
hi, im going to upgrade my gear to d90 or 550d(canon still not sure which)
and i would like to know which lens you recommend for street photography and for partys
i have a low budget unfortunly.. so im un able to buy too many lenses.
thank you. hope to hear your answer:)
Sarit, get the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G.
Hi Nasim,
I’m getting into wedding photography. Is nikkor 80-200 af-d a useful wedding lens (ceremony) – I can buy one quite cheap, along with 24 2,8, but I have doubts about the lack of VR. Is VR so much helpful? Planning to use it on d700, so I can crank up the ISO. I also have 50 AF-s, and 105 micro VR. Thanks
Tom, I personally consider VR to be extremely important for weddings, since you will be shooting 100% hand-held. The Nikon 80-200mm is a superb lens, but lack of VR makes it a not so very useful lens for indoors wedding photography, especially when shooting at long focal lengths. Your D700 can surely help with its high ISO capabilities, but not so much in dim environments, especially in churches. I would shop around and see if you can find the older 70-200mm VR I at a good price.
Hi
May I know if you ranked lenses in order of preference?
I’m currently undecided between the 50mm f/1.4G and the 24-70mm. I know it’s unfair to compare these 2, but I already have the 17-35 + 70-200mm focal range covered. So I would like to get a lens in the 50mm range.
So my question is, is the 50mm f/1.4G as sharp as the 24-70mm when they are both at f/2.8? And is the 50mm f/1.4G sharp at f2.0?
Thank you very much!
Hi Nasim,
I adore your photos!! And thank you for all the information!! I currently have a Nikon D80 and use Nikons 18-200mm lens. Not good for weddings at all. I’m upgrading to the Nikon D700 and will use the D80 for back up. Which two lens would you recommend to use throughout the wedding day? Which ones would you use in the following situations: bride getting ready, ceremony, park, group shots, and reception? Thanks for any advice you can give.
I should also mention that I would like to achieve photos with great color and sharpness, but also Bokeh sometimes.
Great info and I concur with your thoughts on Nikon lenses most of which I have been using for the last 9 months. Also love the images you have captured.
Steve
Steve, thank you for your feedback! :)
Thanks for sharing this information very helpful.
You are most welcome Tessa!
Amazing website, I’m so happy I came across it, a lot of valuable information. I have a question regarding wide angle lens for group shots. Have you ever worked with nikkor 20mm 2.8 and if yes what’s your opinion about it?
Considering buying it, I’m very curious what you think about it.Thank you, back to reading your reviews.
Anna, the Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D is a classic and it will work great for your group shots, as long as you have a Nikon D90 and above DSLR. If you have an entry-level DSLR, it won’t autofocus.
hey Nasim
It feels great to read about your reviews and topics.i know with digital photography post processing is very important,it would be really helpful if u could point some light on adobe CS5 ,and how to star t of using CS5 as a beginner..
thank you and regards
siju
Siju, CS5 is too big to cover in an article – I would recommend to buy one of those “Photoshop for dummies” books to get yourself familiarized with it.
What about the 35? Is 24 better than 35 or it is about the same?
Jessie, it depends on your shooting style – I personally really like the 24mm for its wide angle.
One more question for you. Which one has a better looking for low-light, the 24 or 35?
Jessie, they both perform equally well in low-light.
Hi Nasim, between 35mm and 50 mm f1.4G, which one is better for shooting moments in weddings?
Kent, it depends on your shooting style and your budget. The 50mm is a great value. Optically, the 35mm is sharper at f/1.4 than the 50mm. If you have never owned a 50mm, I would start with it first :)
Hi Mr. Mansurov,
I find your reviews very helpful. Well, I’m planning to invest on these equipments for Wedding/Hobbyist/Landscape photography. I hope you would be able to give your comment:
1. Wide: Nikon 24mm f/1.4G
2. Portraiture: Nikon 50mm f/1.4G (or the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Lens)
3. Telephoto Zoom: Nikon 70-200mm VR1
4. Nikon D700 Body
5. D700 Body Grip (Is this recommended?)
On a side note, I would want to consider the 70-200mm VR2, but I’ve been hearing two critical issues about it:
1. Field Of View: Because the lens contracts, if you’re standing at the minimum focus distance and focusing on a subject at a focal length of 200mm, it’s not really 200mm but 135mm rendering a wider field of view.
2. Thread issues: Here’s the link for you to possibly read. I hope your 70-200mm VR2 doesn’t show the problem. http://trick77.com/2010/01/11/thread-issue-with-nikon-nikkor-70-200-2-8-vr-ii/
Hope you would be able to reply on my comment as soon as possible. Thank you & God Bless you.
Sorry Mr. Mansurov, I hope it’s okay for me to add on my inquiries:
3. Reviews all over tells me that the Nikon 70-200mm VR1 incorporates vignetting problems on a Nikon D700 at its widest aperture. If so, would you still be recommending it?
4. What if I drop by Nikon 70-200mm VR1 and consider either the Nikon 105mm VR Micro or the Nikon 135mm AF-DC for my telephoto prime in shooting weddings?
*Sorry for the many questions. I’m investing next week already and would really appreciate your advice on this. Thanks again.
Nathaniel, I apologize for a late response – I somehow missed your comment. The list of gear you want to buy is great, definitely something I would personally pick. The grip is nice to have, I personally have it.
Don’t worry about all the 70-200mm VR II issues. I upgraded from VR I and prefer the VR II version much more. The FoV issue is not a problem for me, since I do not shoot from a mile away. In fact, I prefer to be able to stand closer at 70mm, rather than constantly trying to stay back. As for thread issues, Nikon issued an official statement, where they confirmed that there is no problem with a thread – it is only visible due to the “loupe” effect. Those threads do not do anything harmful inside the lens. 70-200mm VR I has vignetting problems and VR II does not…
And lastly, 105mm and 135mm primes are not versatile enough for wedding photography. You cannot constantly be going back and forth, it is simply not practical.
I’ve been given an opportunity to be a second shooter / helper for weddings. The person I will shoot with has two bodies – generally one with a 50 mm and the other with a 80-200 and also has a 18-70.
I will be moving around a lot taking the side angles and other things. My question is — I have a 50 1.8, kit lens 18-105, 70-300, sb800 with a d7000. I would like to get a better lens and would like to know your thoughts – (I can only afford one at this time) 24-70, 85, or a 70-200VR1
Thanks very much!
Todd, I apologize for a late response – somehow missed your comment. If you want your shots to stand out from the other photographer, get the Nikon 85mm f/1.4G. The only problem is, it is almost impossible to find it… I pre-ordered with B&H and had to wait for 6 months to get mine!
Hi! I started photography as a hobby a year ago and friends have asked me to photograph them, not being able to afford a photographer. I have now done 3 weddings and have several planned before the end of the year. I am currently running on a Nikon D70s I picked up to learn with at a Pawn shop. The onl lens I have ever used is the 18-55mm it came with. I would like to upgrade my camera as well as pick up a 50mm lens. I’ve been looking at the d7000. Will that give me the professional quality images I am looking for?
You are welcome to check out my website, any advice would be appreciated!
Thank you,
Jennifer
Jennifer, I apologize for a late response.
Yes, the Nikon D7000 + Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is a great combo that will give you very good results.
I currently shoot with a Nikon D80 with an 18-200mm lens. I am doing a couple of weddings this summer and am thinking about getting a new lens. I also do a lot of family photos for other people and of my own family. I’d like to get tack sharp portraits but appreciate being able to stand back and not having people even know I am shooting. I really love to capture kids candidly. Do you recommend going with the 50mm portrait lens, a 24-70mm, or the 70-200? Since I’m not ready to upgrade the body yet, would all of those work on my D80? The first wedding is just a couple weeks away so I am hoping to make a decision quickly.
Thanks for all the great information!
If you like standing back and not having people know you are there, then a telephoto lens is what you want. Of the three choices you listed. I would recommend the 70-200 2.8. If you can afford the 70-200 VR I or VR II then I would purchase it. The Vibration Reduction will allow you to shoot in dimly lit conditions like weddings, because with VR you can shoot at slower shutter speeds and still have sharp images that are not blurred from hand held shooting. Also with a D80 remember your ISO sensitivity will not be that good, meaning your photos will be noisy (pixely) at higher ISO’s. So a flash would make all the difference in the world. If you do not own one, you can purchase a sb-28 flash for about $90 on ebay. Also if you can not afford the 70-200 I would look for a less expensive 80-200 AF-D or AF-S which is just as sharp as the 70-200 but lacks the VR technology. The $ you spend on lenses will always be worth it.
Best of Luck, Justin
Jessica, I agree with Justin – you should get the Nikon 70-200mm lens.
I love taking photos but i need help!
I have a NIkon 3100 with two lenses;
1 X AF-S 55-300 mm
1X AF -s 55 – 18 mm
i have to take some wedding photos. Can you please be so kind and help me how to ajust my settings on the camera to taking close up shots like hands and rings etc.
I also want to know what flash would be the best to buy and what other lense i need to get for the best shots. I realy do need some help.
Plaese send me you comment to my e-mail addres thepdprojects@telkomsa.net
Tina, sorry for a late response.
I personally would not shoot a wedding with the Nikon D3100 and your lenses. Unless you are doing this for fun or just helping out a friend, your camera gear is not good enough to photograph a wedding. You will need both a better camera and better lenses.
I’m definitely going to have to get the 24-70 and 70-200. What do you think of the 105mm 2.8 macro lens? Would it be any good for portraits?
- Lucas
If you are going to get the 70-200mm lens, then don’t worry about the 105mm f/2.8G VR. I love my 105mm f/2.8G VR, but like using the 70-200mm for headshots better.
I concur with your critique but also enjoy the Nikon ‘DC’ Sisters. The 105mm and her beautiful big sister, the 135mm f2 DC lenses.
DC lenses are superb and very sharp! Hopefully Nikon will update them soon with VR models…
Hi Nasim,
I am an amateur, also interested with semi-amateur wedding photography.
Recently I bought a D7000 and now trying to build/upgrade my nikon system. In the future, I’d like to be able to go FX .
I have a 50mm 1.8 AI, 28-80G, and a 70-300G lenses, (and F3HP, F65,) I like 28-80G especially, It is light, focuses fast-enough, good for travel.
As far as I understand, DX lenses are not good for an FX body or a film body. So, When buying new stuff try to avoid DX lenses.
First thing I got is 35mm F/2 D. I choose it over 50mm because. It is normal lens for DX. For FX slightly wide, but still counts as normal. It is my always-on lens. Now I’m having a 70-200 F/2,8 VRII . I borrowed it couple of times. I enjoyed it a lot.
For a while, wouldn’t 35mm + 70-200mm would be quite sufficient? For this setup, which lens would you consider next?
I appreciate you comments.
Mustafa
Mustafa, looks like you are covered from 28mm to 300mm, so why get more lenses? The Nikon 70-200mm is excellent and will serve you well in weddings. It is heavy, but very versatile.
Hi Nasim,
Thank you so much for your insight. It has helped me a lot this year as I get more serious about my photography.
I currently shoot on a D300 (eventually will upgrade to FX) and have the AF-S MICRO 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR and a 28-80 deeply in need of replacing. I’m thinking of supplementing with the AF-S DX 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED paired with the AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR. How do you think this kit would be for weddings and travel?
Thank you!
Zil, the 12-24mm + 24-120mm is a great combo! However, if you are planning to upgrade to FX, why waste your money on the 12-24mm? If I were you, I would get the Nikon 24-120mm f/4G or the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G at the moment, then get the Nikon 16-35mm f/4G or the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G later (if budget is an issue at the moment). Otherwise, you will have to sell the 12-24mm once you upgrade to FX…
Hello,
What is your opinion on the 35mm f/1.8
On a D7000 For portraits?
And is the D7000 whit a good lens good for weddings?
Luis, the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G is a great lens for the D7000. It is a very sharp lens and delivers excellent colors and performance, but if you are looking for beautiful bokeh, the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G will be a better choice…
As I have suggested in the above article, I would start with the 50mm prime.
Hi Nasim,
I have been asked to shoot a wedding, something I have always refused to do in the past, but since it is my niece I am trapped. ; )
I have the following cameras:
• Nikon D5000 with the stock 55-200mm 1:4-5.6G and 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G (both VR)
• Nikon D80 with 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6GII (VR)
• Nikon Speedlight SB-600
I am very concerned about proper exposure and will be purchasing the Gary Fong Lightsphere Collapsible Inverted Dome Diffuser.
Which camera would you use a wide-angle lens on and which one would you recommend? I read your article “Best Nikon Lenses for Wedding Photography” but am not sure which one would be right for me. Of course, budget is a major concern.
Any other suggestions or advice you have would be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!
Thank you,
Paul
Paul, you cannot refuse to do it for your niece! :)
As for the equipment, I would use the 18-55mm on your D5000 and get the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G to be used on your D80. The 50mm is a beautiful lens that you can capture some really nice portraits with. Once you use it, you will quickly understand what you have been missing :) There is also a cheaper f/1.8G version, but it is not yet available and won’t deliver as good of bokeh and colors as the 50mm f/1.4G.
hello Nasim,
I have Nikon DX90 and I use 18-55mm f/2.8G ED.
I have been asked to shoot my friend’s wedding.
Do you think camera equipment, would help me to capture the wedding?
Any advice :)
Thanks,
Nelly
Nelly, I apologize for a late response – looks like I have not been able to answer questions on this page lately.
I am assuming your camera is a D90 and your lens is the pro-level Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G. If that’s the case, then yes, you will be able to capture a wedding (which probably already happened), although I would recommend to get a good prime like the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G for portraits.
I shoot with a d700 and a 50 1.4 at this time. We second shot a wedding this weekend and used their gear. I mainly used the 70-200mm VRII (I know I need this) and a Tamron 28-75 2.8. My question is that I can justify the money for the 70-200mm at this time, but cannot for the Nikon 24-70. For only $500 bucks for the Tamron, would you consider this a reasonable purchase until I can afford the 24-70. My wife and I do shoot together so we will be getting another d700(d800?) in the future.
Also, what do you recommend for a macro lens? Give me the best option and then the best option that won’t break our wallet.
Paul, I apologize for a late response…not sure if you need my recommendation anymore :)
Anyway, while I personally have not had a chance to use the Tamron 28-75mm yet, I do have some friends that use Tamron lenses and their feedback is mixed. Some glass is good, while other has manufacturing defects. I personally would wait until I can afford good glass, instead of settling for average. Start off with the 70-200mm, then wait and get a good mid-range zoom later.
As for a macro lens, my favorite is the Nikon 105mm f/2.8G VR that I personally own and use. The VR helps when photographing details, because I do not have the time in weddings to set up a tripod. You have to be careful with focusing and depth of field, but once you learn how to use the lens, it is hard to find another one that can beat it. Many of the detail shots from weddings on Lola’s page were captured with the 105mm. Another good macro lens is the Nikon 60mm f/2.8G. It is cheaper than the 105mm, but you will have to physically come closer to your subject to get the macro details.
Hi Nasim,
I have been using D60 for the past years and planning to engage into WeddingPh. Would like to ask your expertise on camera body; I’ve read from your posts about D700 but can’t afford to buy it yet and thinking of considering D7000. Do you think the latter would suffice my needs at the moment. thank you so much for any reply.
Regards,
Karl
D7000 is definitely adequate for weddings. I have used D80 and D90 for weddings also and they are more than adequate as well. So you could save money and get a D90 and you would still be fine.
Thanks for the comment Jason.
Karl, sorry for a late response. As Jason pointed out below, the D7000 is a great camera, even for weddings.
Hi, Nasim, love the reviews on your site!
I’ve been searching everywhere and coming up with minimally useful info. Here’s my dilemma:
I’m going to be shooting a wedding for a family member who is getting married in short order, and they don’t have money for a photographer and basically asked if I could do it. I’ve been asked to shoot weddings before, but I’ve always refused because I don’t consider myself experienced enough or necessarily well equipped enough (particularly now). In this case, the couple’s option is between me and basically nobody/any family members who happen to bring point and shoots, etc. Since the wedding is coming up soon, and I just switched from Canon to Nikon, I only have the budget for one decent lens. I am planning to upgrade to full frame most likely when the d700 replacement comes out. Here’s my current minimal equipment:
D7000 and spare battery
50 1.8D
SB-900
Now my dilemma on lenses is this: I don’t want to get a dx lens if I can avoid it, although I’m not 100% against it. I don’t want to get the 17-55 2.8 dx because of this. In your opinion would the 16-35 f4 VR be reasonable to shoot most of a wedding with on a dx, being a 24-53 approximately, and despite being f4? Or would the 24-70 2.8 be a better pick, possibly picking up a cheaper wide lens for group shots?
The wedding itself is outdoors late afternoon, however the reception is in a somewhat dark venue, and it will be in the evening. Part of my thoughts on the 16-35 f/4 is that I will be using flash most of the time as well as the fact that the d7000 can get reasonably clean shots at speeds above 1600 iso, which should help negate the lack of wide aperture and assist in action stopping. My concerns are really the action stopping ability, as well as the limited zoom range versus the 24-70 2.8. My only concern with the 24-70 2.8 is that it won’t go wide enough on the dx for numerous shots, and that I might miss shots due to not being able to back up enough. I also considered the 14-24 2.8, but the limited range as well as the lack of lens protection/size/etc seems like it’s not a good choice for this. I’m comfortable using primes and simply moving a lot of the time, however I’m assuming at a wedding I won’t necessarily have the ability to really move everywhere to work with just a 50 1.8, and not having another body at the moment I don’t want to have to swap lenses too often. I also tend to frame shots wider than I need if I can’t get too close and then crop a bit later.
Sorry to type so much, I’m just very unsure of what to do, and I want to do as good a job as I can in this situation, while not spending a ton of money on a dx lens that won’t hold it’s value well and won’t really be useful on a full frame in a year or so.
Additionally, any idea how many shots you take on average for a wedding/reception? Just purely curious.
Thanks for any advice you can give!
Spike
Spike, I apologize for a late response…looks like I have been missing comments on this page for a while now.
As I have pointed out in my Nikon 24-70mm Review, I would not use it on a DX camera because it is not wide enough. The Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR, on the other hand, is perfect for DX. I would not get the massive 14-24mm either. If you want to get super wide, then the Nikon 12-24mm f/4 is also a great choice. I personally favor the 16-35mm over the 12-24mm though, because 16-35mm works on both DX and FX, whereas the 12-24mm is a DX-only lens.
Hope this helps and hope the wedding went well.
Thanks for the reply! Appreciate you taking the time, albeit late :) I ultimately went with the 24-70 2.8 because I was worried I’d be too far away at critical moments and would need the longer focal length. Unfortunately for me, you were absolutely right. The 24-70 ended up being tougher to use because it didn’t go wide enough. It wasn’t an issue at the ceremony, which was outdoors at a park, however the reception hall was tiny and very crowded. I ultimately couldn’t back up enough to get more than a waist up shot of anyone most of the time. I did manage a few full length shots, but they were rare because of the crowding. Overall I wasn’t too thrilled with the photos, but the bride and groom were happy, which is what matters.
After the wedding, I finally found a semi-local (3 hours away) camera store that had the 16-35 in stock for me to try, and you were absolutely right that it would’ve been a better choice. It’s now the next lens I’m planning on getting. With the flash, I rarely used the 24-70 wide open, particularly since most of the time I was focusing pretty close up and needed to keep my depth of field reasonably wide, which means the f4 probably wouldn’t have been an issue at all.
Thanks for the response, I appreciate your opinions on gear and equipment. Keep up the great work on this site, all your articles are well written and very informative!
Hello
This might sound like a dumb question
Do you use tripod/monopod for all the pictures you use on this discussion ?
I have a D7000 with a 50mm f/1.8
And I can’t seem to get clear pictures with out a tripod
Also do shoot raw or auto?
Thanks
I am only guessing here but I had a similar problem with my D3000. The auto-focus may not be working with that specific lense (a common problem for lower end bodies). Is the lense AF or AF-S? I had to buy the AF-S for the auto-focus to work….
Luis, lack of light and very low ISO are probably your problem. Try bumping up ISO to something like 800 or use Auto ISO and see if you can get better results. None of the images in this article have been taken with a tripod.
HI There,
I’m shooting a wedding in September and have the Nikon D300 along with the following equipment:
-SB900
-50 mm f1.4
-70-200 f2.8
-17-55 f2.8
-battery grip and extra battery
Eventually I want to upgrade to a full frame Nikon (hopefully when they come out with the next version of the D700) but, in the meantime I”m hoping to buy another lens.
Do you think I should get an 85mm f1.4 or one of the wide angle lenses (24mm f1.4) or the 24-70mm f2.8? I heard someone say earlier in one of these posts that you can’t use the 17-55 f2.8 on the full frame cameras. Is that true?
If so and I had to sell the 17-55mm f2.8, which lens would you replace it with?
Lastly, I”ve had some troubles with the 70-200 f2.8 in getting sharp photos especially at 200mm. Any suggestions? It’s my most expensive lens and I’m hesitant to use it in the wedding for fear of not getting sharp images.
Any help you can provide would be wonderful,
Anita
Anita, yes, your 17-55mm will only work in half resolution on a full frame body. If your plan is to move to full frame, then I would put it up for sale and replace it with an FX lens. The lens I recommend to replace it with is either Nikon 24-70mm or Nikon 16-35mm, if budget is an issue or you want wider angle on DX for now.
As for your 70-200mm, you need to watch your shutter speed when shooting at 200mm and make sure that you have a good hand-holding technique. When using VR, you have to give it a couple of seconds to stabilize before you shoot – otherwise you will end up with plenty of blurry images.
I have the D300 with a AF-S Nikkor 24-70 2.8G ED, AF Nikkor 50 1.4, AF-S Nikkor 14-24 2.8G ED, and a AF Nikkor ED 80-200 2.8. My next purchase will be the 85 1.4G. Can’t wait to get that lens! But on my D300 cropped sensor, the 50 1.4 I have is close to that I suppose!
John, nice selection of lenses you have there! The 85mm is a different class compared to 50mm. While your field of view on the 50mm might be close, the 85mm has completely different optics. Bokeh is creamy and beautiful.
Interesting debate. I used to shoot weddings with multiple bodies and 7 lenses. Now I shoot the entire wedding with one body and one lens, and my wedding photography has never looked better. Why? Because now I can devote 100% of my attention on the people in front of me and zero attention on equipment.
Very much agree to that!
Johnny, may I ask which lens you use?
It’s a fast prime (non-zoom) on a body that can shoot in the dark. I don’t use any flash at all, so that’s one less headache.
Johnny, multiple cameras and 7 lenses sounds like an overkill to me. I personally try to stay with just one body and 2 lenses, while Lola shoots with another body and two different lenses. If I need to use a different lens, I swap cameras/lenses with Lola and we are good to go :)
If I shot a wedding alone, I would probably just have the Nikon D700 + 50mm for portraits and 24mm for wide-angles.
I have nikon d-90 with the kit lens . I also have 70-200 2.8 vr lens , love this lens using it as my primary lens, I need to add new lens with a wide angle, for wedding and football games ( group pictures).. I want to take wedding and senior pictiures… What lens do you suggest?
Cindy, I apologize for a late response. For wide angles on a DX body, I find the Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR to be an ideal lens. It is very wide and has VR for low-light situations. I shot a wedding with a 16-35mm before and I was very happy with the results.
i’m newly in photoghraphy and decided to do wedding / function photoshot, i owe d300s and not surely what’s the best lenses shoud i take for the purpose. any idea?
what’s the suit lense for panorama shoot?
Adhanimj, doesn’t this article show the lenses I recommend? If you have more questions, read the comments as well.
Hi Nasim
Fantastic reviews and great questions/answers. I’m trying to grow my wedding photography and am considering some faster glass. I currently shoot with D700 and D7000 body. The lenses I currently use are Nikon 20mm 2.8 (normally on the D7000 which is 35mm equivalent), the older, but still super sharp Nikon 35-70mm 2.8, which is a great lens, and the older Nikon 80-200mm 2.8, which is also very sharp, but heavy to carry around. My initial idea was to use the 80-200 on the D7000 and have extra reach, but I’ve realised its not fast enough, without VR in limited light in churches etc. I prefer to avoid using flash or tripods although I’ve tried it on a monopod, but still not sharp enough, shooting at speeds of 125 without VR on a DX sensor.
So, I re-assessed and the last wedding I shot I used the 20mm on the D7000 and generally use the 35-70mm on the D700 which works great. I’m debating buying the Nikon 50mm 1.8 or 1.4 or a 85mm 1.8, but probably eventually both. My dilema is which to go for initally. I used to shoot the equivalents on Canon system and miss the fast glass and the bokeh they produce, not to mention the extra stops of light in darker settings.
I’m aware the 50mm will be a more do-it-all lens on the D700, but I was thinking the 85mm 1.8 on the D7000 could be a great focal length on the DX sensor for detail and would rule out needing the 80-200mm for most weddings. To be honest, I’m using the 80-200mm less and less as its so heavy, and it requires a lot of light, or a tripod to get the images razor sharp in low light churches. I’ve tried the 20mm 2.8 on the D700 and its very soft until f/5, in addition to a lot of distortion on the edges if shooting group shots close in, its so wide. I could sell it and go for a 24/28mm 2.8 prime to use on D700 and go for a 50mm 1.8 on the D7000.
I’d generally prefer less weight and thinking a couple of primes, or a few primes and the 35-70mm. Any advise would be appreciated.
Johny, I apologize for a late response. I would personally start out with a 50mm lens instead of an 85mm. Your best bet would probably be the cheap but good Nikon 50mm f/1.8G (see my Nikon 50mm f/1.8G Review), since I believe it is a better buy than the 50mm f/1.4G. My wife loves 50mm lenses and she would use them day and night without changing lenses.
You are right about the 80-200mm – lack of VR is a huge disadvantage when shooting in low light, especially at 200mm on a DX body. As for a wide-angle lens, most of them are going to have some levels of distortion. I personally like the 16-35mm f/4, but it has lots of distortion and vignetting, which you might not like for tight shots. If you need to have little distortion, the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G on the D700 would be ideal. But it is heavy and expensive… Another great lens is the 24mm prime, but it is even more expensive than the 24-70mm.
Ok…LOVE all the info in this thread!
I just a simple suggestion from you..
Shooting outdoor family portraits this weekend at a park, between 5 and 12 people.
I only own the 85mm 1.8 for my D700 right now…
I need to rent a wider lens, to fit the whole family in and not have to pull back so far.
What should I rent?
Thanks!
Sabrina
Sabrina, I apologize for a late response, I hope the photo session went well.
For group shots I personally favor the 24-70mm f/2.8G, although it is quite heavy.
Hi
i have one nikon D7000….my job is photographer.
tell me witch lense is good for me
Best lens for Nikon D-7000 for the full length.
thanks
amir
Amir, this article is full of suggestions, read it.
hi im doing wedding photography tomorrow,i use nikon d90 two body (both nikon d90),my lens is nikon 35mm 1.8,sigma 50mm 1.4,tokina 11-16,nikon 16-35mm f/4,nikon 55-200..the wedding inside the hotel,can u help me plz,which lens should i use?..thx very much for u help
Hameeth, I apologize for a late response. I would use the Sigma 50mm for portraits and Nikon 16-35mm for wide angles.
I am a new comer to wedding photography. I have done quite a few shoots with moddels and for parties. my camera was a cheapy and now i want to do it profesionaly, i love nikon camera’s, but don’t know wich one to invest in… what do you think? is the D5100 a good camera for this purpose?
I am in the same boat, I am interested in knowing this information as well.
Melissa, if this is going to be your first DSLR, then I would get the D5100 or D7000. If you have shot with a DSLR before, then try to get the D7000, since it is a much more serious camera with many more features when compared to the D5100.
I forgot to also ask about the flash and lenses… what should i get? please help?
Melissa, the above article has plenty of information on lenses. If you just want to start with 1-2 lenses, I would go for the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G and Nikon 16-35mm f/4G VR, one for portraits and one for wide angle shots. If budget is not an issue, then you might want to look into faster lenses shown in this article.
Forgot about flash. I would get the Nikon SB-700 – it is a great flash that will work perfectly with the D5100/D7000.
I am new to photography. I have a Nikon D3000 body. I originally purchased this camera to take pictures of my kids….I guess you could say I had a creative itch ;) Anyway, after about a year of shooting my kids, other family members and a few close friends upon request, I have been asked to shoot my cousin’s wedding. She is on a tight budget and asked me to do this for her. Her wedding is indoors, not the greatest light, and reception will be outdoors. I really want to do well shooting her wedding! After all, it’s not like we can re-shoot if I don’t… I have been doing hours of reading online and feel almost more confused about what lens I need for her wedding. I am on a $1,000 budget at max. Please help!
I forgot to mention, I do already own a flash (SB 600).
Majors, you did not specify what lens(es) you already own. I assume you only have the 18-55mm kit lens. If that’s the case, then I would buy the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G lens for portraits. Since you already own a wide-angle lens and have a flash, you only really need a portrait lens and the 50mm is very good at it, as shown in this article.
Hello,i recently bought a d90 with the 18-55 vr kit lens and a metz 50 af1 blitz.i bought them becouse i love photography but i”m serioussly thinking about doing some money with them in weddings and other events.
The 18-55 vr kit lens is such a bad lens for that?
I have done some test with them in some friends weddings.It looks great with(for) me thought this is the opinion of a man who used to make picture with a compact camera before:).
What do you think?
Bogdan, any image from a DSLR will look better than a point and shoot :) Since this is your first DSLR, you will surely appreciate its image quality, sharpness and colors. However, sorry to disappoint you, but it does not mean that your images are good enough for commercial photography. If you have done photography with a film camera before, it is a different story, but otherwise, don’t just think that you can buy a good lens and start to shoot weddings. It takes years of practice and skill to successfully shoot a wedding. If you are starting out, try finding other wedding photographers in your area that need assistants or second shooters. Shoot like that for a year or two and you will gain the confidence and the skill to do it yourself. And yes, if you are serious about shooting commercially, then you need to get rid of that 18-55mm and get higher-quality lenses :)
Hope this helps.
Thank you for your wise advice.I will do that..
Have a nice day.
Hi I’ve been asked to photograph my cousins wedding and I have the D90 with the 2 stock lens that came with the camera. 18-55 is one of them. I’ve read all of your recommendation and I want to purchase the 50mm f/1.4G Lens. Is this the best choice since it will only be me and I don’t want to be changing lenses throughout. The wedding will be at the beach and the reception that will be at a house but outside. Wedding starts at 3 until 11. Will I have any problems with this lens or is it pretty easy to learn. Please advise.
Thanks so much,
the other lens is the AF-S Nikkor 55-200mm 1.4 5.6G. Also what do you think of those new 1 NIKKOR
30-110mm f/3.8 – 5.6 VR Lenses?
Nassim,
I am seeking for a Good,Sharpest Nikkor Lens.Your article very much helped to choosing one.anyway my budget never allow me for the same.thank you nassim for sharing your knowledge,
murali
Great site! there is some great info here, many thanks
Hi Nasim,
Please help me out , I am planning to buy my 1st DSLR and i have shortlisted Nikon 3100D and Canon 1000 D both comes with 18-55 kit lenses. My questions-
1. Few people advised me to go for canon as lense upgradation later are more affordable in comparison to Nikon – Your views on this please.
2. Also, i checked and clicked some pictures with kit lenses and the image quality did not impress me at all, the lense does not have much zoom and I could not click pictures far away. Can you please suggest me a lense+ body combition within 750$. I want to take good potraits, landscape and wedding shots
Hi Preeti.
I’m not sure if you already picked up a camera and lenses. The Nikon 3100 is a good starter camera.
Try to pick up the 50mm 1.8D as its only about $100. And a 35mm 1.8. $210.
These two will get you much better image quality than the kit lens, better in low light and good for portraits.
I have a 2x D90 bodys and a 60mm 2.8, i use the 60mm for 99% of my portraits and I’m very happy with it.
I also have the kit lens 18-105 & 55-200 but i try to avoid using them all together.
I borrowed a 28-300 3.5 to try out at the last wedding i did and i didn’t like it at all. Very heavy, hard to keep steady. Results not sharp
So i am tossing up between a 70-200 or a 24-70…. i think
Any advice would be great.
I would be using the 60mm on one body and a zoom lens on the other.
Paige
Paige, get the 70-200mm – it will change your photography forever :)
I purchased the tokina 11-16 and a 150mm macro :)
Really happy with both but I still think I would greatly benefit from a 70-200 & maybe a 24-70 aswell.
It’s a little tricky managing only prime at a weddings!
I can see myself becoming an obsessive lens collector haha
Thanks
Paige
Hi Page.
The 70-200mm is a fantastic lens, but it is quite heavy. Great job on getting a wide lens, I noticed you were missing a good wide lens. And a long lens with macro is perfect for weddings so you can get long pics and good detail shots. Practice, practice, practice and I’m sure you’ll feel a lot more comfortable with using primes. I think you made good choices.
Once you start making some big bucks, you can justify spending over 3,000 on two lenses. Enjoy!
I am a beginner and just want to take great pics of my family. I have the nikon d3100 with the kit lens and the 55- 300mm. I have been getting great family/ kids photos and now friends are having me do their families too. I may want to upgrade camera and what lens is best to get for kids/families? Any suggestions camera and lens?
Thanks for offering your knowledge. I have enjoyed reading the comments.
Jennifer
Jennifer, I would just get a good prime lens like the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G for portraits.
Hi Nasim,
This is a fantastic article on the lens. I have a quick question – D7000 with 18-105mm lens. I do portraits (might have to get into weddings for the $) and I love close up of babies eyes that are pin sharp and great bokeh. My true LOVE is landscapes/nature. Which lens or combination would you recommend?
1. Nikon 35mm 1.8G (have read it is very sharp)
2. Nikon 50mm 1.4G (have read it is not as sharp wide open but great bokeh)
3. Nikon 50mm 1.8G (sharper than 1.4 not as good bokeh)
4. Or should I buy the 35mm 1.8G & 50mm 1.8G
The 85mm is a bit too expensive at the moment – or should I wait and save.
Thank you so much.
Regards,
Lizette
Lizette, I would start with the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G for portraits – it is better than the f/1.4G version.
Hi Nasim.
Very good website you have here! I just found out this website and have spend the last week reading every one of your article and reviews. Very informative and helpful. Thanks! :)
I have a few questions, I hope you could help me put.
I currently own a D700, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200 VRII, 50 1.4G, 105 VR and 28-300. I also have a couple of SB900s.
I shoot both wedding and landscape.
I’ve been thinking about replacing my 14-24 with 16-35 due the fact that the 14-24 can’t take filters, especialy grads (I don’t want to spend $500 on Lee’s SW150). Would it be a good idea? Or should I keep the 14-24?
And I’ve been looking for a prime specialized for portraits. I have my eyes on the 135 DC and 85 1.4G. Which one would you suggest me to get?
I also found that 24 1.4G seems to have such a good place in your bag. Is it that good? Do you think I should get it? (considering I already have 14-24 and 24-70, is the 24 1.4G so much better than the 24 in 14-24 or 24-70?)
And finally, I currently only have the budget for one lenses. Which one do you think should I get it first? (16-35, 85 1.4G, or the 24 1.4G).
Looking forward for your reply :)
Thank you and have a nice day.
Regards,
Jonathan
Jonathan, thank you for your feedback.
You might not be as happy with the 16-35mm performance after the 14-24mm, especially when it comes to distortion and vignetting. Having said that, it is also important to understand that anything wider than 24mm on full frame will in most cases cause severe vignetting with a lens filter holder attached. You would have to get a large filter holder and minimum 4×6 size filters and the 77mm ring needs to be very thin. If you are OK with some vignetting, then give it a try. One trick is to hold a filter by hand right in front of the lens, which works great. You cannot do that with the 14-24mm, because of the hood – light will enter from the sides and spoil your images. If you heavily rely on filters, then I would rent the 16-35mm for a day or two and see how you like it. I know that some of my readers sold their 14-24mm lenses and bought the 16-35mm and are very happy they did.
As for which lens to get, that’s a tough question. All three – 24mm, 85mm and 135mm DC are very good. I personally own the 24mm and 85mm lenses and I love them both. Considering your current line of superb lenses (except for the 28-300mm, but I know you got it for travel purposes), I think you need a solid portrait lens. The Nikon 85mm f/1.4G is, in my opinion, an ideal lens for that purpose – that’s what I would get if I were you. It has been tough to find, but I just checked B&H and they have in stock!
I will be posting this news on our Facebook fan page, so get it before others do – B&H always has a very limited stock of the 85mm f/1.4G.
Nasim, thanks for your reply!
It has given me enlightment.
I already have the Lee System with some Soft ND set. I will rent 16-35 like you suggested and see how do I like it :)
As for now, I will get the 85 1.4G. Fortunately it’s quite easy to get in my country :)
Hopefully I can also get the 24 1.4G in the coming months.
Happy holidays :D
Hi Nasim,
You have got a very informative site, well laid out, content rich and easy to search through. I lost count on how many got this link passed from me for reviews/tips etc.
I have been a hobbyist since 3 years+ and getting into the commercial line. Curious to know what would be the ideal way to go ahead with the lens collection and the back up body for weddings, portraits, events, products etc.
Present bag contents:
D700
D7000 (planning to add as back up)
Nikon 20mm 2.8D
Nikon 50mm 1.4D
Nikon 70-300 VRII
Nikon 105 2.8G (planning to add)
Nikon 70-200 2/8 VRII (planning to add but not available)
Nikon SB700 flash
Elinchrom FX200 kit
Hope to add D7000 and 105mm in a week’s time. Anything else I need to consider ? Adding on would be done in a gradual way as I go ahead.
Thanks and Regards.
Shaju
Shaju, I think you have a great list of lenses and cameras. I would not add more, unless you feel that you need it.
Nasim, thanks for the reply. First post to the reply things have turned around a bit :) As of now the bag has the following;
D700
D7000
Nikon 24-70 2.8G
Nikon 50mm 1.4G
Nikon 70-200 2.8G
Nikon 105 2.8G
Nikon SB700 flash
Elinchrom FX200 kit
I am happy with the current set up and do not wish to add anything more in the near future !
With the d700
Is the 50mm 1.4 and 85mm 1.4 nikon shoot full frame ????
Or I have to get new fx lenses
Yvon, both the 50mm f/1.4 and the 85mm f/1.4 are compatible with full-frame.
Hi Nasim!
Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Nikon lenses. Its my 1st time to own a DSLR camera and I have Nikon D7000. I love it so much but I am still not that familiar with it.
Reading your blog helped me a lot about Nikon lenses. Thanks! ☺
♥ Peach
http://peachyalvarez.blogspot.com
http://thingeofpeach.blogspot.com
You are most welcome! Happy holidays to you and your family!
Hi Nasim,
I am not a pro photographer but I am interested on shooting while traveling and some family events. I have a nikon D90 with it’s kit lens 18-105mm lens but I am planning to buy a 18- 200mm vrII. is it a good lens or any suggestions that you can give?
Leonardo, that’s a bad idea – you are essentially replacing a superzoom with another superzoom, which is not better in any way (except for giving you more range). I would suggest to get a prime lens like the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G instead.
What are your thoughts on the 85mm f/1.8 nikkor in lieu of the 85mm f/1.4 (considering I do not do this for a living, just for fun thus my funds are limited)? I’m sure it’s not nearly as good, but will it do as a lower-cost solution for a hobbyist?
Erin, it depends on what you are shooting with – the 85mm f/1.8D does not autofocus on entry-level DSLRs like Nikon D3100/D5100.
Nikon will be releasing a new 85mm f/1.8G within the next couple of months. If you are not in a rush, I would wait.
Hello Mr Nasim,
i usually shoot prime lenses only for photography (50mm 1.8 and 135 3.5 ai MF), but one of my friend want me to photograph his wedding (very small and mostly indoor).
i want to get an expensive zoom..do you have any thoughts on the Nikon 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 AF-S DX ?
i have a d200.
thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
Christophe
Christophe, you probably mean an “inexpensive zoom”. I would get the Nikon 16-85mm VR instead of the 18-70mm…
I have a D3100 Nikon. What lens would you recommend for engagement photos? I have a friend that has asked me to shoot some photos. I am not a professional photographer, just really enjoy taking photos. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Jessica, go for the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G – it is a great and cheap portrait lens for weddings.
Hello Nasim,
Firstly thanks for taking the time to repond to everyones questions. It is a daunting task spending oodles of cash, and its nice to have questions answered but someone knowlegable.
My question to you is, I have a Nikon D80, with a 18-200Vr.
Ive just purchased a D700, and am torn as to which lens to buy. Stuck on either the 27-70 or 70-200. My D80 has served for corporate photos, poeple portraits, and product photography.
I can only afford one of the above lenses. Which do you think would be best for now, for Studio photograhy of models (for catalogues, product photography eg from small bottles to motorcycles, and Portaits of people.
thanks..
TB, that’s a tough choice, because it looks like you need both. I would personally start off with the Nikon 24-70mm and get the 70-200mm later.
Thanks nasim.
Great post,I have been reading this post for over 2hours :)
learnt alot yay! recently upgraded from my d3100 to d7000 and considering the best lens for my d7000
i shoot fashion,events & considering weddings.
i have the regular kit lens 18-55mm,55-200mm & 18-105mm i need primes right?
Absolutely. I would start with the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G for portraits.
First off, I love your website – it steered me toward two lens purchases I might not have made before….the 24-120mm F4 and 50mm F1.8G lenses, and I have been happy with both. Before, I had a 50mm F1.8D lens, and it was garbage – soft and not contrasty at all, and had turned me off to that type of lens….til I bought the 1.8G. Love that lens! Anyway, I have found the 24-120mm F4 (and the 1.8G) to be pretty indispensable for weddings…..the only time I usually take the 24-70 out of the bag is for the formals, and shooting at F5.6 to F7.1. Besides the 24-120mm being really sharp, I like the lighter weight and VR over the 24-70 and the focal range. Occasionally I’ll need the 16-35mm or 70-200mm, but can do most everything with the 24-120mm. With any luck, the 24mm F1.4G and 85mm F1.4G lenses will be in the bag by springtime though….and then I will probably use the zooms less. Keep up the great work, your site is the only one I take seriously for lens/camera reviews.
Thanks,
Dana
Thank you so much for your feedback Dana!
Happy holidays to you and your family.
Hi, I am a VERY amateur photographer who has been asked to photograph a wedding next spring. Your information has been very helpful, but I wanted to get your opinion on the functional qualities of my lens for a wedding. It’s the Tamron version of Nikon’s 18-200 f/1.4. I bought it primarily for its versatility and its fair price, and I have shot a couple of rounds of engagement photos with it. I thought it did a fine job, but with nothing to compare it to but the standard Nikkor 18-55 lens, I don’t have a very solid basis of knowledge. While I’m not looking to invest a grand sum of money, as photography is not my profession, only a hobby called on by friends, I am interested in your input. Do you think it would be worth it to buy/rent a different lens to shoot a small outdoor wedding?
Thanks!
Rhonda, first of all, there is no 18-200mm f/1.4 lens :) The lens you mentioned, along with the kit lens you have are very slow variable aperture lenses (f/3.5-5.6). You definitely need a good portrait lens – I would get the cheap but very nice Nikon 50mm f/1.8G if I were you.
I have a D5000 with 18-55 kit lens. Got to do a wedding for a friend in the spring 2012. I just purchased the nikon 35 1.8 and thinking about getting the 50 1.4 will i be ok ?
Neal, you will be fine in terms of gear, just sharpen up your photography skills :)
Thank you Nasim for starting this thread.
After reading a long line of discussion, It’s really great information and you are really kind for answering everyone. Nice :)
I’m do portrait as a hobby, my setup
Fuji S5
Nikon 10.5 Fisheye
Nikon 17-55 2.8
Sigma 50-150 2.8
Sigma 30 1.4 (to make FOV and DOF match to FF 50 f2)
Lensbaby Composer
1 SB600
I’m not a kind of wedding photographer, but If I’m were, Do I need other lens for wedding ? and may be useful for portrait? My wish list is new AF-S 85 1.8G, Is it OK?
If you’ve time please see my site. Thanks
Aloha from Maui Nasim!
Your an amazing Wedding Photographer! Thanks for the inspiration and being so helpful! I have been following your blog for the last year. I have been shooting portraits and weddings for 2 years. Using equipment others would not ever want to use for paid shoots. (D60, 2 kit lens, & a 35mm) You have to start somewhere though. And I have learned alot along the way.
I am ready to upgrade now. For a Nikon body would you suggest:
D90 (save some $$ and spend it on more glass) or D7000?
Mahalo!!
Hi Jen.
I actually just wrote a long response on why the D7000 is much better than the D90, but I just reread your post and your needs. It seems like you have probably shot, and succesfully done so, weddings and portraits with a D60 for 2 years. So I would actually recommend you step up to the D90. You will get better ISO, you’ll be able to autofocus older nikon lenses and it will leave you some money to upgrade your current lenses. What kit lenses are you using? Your next upgrade should be to get rid of the kit lenses and get a nice zoom with 2.8 f. Best of luck and let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Tom
I definitely wanted to write down a quick comment to be able to express gratitude to you for all of the precious solutions you are giving on this site. My time-consuming internet investigation has at the end of the day been compensated with wonderful suggestions to go over with my guests. I would point out that we website visitors are unequivocally endowed to live in a really good network with very many special individuals with helpful advice. I feel extremely grateful to have seen the website page and look forward to so many more fabulous times reading here. Thanks once again for all the details.
Hello Nazim,
Yet another new subscriber to your terrific website. I’ve had a camera in my hands for some 45 years. My present equipment includes a D2X and a D700, a 17-55mm DX f2.8 and a 28-70mm FX f2.8. The system is extremely heavy for me, having picked up R.A in my hands, shoulder and feet. If I’m to continue covering the occasional wedding, I must seriously consider part exchanging 1 or both lens for lighter ones. The Nikon 85/50mm f1.4 G/D and the 24mm 1.4 look the likely candidates but having no experience with them, I need some advice before I go ahead. My studio work isnt a problem because I rest my camera systems on a side table or tripod. Would the 3 Nikon lens I’ve mentioned provide adequate coverage without too much hindrance, taking into account that I’ve always used ‘zooms’.
Kind regards. Fred
Hello Nazim,
First I would like to say Thank You for all the great tips. I have really enjoyed learnning and reading all the posts.
I am new to photography well to digital. I have taken a lot of pics of friends and family but all as a hobby but as more people see my pics I have had requests to take their portraits and I have a friend ask me to shoot their wedding which is a small wedding. I am nervous to do so but also excited to start on something new.
I have a Nikon D90 with a 18-105mm f/3.5 -5.6 I also have a Nikon Nikkor 50mm AF 1:1.8D which I really like for portraits.
My question is Would it be better to upgrade the body or to purchase more lenses? which do you recommend? I love doing portraits such as seniors, engagement, children etc but would love to do wedding in the future and my friends wedding is in may that asked me and I am hoping I am able to do it by then.
Would the D90 be an ok camera to shoot a wedding with? Wich lenses do you recommend?
I appreciate your recommendations.
thanks!
Great thread and greetings to Nasim and all who are contributing..
Hi Nasim,
I will be attending a family weeding. I have a Nikon D7000. I have two lenses, AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G and AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II . I am thinking of buying a flash too SB-700 AF Speedlight.
Let me know if this will be good to take great pictures or I should invest in some other lens too.
Thank you
Hi Nazim,
Thank you very much for this article. I am new to photography and only have a beginner SLR which is a Nikon D3000. However, I’ve been told that it’s the lens that makes the difference and how good you are as a photographer. I have a 50mm f1.4g prime lens which i use all the time for my portraits as I specialise on baby and children photography. However, a couple of women have contacted me now to do their weddings as they’re very impressed with my photos. I was thinking of hiring a 70-200mm f2.8 because I used that once on a football event and quite liked how clear the photos came out and me being able to stand a distance from the players. I thought this would be a great lens for a wedding. However, I am greatly intrigued with your suggestion to have a 24mm lens for a wedding too. Do you think I can get away with my D3000 with a 50mm and 70-200mm lens or would it be better for me to have a 70-200mm and 24mm lens? Also, do you think I should bother hiring out a better camera like D300 or D90 or stick with my trusty D3000 to save money too? Looking forward to your advice, thanks!
Hi. i lettel comfuse about the lenss and filters.
which is good for indoors lenss and family. 35 of 50???
which is good filters for more details (indoor and outdoor) for family pictures???
Thank you so much for all of this helpful information.
I currently have a Nikon D700.
I have a Nikon 50mm 1.8 lens, would you reccomend I upgrade to the 50mm 1.4 lens for shooting wedding photography? Or would you sugest purchasing another lens instead next?
Thank you!
-Amy
Amy,
If you read the review again you’ll notice that Nasim stated that the new 50mm f/1.8G lens is actually better than the 50/1.4. Other photographers I know also agree. I use the 50/1.8G lens on a D700 body as my main lens at most weddings and usually stay between f/2 and f/2.8, with results I can’t complain about. I also love my old AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 (pre-D generation) lens for its rich colors and gorgeous bokeh, but as I love to shoot against the light I avoid it in those situations because it flares very badly.
Thank you Bitan Photo!
Just curious what lens you would recommend I purchase next?
amy.
If that is the only lens you have and are on a budget maybe a 105mm would work for you when you cant be too close or a 70-200mm lens.
Will the 50mm lens fit on most Nikons? I am just starting out in the photography world and have a D3000. I am looking for a better lens to start doing portraits and weddings. I will probably be upgrading in cameras sometime in the near future too. Thank you!
I am travelling to Cambodia and i have my Nikon D700 which i have been using for last two years.
I use a Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR DX .
Is this the right lens for my camera or do i need to buy another lens?
I take portrait and scenic pictures depending on the location.
Whilst surfing the web i now believe that DX lens on this camera for a JEPG is just 5MP instead of 12MP which the camera offers, Is that correct???
Do please clear my mind ….
Thanks!
hi, i own a Nikon D5100, ive been told that the “AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G” is a good option for wedding photography. help… thanks
Shanawaz
Please specify on what you need help with.
That is a very good lens and with the crop sensor it will be about 52mm. The 1.8 will allow you great depth of field as well.
But, you must first look at your style of shooting. Wide, narrow, fixed or zoom style?
Also, what other lenses are you currently using for weddings?
Aside from sharpness and ability to shoot well in lower light settings, what will this lens offer you that your other lenses don’t?
Quality and budget should go hand in hand. If you can afford it and could use another lens in your kit this is a great lens. If you are looking for the next best all purpos lens to shoot half or an entire wedding you might want to look at the 24-70mm listed in the article or an equivalent.
Hi Tomas, am only stating now and i havent done any wedding yet am still doing birthday party and learning to move to the next level hopefully soon.
Am actually using the 18-55mm, i also have the 55-300mm which is more for landscape. Am looking at a lens for fixed style, the choices seem to be between Nikon 35mm f/1.8G or Nikon 50mm f/1.8G. i`ve look through the different reviews and find info which are both positive and negative for both lens
hi Shanawaz.
yes the 35mm and the 50mm are great lenses.
Both of these lenses are much sharper than the 18-55 or the 55-300, as well as faster.
But, you must ask yourself what kinds of pictures you mostly take. Do you prefer wider shots, do you find yourself in smaller rooms shooting a lot of people, or do you shoot more portrait style and possibly close up of things? The 50mm will give you greater depth of field and possibly better bokeh.
Both of these are fantastic. I don’t think you’d make a bad choice choosing either one. I have owned both, but have later replaced them with a 2.8 zoom as weddings are too fast moving. The 50mm is a great walkaround lens and also detail lens. The 35, if you are too close to the subject, does show some distortion.
Hope that helped.
Nasim,
Love this article on wedding lenses, as I am in the market to upgrade my glass this gave me many things to consider. I agree the 50mm 1.4G is an amazing lens, I never leave home without it. I had been using the older 24-120mm VR but now considering the newer f4 version, even on a DX camera I find the coverage fits my shooting style. Also looking to add 80-200 or 70-200 2.8 but money will be an issue after just upgrading to D7000. Even without VR I feel the 80-200 will suit me well, what are your experiences with this lens (AF-D not AF-S)?
Would you recommend the 24-120 f4 VR over the 16-85 VR as all around lens for weddings? I have heard a few complaints about the 16-85 being a bit soft, already seeing this with my current 24-120 that’s why it has to go.
Thanks.
Hi, Your wedding pictures are excellent!!! I am trying to get into the wedding business and0 i would lke to have your advice. I have a Nikon D5100 and I am planning to give it to my wife (back up). As I have a low budged I am planing to buy a D7000. (COMES WITH THE 18-105 DX LENS), lens I have also the Nikon 35 1.8 dx and the really basic nikon 18-55. What would you advice me?
Thanks
hi nelson.
The setup you are talking about is a good starting point. Practice, practice practice so you know what your lenses are capable of. I would highly recommend picking up a flash or two as these will be very important when there is less available light.
Hi Nasim
Love your site. Great information and help here. I’m in a bit of a quandry re my next lens purchase. I have the 24-120mm f4 VR and a handful of primes ( 24mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4G, 85mm f1.8, 180mm f2.8 ) I am pretty good for most portrait situations here but am due to do a couple of weddings in the spring.
While I’m happy enough swapping primes around for studio, family groups I’m not too keen on relying solely on them for weddings. I don’t fancy having to wait and pause while I change lenses frequently. I’m therefore looking to get a fast zoom. Obviously I will go for either the 70-200mm f2.8 or the 24-20 version.
Thing about the 70-200 is the shear weight!
I will be using one of each D700 and D300 bodies.
All in all I’m drawn towards using the 24-70 as my “main” lens, and and keeping it on the D700. I could then have the 180mm f2.8 on the D300 ( giving an equivalent 130mm -ish fast lens) with the 180mm in reserve for either camera if required.
Does this sound like a good idea or do you think I should go for the 70-200 as well ( I can just about afford it though the weight is a bummer! )
Thanks for your help
Thanks
Hi William.
The 70-200mm is heavy, but after a while you get used to it. it will save you from missing shots and those occasions where you physically can’t get close enough, fast enough. Also, make sure to get a strap that will hold both of your cameras on you so you can rest your arms in between takes.
Also, it depends mainly on your style. Do you like to get shots in the middle of the action or do you prefer shooting wider? The 28-70mm lens is cheaper than the 24-70 and just as good. That might free up some of your budget. Go with what feels natural to you, wider or more zoomed in. All the lenses mentioned above are excellent. You just have to find the right lenses for you, that work with your shooting style.
Hi Tom and thanks for your reply. Having considered again, I’m still gravitating towards the 24-70mm. Although I like the compression effect of the longer lens I’m guessing that I can probably get away with using my 85mm on the D300, to achieve this. Plus the f1.8 might come in handy! If need be I could swap over to my 180mm for really reaching out but the church in question is pretty small and so is the registry office where the other ceremony will take place, so therefore I wouldn’t have to swap too often.
I suspect that keeping the 24-70 constantly on the D700 would cover just about everything else.
I’m really guessing as I’ve only shot weddings as a second shooter and was given a specific brief so my inexperience in this area makes it difficult to know for sure.
Thanks again
You have the right idea and the 24-70 sounds like the perfect choice for you. The 24-70range is usually the most used focal range for weddings. Im sure you will love that lens.
Hi Nasim,
You have a great site, congrats. Im quite new to wedding photography, ive done only 2 small weddings so far and im learning as i go. I have a big wedding soon and would need some advise. I use a Nikon D7000 and just recently purchased a sb900 flash which im still get familiar with. Basically i have 2 questions:
1. I plan to use 3 lenses at the wedding but im not sure which ones.
a) definately need a prime lens (50mm 1.8G)
b) as a 2nd lens i need to chose 1 between these 3: 18-200vr or 55-200vr or 70-300vr (this one is quite heavy if you consider using it with the sb900)
c) Lastly as a nice to have (a friend offered to borrow me for the wedding) 12-24mm
I’ve never used a wide angle at a wedding, do you think i need it after chosing one of the above
+ the 50mm 1.8G?
2. The wedding will be late afternoon/evening and will be both indoor and outdoor. Do you recommend i take the sb900 with me and what mode is best for someone with no experience with flash?
Thanks in advance,
Nasser
Nasser. I can offer some help for now on your question.
50mm 1.8g great lens
2nd lens 55-200vr would work great, sb 900 is a must with that lens as it has a floating aperature and won’t do as well when the lights are low, or when you’re shootinga past 125mm. But, the sb900 is a great flash, just shoot on auto ( on the flash). Keep an eye on exposure levels.
Do not leave your house without the sb900! Also when shooting point the flash upwards up to 30 degrees towads your subject to eliminate as much shadow being cast.
If possibly visit the venue ahead of time and play around with the flash (bring a friend to practice with). Without any experience with flash you will likely over expose most of your shots. Practice, practice, practice. Also, remember to brings extra batteries for the flash as you will likely go through them quickly.
Best of luck. Any further questions I’d be happy to help as well.
Tom
hello Nasim,
Quick question! I have d3000 and want to get a prime lens that gives me “bokeh”, but cant deside wich one, 35mm1.8g or 50mm 1.8g. Since its a crop camera the 35mm will be my 50mm. And i want to pctures of my kids, not just portaits(heads and shoulders) but full body at home and outside and I feel that 50mm will be (75mm on my camera) to short of a distance between my kids and me not giving me enough space for full body pics. If i get 35mm, will i be disadvantage with the beautiful bokeh that 50mm gives and i also want sharpness and great contrast colors, but still be able to do some portait pics of my children too!
Thank you so much,
Lora
hi lora.
Now it looks like you need bokeh and full body portraits. Both of these lenses are very sharp. What lens do you have now? If you have the 18-55mm kit lens just set it to 35 and 50mm and see if you can fit full body portraits in them. The 50mm will give you better depth of field and seperate your subject from the background better. Also, get creative with portraits, like sitting down, at a distance, candids etc. Indoor full body portraits are hard to get. Unless you have a studio setup you wont find many of those. My recommendation is the 50mm, but im sure youd be happy with either lens.
Hello Tom, thankyou for your reply. I do have 18-55 and i took preatty good shots with it. I did set up a home studio to take pics of my kids, but there isnt enough space, so thats why i though i could fit with 35 mm better, but again all the fuss about 50mm makes me think twice, because i do want to achiev great bokeh.
You will not acheive good bokeh shooting in a studio indoors. You would need more seperation from the background and the subject. The bokeh would be more evident the closer you get to the subject or when the background is very far away. Unless you are shooting head shot portraits you will not get any bokeh in a small studio setup.
Also if you are shooting with a 18-55mm in your studio and there isn’t enough space then you will mostly likely need a wider lens than the 35mm. Nikon also makes a fantastic 20mm lens.
Basically the longer the lens the more prevalent the bokeh. But, you also need a sharp quality lens.
Your 18-55mm is very sharp at 6-14 f stop. Are you shooting in manual mode in your studio? The current lens you have should be perfect for your indoor shooting. For outdoors I would highly recommend the 50mm 1.8. You will not regret it, plus it has many uses; walk around, detail shots, portraits, some landscape etc.
Sorry for rambling.
yes, makes so much sense. i did shoot with50-200 that gave me beautiful bokeh, but some of the pictures werent as sharp. 18-50 works fine at home for portraits, but i wanted more light with f1.8 that primes have. I heard that 35mm is great for low ligh-indoors, for other pictureas as home events etc.. would 50mm do it as well, considering the tight space at home?
I greatly appreciate your responses! makes it much more cleare to me! Thanks alot!
The 35 an 50 are both 1.8 so they would basically allow the same amount of light in. What you definately need to get is a flash and learn how to use it well. It does take a lot of practice (never shoot the flash headon), but will give you wonderful exposure and allow you to shoot at f-stop 4-6 where your lenses are sharper.The sb-700 would be a great entry level flash to pick up. Instantly you will see better pictures from it. Learn to bounce off ceiling and walls.But, both the 35 and the 50mm will be much sharper than your lenses now.For various uses and situations the 50mm will be more flexible. Hope that helps.
i do own sb-600 and i bounce it off ceiling wit soft box oit and work with lights at times. So one last thing is, that you are saying i will get similar quality fotos when i shoot at home studio, with 18-55mm and flash=35mm+flash=50mm+flash. I wouldn see much difference when shooting the portraits at home with ligh and flash. So the 35mm and 50mm would give me best quality fotos when i shoot outside and esspecially 50mm would give be better bokeh, right? Thanks, that was my last question summon all of this together.
What I meant to say that if you are shooting in the home studio with the 18-55mm you should get nice pictures if you are within f stop 6-14. That is a pretty sharp lens in that range.
The 35m and 50mm are actually sharper so they would be an upgrade in your home studio although probably neither is wide enough for full body portraits. I’m assuming your home studio consists of strobes or studio lights. The 50mm would give you really nice bokeh for all other situations. For even better bokeh the 85mm 1.8D is amazing and not too expensive (under $500). So if bokeh is the key target as well as image quality pick up the 85mm 1.8 D or 1.4G. These are extremely sharp and have really nice bokeh.
Side note: I would recommend not using a soft box when shooting with your flash. Instead try a bounce card (and use the flash settings to lower and increase power). The soft box acts as a diffuser and spreads the light, but also requires more energy from the flash as the light is being diffused aka runs out your batteries much quicker.
I mostly shoot with primes . 15mm 3.5 AIs, 35mm 1.4G, 50mm 1.4G, 85mm 1.4G, 105mm 2.8 micro, 70 – 200mm 2.8 VRII.
saving money for 24mm 1.4G, 24 – 70mm 2.8G….
Good Morning! Loving this site but being almost brand new to wedding photography, I need some basic advice on my next purchase. I have a Nikon D90 that came with the 18-1085mm lens. I obviously need an upgrade. I have a couple of weddings coming up and I want to make my purchase as soon as possible. What ONE lens would you recommend I buy for these upcoming weddings. I don’t want to go all out because I still have so much to learn but I really need a better lens in the meantime. Please HELP!
Thank you,
Rebecca
sorry about the typo. i have the 18-105mm lens right now.
Rebecca, get the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G lens.
Thanks so much! I hope to buy it tonight!
Oops I might have messed up my post. I was trying to than Tom for his help but it seems to have attached itself to the bottom of his post where he won’t see it. Anwyay Tom my response is just below your reply to me.
Thanks again
wish to learn together from you… i’m really a noob … your explanation is awesome…everything is in details.
Hi Nasim, I have always liked photography but if I knew the resources for a beginner like me available on Internet and guys like you to help and guide, would have taken it a lot serious earlier on, but never too late right? I had nikon d40x body, bought 50mm 1.4 d yesterday but going to exchange it for 50 mm 1.4 g after reading this post, I think extra $200 are worth spending, due to prices difference I also considered 50 mm 1.8 g, but I think I have allready fallen in love with 1.4:), unless you advice otherwise, you have 12 hours and your time starts now, JK
Malik.
It looks like the 1.4g is within your budget and you like it. Go for it and enjoy the nice lens.
Thanx Tomas, allready did and loving it, maybe because I did not even try 1.8, but no regrets, I believe if something is pricier than the other, must be for a reason..
Well guess what? I bought the 70-200!! I decided I had already got the 50mm f1.4. 85mm f1.8 and the ( cheapo but adequate ) 24mm f2.8 as well as the 16-35. All in all I decided that the 24 and 50mm options I already had covered the range of the 24-70 mm adequately.
I will probably have the 70-200 on my D700 and swap it with the 50mm or 24mm as required. I will also use the D300 with the 85mm attached. I might change this strategy of course once I’ve experienced a few times.
Thanks for the advice
Congrats! That is a phenomenal lens. Yet you might want the 50mm or 24mm on the second camera body so you’re not covering the same focal length. Enjoy and please share some feeback on it.
Love your advice in regards to Nikon Lenses for weddings.
I started out using crop-sensor (D90) and now have moved to full-frame (D700). It was definitely the best decision i made.
I almost bought the 24-70 2.8 AF-S like you recommended, but due to a deal that i could not pass up, i got the 28-70 2.8 AF-S instead. What is your opinion on this? I know it is an older lens and heavier, but i don’t mind the weight issue at all. It balances well when I wear the Cotton Carrier system.
I do have the Nikon 24 2.8. I too use the 50mm 1.4G on a regular basis.
Thanks for the advice.
Albert.
Since you are using full frame that is an exceptional lens for it. Budget often dictates what we purchase, but both the 28 and the 24 zooms are top of the line. Great choice.
Always purchase what is going to work for you and what you’ll find comfortable. On most pro series lenses “better or best” is determined by what your needs are.
I have a question for you!! If you had to shoot the entire wedding on your d700 with just 2 lenses what would it be0? I know you favor the 50mm 1.4g and the 85mm 1.4d/g,but would you shoot the entire wedding with just those 2 lenses?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks again for all the help. I have ordered a Nikon 50mm 1.4g lens through BH. It’s backordered so I’m not sure when I will get it but I’m excited! What is your suggestion for my next lens? I know I need a good zoom but I’m not sure which one to get. It will be a WHILE before I get it, but I’d like to know what to be looking for…
Hi Nasim, I’m very new on this site. I have read almost all of the comments. I really love your site. It has got lot of information. I’m planning to have Nikon D800 when its coming out. By the way i’m not a professional photographer but love to take pictures of anything. I have got the following gears:
Nikon D200
Nikon D300
Nikon SB 800
Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR1
Nikon 50mm f/1.4G
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G
Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR
Nikon 105mm micro f/2.8 VR
Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 VR
Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8
You can see 4 of them are DX lenses. Though i don’t have any intention to dump my DX bodies but want more selection of FX lenses so i can use on both. Do you want me to replace the 17-55 2.8 or any other? If it is then which lens you want me to get? I am dying to get Nikon 85mm f/1.4d for tight head shots and creamy bokha instead of 50mm 1.4G. Do i really need to replace or add any lenses? After considering all my setup please advice me if i need to add/replace any lenses. Thank you.
Hi, thanks heaps for your post. I’ve done a bit of back up photography for weddings and am going to be the main photographer for a couple of weddings this year.
I shoot on DX and I’m wondering if you’d still recommend the Nikon 50mm 1.8g (for DX), especially as I already have the sigma 30mm 1.4.
I also have the sigma 18-50 2.8, and the Nikon 80-200 2.8.
Thanks! Matt
Hi! Thank you for your website and advice! It has motivated me to get back to shooting. I am planning to upgrade my equipment. I currently own the D70, sb8oo, 50mm 1.4, 35mm 1.8, 18-55mm non vr. I will be shooting events, parties, portraits, maybe eventually weddings. I love people and shoot mostly with a photojournalistic style. I currently only have a budget for a new lense or body. I was thinking of investing in the 24-70mm 2.8 first then upgrading to a D700, and use my D70 as backup. Do you think this is the right choice using the D70 with 24-70mm until I can upgrade to the FX body? Any other advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks so much! Linda
Hi Linda.
I’m not sure what your budget is, but you could probably pick up the less expensive D7000 and the 24-70mm 2.8. I use it for weddings and events and works great.
If not, then your idea of the 24-70mm 2.8 and then the D700 is a great idea. If you buy the D700 first your 18-55 and 35mm 1.8 would not be good on it as they are DX lenses.
good luck!
Great reviews on the site. My wife has been doing a lot of photograph work over the past 3 years and it is time for me to get her a full frame camera. I am ordering her the D800. Would you still recommend the 50mm/1.4G over the 50mm/1.8G? I know your review was really great on the 1.8G. She shots with a Canon 7D now and I know she wants to move to Nikon, so I am going to surprise her. She does mostly portraits (family, kids, pregnancy), but also shoots weddings too. Other than the 50mm, what would be the one other lens you would recommend me get for her? Thanks again and great site!
Hello Nasim,
I am looking at taking newborn children portraits etc.
Was looking at getting a few lenses….
nikkor af-s 85 1.8g (that just came out) what are your thoughts?
and also
nikkor 50f1.4g af.s or the 50f1.8g
Thanks kindly!!!
Hi Ashley maybe I can help.
I’m assuming you have some lenses right now.
My recommendations would be to pick up the 50mm 1.8G and the 105mm 2.8G Micro.
Remember these are very small subjects. The 50mm will allow you full body shots, fast and sharp glass. You will be able to use that in all sorts of portraits.
The 105mm 2.8G Micro is fantastic and you’ll be able to get the small details like fingers, toes etc. And you can also use that lens for great headshot portraits as well.
Hope that helped.
T
Hi Nisam,
Is it true that the Nikon 50mm 1.8G perform better than the 50mm 1.4G in many ways? In Malaysia here, the 1.4G sell for about RM 1900, whereas the 1.8 G only sell for about RM 750. So much of price difference and yet the 1.8G can perform better than 1.4G in many ways? I am going to have a heartbreak, because I just bought a 2nd hand mint condition 1.4G and it cost me around RM 1200.
hello
thinking of trying to use my nikon lenses on a new olympus micro four-thirds mount. do u have any thoughts on this. my nikon body is old and i love how lightweight the Olympus Pen body feels…
hoping it will offset the weight issue.
thx emma
I pre ordered the Nikon D800, Will my existing Nikon 85mm f/1.4D lens work good for this new Camera? And What will be the best zoom lens that you will recommend for wildlife photography?
Thanks in Advance
85mm will work for sure.
as for wildlife, ,it depends if it is for personal use or if you want to sell prints
so you could get a Nikon 80-400 or a Nikon 300mm f/4 (prime lens) as you don’t want to find yourself face to face with a bear or a moose
Thanks a lot for the advise, this place is sgreat.
Hi,
I use the Sigma 50-500 f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM for wildlife photography and couldnt be any happier. On my D7000 I get an effective focal range of 75-750mm since this is a full frame compatible lens. If weight is not an issue then this would be a very good cost effective choice.
Regards, Usman
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usmanhayat
Hi Nasim!
I actually just traded for, and got, the 85mm 1.4D and it is fantastic! Color rendition is amazing, it is extremely sharp, fast lens. I also highly recommend this lens. I traded my long zoom lens and although I will miss the zoom, this lens is sharper and captures vivid colors much better. Also having the 1.4 will really help me in lower light situations.
Thanks.
Absolutely love the 24-70mm lens.
Works beautiful for all kinds of photography!!
Hi Nasim. I have a question about weddings that is slightly off the lens topic but I wonder if you could answer it anyway. The lenses you prefer for weddings have fairly wide aperatures and your bodies handle low light well. How much use of your flash do you use in a wedding ceremony and afterwards (ignoring the formals)?
hi nasim
i have a nikon d5000, 18-55mm kit lens (VR), 55-300mm nikor lens (VR) and 18-255mm sigma lens and sb700 speedlight.
i am interested in wedding photography. which lens should i use in case i do not want to buy a prime lens.
thanks in advance
a D5000 is a Dx camera..so, i would get a 17-55 f/2.8 (nikon) or the 17-50 (by tamron for less than $700).
also since a DX, i would get a Nikon 35mm f/1.8 for low light situation (less than $200)
or you can also get a 50mm f/1.8 which great for low light on a Dx (with the 1.5 crop…it is like a tele lens)
sell you Sigma 18-255mm…too slow for wedding, and buy a back-up camera instead (like a Nikon d70)
hi christophe
thanks for the reply. however, at the moment i am in no position to buy new lens. the wedding is round the corner. ok sigma is out of contention. but what about the other two lenses? can these be used for the wedding. of course, there will be a professional photographer to cover the wedding. i am covering the wedding for my experience and knowledge only.
if you are not the main photographer, then you are fine…
However, if you have $200 to spare…i would be a 35mm f/1.8d for DX..you will see a HUGE difference in low light compare to the 18-55 kit lens..and i assure you that you will only want to use the 35mm f/1.8 instead of your kit lens.
i had a kit lens once…
forgive my ignorance, but i am presuming that the lens that you have recommended ie 35mm f/1.8d for dx is of nikon.
YEs…the 35mm f/1.8 G for dx ..it is less than $200
hi christophe.
finally purchased the 35mm f/1.8g for dx yesterday. most of the trial shots came out very well. i hope it serves me well in the long run. hope to cover the wedding soon with it.
thanks for the advice
Hey Nasim, loved your articles and it helped me a lot and but i was wondering weather third party lenses are worth buying like Tamron SP 60mm f/2 DI II LD Macro Nikon-f or not .I ,mean people say third party doent have any resale value and i know Nikon have great lenses but just is it worth or not ???
Great article! I want to get your opinion on the 85 1.4d and 50 1.4g if I just use these lens for the whole wedding, Would it be enough? The wedding is outdoors just so you know, thanks!
hello Spencer…i have using primes lenses for 5 weddings (all outdoor in Florida).
but with 2 cameras.
one with a 50mm on it
and the other with a 85mm.
it’s a little more work (understand as zooming with feet!!)..but i don’t mind at all since i know what i am doing.
overtime, a outdoor wedding is always the same!!
Hey there! I have been reading your articles all day and love them! You have so much insight on everything cameras so I wanted to ask what you think would be best for me. I am about to buy the Nikon D700 body and I want to buy 2 lens to go with it to start me off for Wedding Photography. I have shot a lot of photos over the past 4 years and I’m ready to make and investment in this career. So if you were in my position, with all your knowledge, what would be the 2 first lens you would buy to jump start a career in photography? I want to shoot weddings but I also love landscape and nature photography as well! Please if you could help me out that would be amazing! Thanks so much!
Hello Jessica…i have be reading those posts (over a period of time)…
so if you need 2 lenses :
Nikon 24-70 f/2.8
Nikon 70-200 f/2.8
with only those 2, you cover the whole focal range!
if you need 3 lenses…i will had a 50mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 ($120) for the low light situation.
and don’t forget a back-up camera!!! (even a Nikon d70 will do)
Hello,
I am new to photography and currently learning it with Nikon D5100. I use to take pictures around with its 18-55 mm lens. Now I am thinking to practice in a wedding environment. so as a first step, is Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S suitable for me as its a affordable lens? Would it work fine with Nikon D5100?
Thanks
Hi Faizan.
I would recommend the 35mm 1.8G or the 50mm 1.8G. Practice a lot with your depth of field.
It depends if your tendency is to shoot wider or closer to 55mm on your kit lens.
In any case you will find your images and tecnique will get sharper as you will have to think a little more about composition as it is a fixed lens. The 35mm is a little cheaper than the 50mm.
Let us know what you pick up.
Thanks Tomas. I would like to shoot in a Indian Cultural Weddings where you will have so many sharp colors around you. my budget is $500. I can buy 50mm 1.8G or 33mm after your recommendation. Also if I will go for 33mm lens in $199 , I can also able to buy a telephoto zoom lens. But if 50mm lens is far better than 33mm and telephoto lens image quality, definitely I will buy 55mm 1.8G.
What is your recommendation? I know it was a confusing question :)
Thanks
35 f/1.8G and 50 f/1.8G will have same image quality.
however, if you are going to shoot an Indian Wedding, you WILL need a wide angle lens, as family members love to have photos taken with the bride and groom..and if you just use a 50mm for that on a DX body, i will have to physically back-up a lot to put all the people in the same photo!!!
i did a few Birthday parties and a Wedding for Indian people, and i was glad that i had my 24mm with me (even with that one, i had to back up too).
SO, in conclusion, get the 35mm f/1.8G for general photos and get an used 17-55mm for your group shot (if the 17-55 is too pricey, get a used 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5)
Thank you christophe for such a wonderful information. I can raise my budget to $800 for better photos. Also, I want to ask that what do you mean by general photos? I mean like, you may see that usually there’s a photo session for bride & groom in a separate room with umbrella lights. Is 35 mm lens is also good for these type of sessions?
what i meant by general photos was any photo that is NOT a group photo.
since i am not Indian, i cannot recall all the terms…but for the “painting” of the Bride, i used a 50mm and a 85mm…for the dancing is used a 50mm f/1.8D and a wide angle (i did have 2 bodies….both DX)
for the Bride and Groom ONLY : a 35mm will be fine…i used a 50mm with two 60″ umbrella (both with speedlight set to manual)
Hi Christophe, once again I want to ask you something :) hope you’ll not mind. One of my friend’s friend is selling used 18-200 lens for just $600 (take a look here)
http://en.nikon.ca/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/2192/AF-S-DX-NIKKOR-18-200mm-f%252F3.5-5.6G-ED-VR-II.html
Is it also a good lens specially for wedding photography? I mean more than 35mm?
Thanks
Hello Faizan…everyone has his own style of shooting.
for my part, i will never used a 18-200 (way to slow).
if i was going to buy a used zoom, i will be a 80-200 f/2.8 (which sells for about $600 or less)
i will use it on one body and use either the 35mm f/1.8g or 24mm f/2.8d on another body.
Actually, i like to use one body as it takes me only a few seconds to switch lenses.
Some people will tell you that you need a 24-70 and a 70-200 to shoot a wedding….but at the end, you have to look at your own style…and nobody can decide for you!!!.
myself, i mostly use a 50mm and a 85mm to shoot weddings….and i never had any problems!!!
it is JUST MY STYLE OF SHOOTING!!!…you need to find your style, and don’t listen to other people.
Hi Faizan.
My recommendation would be to buy the 35mm 1.8G and to buy a flash. Pick up the SB700.
If it gets dark you might need the extra light to get some good shots. That will take practice, but a flash is always good to have.
Thanks Tomas for useful information. So a 35mm lens would be enough for a whole ceremony? or should I also use 18-55mm (already have).
Faizan. Are you shooting this wedding for fun or are you getting paid? You can shoot a whole wedding with the 35mm as well as shoot a whole wedding with the 50mm. It really depends on your style and what viewing angle you are used to.
If you think the 35mm is not wide enough Nikon makes an excellent 20mm 2.8D for around the same price as the 50mm 1.G.
Practice, practice, practice and you will find you can do most photography with one or two lenses. Hope that helps.
I just re-read your post and you said you are “practicing”. Go with the 35mm 1.8 lens. You will love it.
yes exactly…m not a pro and yet practicing. Actually I saw photographers in these type of ceremonies with big lenses and that 35 mm is a small lens thats why I thought that I am missing something.
Your info would be a first step for me towards professionalism. Once again, thank you so much. I will buy that lens soon. :)
Great approach Faizan.
I went through almost 7 lenses before I found the kinds that worked best for me.
So always make the lenses adjust to your style and don’t adjust to the lenses if that makes sense. Figure out your style and what works best for your needs. Every pro will tell you about a different lens, but you have to find what works best for you. Create a flickr account and post some of your pics on there. I’d be interested to see some pics of these weddings as I’ve never been to or seen an indian wedding.
And most of all practice, practice, practice. That is the most fun thing about photography. You always have an opportunity to practice.
Yes I will definitely show you those wedding pictures. May I see your photography on flickr if you have an account?
sure it is http://www.flickr.com/photos/imagesbytommyg
Hi Tomas, once again I want to ask you something :) hope you’ll not mind. One of my friend’s friend is selling used 18-200 lens for just $600 (take a look here)
http://en.nikon.ca/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/2192/AF-S-DX-NIKKOR-18-200mm-f%252F3.5-5.6G-ED-VR-II.html
Is it also a good lens specially for wedding photography? I mean more than 35mm?
Thanks
No that is not a specialty lens but an all purpose walk around lens. it is good for general photography when you need something versatile and light weight. for weddings you need specialty lenses, fixed apertures and sharp glass. for weddings I would suggest passing on that lens. learn what you have so far and master those lenses. a specia
HI Nasim,
I was reading through the blog , some beatifull arguments and ofcoarse you have very wonderful pictures.I mostly shoot Indians wedding in CA and have nikons D700,24-70,50 1.4 , 85mm 1.8 ,105 D 2.8 , legendry 80-200 and 2 xSB800. Just sold my D300 and saving D800. D3 and4 are very heavy to carry around for 8 hours. YOu think 16-35 is better or just 20 mm 2.8 prime to shoot group. The zoom would be more flexible and 20mm would be sharper. But then wide angle are not used that much.Thanks
Hi Nasim,
Thank you for sharing your knowledge with the world. I am a full time wedding photographer and have recently started DSLR videography. I have a D700 and 24-70 2.8 lens and a sigma 70-200 hsm and a 50mm nikon . I am planning to buy some more lenses for my work. Could you advice which are the other lenses i should have and which lense i already have that i should change. Also i need a lens for the macro shots .
If i buy another body which should it be. I am not much worried about budget because i will be buying one by one but need the best glass. Pls advice.
Sudhir
Hi Sudhir.
Looks like you are a full time wedding photographer.
There are no more lenses you “should” have. It seems like you have everything covered.
Suggestions:
For a macro lens I would recommend the 105mm 2.8G VR. It is a fantastic macro lens.
Also, if you like, upgrade your sigma 70-200mm to the nikon 70-200mm vr 1 or 2, they will autofocus a little faster and are a tad sharper too.
If you don’t have a backup camera you should get one. I’d suggest getting another D700 so you have two cameras that use the same controls and that you know.
Hope that helps.
Hi Nasim
Thank you so much for your reply. I will definitely add the 105 2.8 into my kitty. Also i am planning to get a D800 for the second body. This is what i expect to own in the near future
1. Nikon D800 body
2. Nikon D 700 second body
3.Nikon 24mm 1.4
4. Nikon 70-200 vr2
5.Nikon 105 2.8 vr
Pls let me know if i am missing on something.
Hi Nasim,
I’m not a pro but I love to capture weddings, landscapes and architectures whenever I can. I have a D7000 and use the 18-105 kit lens with it. For landscapes I use a Tokina 11-16 F/2.8 and also have the 50mm 1.8, 35mm 1.8, 85mm 3.5 and a Sigma 50-500 mostly for wildlife. With the launching of the D800 I am planning on making a switch. I know that most of my lenses are crop format, which I will be replacing. Ok now my question is which everyday lens should I buy. I am considering between the 24-70 f/2.8 and the 24-120 f/4. I understand that the f/4 on the 24-120 will not be a great disadvantage as the D800 performs pretty well up till ISO 6400.
Keep up the awesome work~!~
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usmanhayat
Regards, Usman
Hi, It is so hard to find nikon wedding information. Everyone seems to shoot Canon, but to me all the Canon images look the same (duh). Nikon looks so different to me, and everyone says I’m crazy, you can’t tell the difference and so on. I can see a difference. I don’t own anything, used to have a 50D, and now only have a point and shoot (canon). But I’m in the market, and you have pushed me back towards Nikon again.
Hi Naism
Thank you so much for sharing your photography knowledge with us.
I just want to check out a small thing with you. I will do a photo shoot of my brother’s wedding in few weeks and currently I own a Nikon 50mm 1.8g and Nikon 18-105mm 3.5-5.6G with my Nikon D7000 body. Do you think I can do some experiment with that or I definitely need to buy 50mm 1.4g you mentioned? Please suggest!
(There will be other professional photographers doing their job, but I certainly do not want to miss the opportunity to try and hoan my skills!)
I’ve used both the 50mm 1.4 and the 50mm 1.8 for portraits and first of all you should realize that on your D7000 both these 50′s are going to give you 75mm since they are fx lenses. 50 1.8 is a great lens in my opinion but you might want to look at something with a smaller focal length than the 75 you will get on the D7000 by using either of the two 50′s. I also use a dx format 35mm 1.8 with is around 200 dollars and I found it very useful for weddings. If you intend to shoot with a speed light then the 18-105 can do the job for you but if you do not plan on using a speed light, then you might want to consider something with a wider aperture and both the 50mm 1.8 or the 35mm 1.8 will do a good job for you.
Regards,
Usman Hayat
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usmanhayat
Hello Nasim,
Thank you for your useful information on photography. I am a walk around photographer in Pakistan and now recently moved to Canada. I sold out my Nikon D5100 Camera in Pakistan now I am planning to buy Nikon D7000 with 17-55mm lens. Actually I am not a professional photographer but wants to be a wedding photographer with these tools. Both D7000 and 17-55 lens are under my budget and I need your suggestion either both tools are a good combination or not for a learner?
Also, can you please gimme useful links where I can learn Wedding Photography according to Canadian culture?
P.S. I will buy other necessary stuff of photography in future e.g: Tripod, Speedlite flash and 60″ Umbrella’s.
I have a d-90, want to upgrade to d-700 or d7000 not sure which one would be a better choice? I have the kit lens and the 70-200 2.8 lens. I take senior and family pictures and sport pictures, I have my first wedding in May. I may buying a new lens. Which one would you recommend? Thank you
Hy Amy.
A few things to consider here. I upgraded from the D90 to the D7000 and it is a big improvement. For me it was a better investment to go to the D7000 because it is nearly have the price of the D700 and I didn’t know how many weddings I would book so the $2,000 plus investment was not right for me at the time.
Also, with the savings you could pick up one or two good lenses.
You say this is your first wedding. Have you done a wedding as a second shooter yet?
Weddings are very difficult. Keep the D90 as a second camera body and maybe keep one lens on it so you can switch from one lens to another quickly.
Also, I’d recommend the 35mm 1.8G or the 50mm 1.8G as starting lenses. And you will need a wide angle as well. So the 24-70mm 2.8 is great or the 20mm 2.8 Prime lens could be a good start.
Remember if you opt for the D700 your kit lens won’t work well on it, so you will need to purchase a FX lens. Those are very expensive.
If you have any further questions please let me know and I’d be happy to help.
:)
I appreciate if anybody would like to answer my query as I think, Sir Nasim is busy.
Hello Nasim,
Thank you for your useful information on photography. I am a walk around photographer in Pakistan and now recently moved to Canada. I sold out my Nikon D5100 Camera in Pakistan now I am planning to buy Nikon D7000 with 17-55mm lens. Actually I am not a professional photographer but wants to be a wedding photographer with these tools. Both D7000 and 17-55 lens are under my budget and I need your suggestion either both tools are a good combination or not for a learner?
Also, can you please gimme useful links where I can learn Wedding Photography according to Canadian culture?
P.S. I will buy other necessary stuff of photography in future e.g: Tripod, Speedlite flash and 60″ Umbrella’s.
Hey,
Faiza I once had, and thoroughly loved the D7000. I also once kept the D5100 and by the way the 5100 and the 7000 share the same Expeed 2 processor. The 7000 has some advanced functions however. Unlike the 5100, the 7000 kit lens is the Nikkor 18-105. The thing is that if you don’t intend on buying additional lenses at the moment, then I would strongly advise the 18-105 instead of the 18-55 as it would give you that much preferred extra reach. A couple of portrait lenses which I have personally used with the 7000 are the 35mm f/1.8 (roughly pkr 20,000) and the 50mm f/1.8 which is a full frame lens so it would give a focal length of 75mm on the crop format 7000 and costs just a little over pkr 10,000. Both these lenses are on the lower end of the Nikkor pricing chart and yet I absolutely love both of them. So basically what I would suggest for you is the 18-105 if you do not plan on adding further lens anytime soon, or you can go with the 18-55 and get yourself a nice portrait lens. Also please understand that a speed light is quite essential for wedding photography, I use the SB700 which I find totally sufficient for my non professional needs. Also if you still are in Pakistan, then perhaps I can send you some essential photography tips, tutorials, ebooks and videos that I have collected over the past year. it consists of more than 15gb so mailing it unfortunately wouldn’t be an option and covers wide areas from weddings, landscapes, lighting, portraits etc etc.
Good luck and let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Usman Hayat
uhayat(at)hotmail(d0t)com 0322-6654882
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usmanhayat
Thanks Thomas for the quick response. I have never done a wedding before , this is a family wedding .They would not take no for a answer. ( You get what you pay for LOL !!) Not sure if i will ever do another wedding. I only want to buy one lens right now either the 24-70 or the 50mm 1.8G ..Which one do you recommend? Right now i use 70-200 2.8 all the time.
Hi Amy.
It sounds like you do a lot of portraits and family shots. The 24-70 is almost 5 times the cost of the 50mm 1.8G.
My recommendation to you would be to pick up the 50mm and the 35mm 1.8G. That is roughly about $450 total. You will get sharp glass for weddings and for portraits later on.
On a future list you might look at the 85mm 1.4D or 85mm 1.8G, for portraits they are a very flattering view angle, super sharp, great bokeh as well.
Good luck!
Hi Amy.
One last thought.
If you prefer zooms, you might want to look at Tamron’s 18-55 or 28-75 2.8 lenses. Not as tack sharp as Nikon’s, but great quality overall and they go for around $500. Only if you prefer zooming.
For portraits, hands down go with Prime lenses.
Any suggestion on wide angle lens. I have 70 200 2.8, need a good lens to go with it .
Thanks Tomas, I thinki I will buy the 50 mm 1.8 and the 24 -70 for a wide angle lens..
Sounds great Amy! Who knows you might love shooting weddings.
I have a Nikon D3000 camera what lense can i purchase for that type of camera, any advice…thanks
I have a Nikon D3000 camera what lense can i purchase for that type of camera…thanks
Hi, Can somebody tell me that if we can use 24-70mm lens with Nikon D7000 DSLR? Comparing to 17-55mm lens, which one is good to use with D7000 for wide angle?
Hi Faiza.
Yes of course you can use any lens on a DX body.
It is only when you are trying to use a DX lens on an FX (Full Frame) body that there is vignetting (dark corners).
So if you are looking for wider angles you should probably use the 17-55 2.8.
Tom
You need to understand that the 24-70 f/2.8 is a full frame lens and on your DX D7000, only the center area of the lens will be used and you will “NOT” get 24-70 focal length. You would get 36-105mm with this lens when used on a D7000. And that in my opinion is not a very viable wide option.
Also I dont understand why you are hell bent on getting a $1500 17-55 while it is not a nano crystal coat lens and doen not even have VR, which I would strongly advise as you are a novice. You should get the 18-200 and save yourself all that extra money and get a wide and portrait prime. If you use any FX lens on a DX body then multiply the focal length by 1.5.
DX lens on a DX body, the focal length remains the same as is the case of the 17-55.
DX lens on a FX body is like putting diesel in a Ferrari because the cameras megapixels will be cut by more than half.
And yes, Tom has correctly stated that out of these two, the 17-55 is a much better wide option on a D7000. And also when using a DX lens on a FX body you will get that vignetting Tom is reffering to unless your FX cam is set to DX Crop mode and in that case, the megapixels will be cut by more than 50 percent but there will be no vignetting.
Usman
Hi there, I’ve been professionally shooting babies/children/families/births etc with a nikon D40 for the last 5 years. I recently purchased the nikon d5100. I was recently hired to do my first wedding in November. I noticed earlier on that you told someone their camera was not adequate for weddings. Is this so with a d5100? I have a 35mm lens, the kit lens, and a 70-300mm lens.
I still have time to return the 5100, but I love how light and compact it is. I am willing however to upgrade slightly if its not adequate for weddings, as I’ve already been hired for one, and have many more inquiries.
Thanks so much for any and all advice!
Kati
hi Kati…..i did a wedding 2 weeks ago in Georgia. it was a traditional indian wedding over the course of 2 days..anyways, i was shooting with my d200 (two of them)..one with a 35mm f/1.8g and the other one with a 85mm f/1.8d.
the other photographer (for the groom) was using a canon d60 and a nikon d3100!!. all photos from both of us came out great….if you feel comfortable with your d5100, and if it is a wedding where you charge $3000 to do it, then i don’t see why not!….also forget about the kit lens! it is too slow for indoors photos…sell it, and get a 20mm f/2.8d (even used) for indoor group shot.
i do my outdoor group shots with my 35mm…and my indoor with my 20mm (which i did not even use on this specific wedding as the room was large enough to do group shot with the 35). Also i remplace my “long” zoom with the 85mm f/.18d and never looked back!!!!
i hope that it helps you….
correction ” please read: ‘WHERE YOU DON’T CHARGE $3000″
SORRY
Good morning Kati.
When you say you are a professional does that mean you get paid for these sessions or that it is your primary source of income?
I have limited experience shooting weddings compared to Nasim (I’ve only done 8) and the D5100 would not be enough for low light settings. Also you want to make sure to have two cameras if possible to get more shots and in case one fails for some reason. Weddings move extremely fast.
Portrait photography is night and day different to a wedding as you don’t get to plan the lighting or poses etc ahead of time. Also I would not recommend the kit lens or the 70-300mm lens in lower light as the f stop would be extremely limiting.
The church and reception are often very tricky as the lighting is low. You will also need at least one good flash and learn to use it (bouncing, using as fill flash, getting the white balance correct and proper metering).
My suggestions:
D7000, D300s or D90 (minimum)
Keep your D40 as a backup
SB710 or SB910 for flash
50mm 1.8D or G
85mm 1.8D (for longer shots)
And practice practice practice with the flash (almost never aim directly at the subject). This takes several months to get comfortable with.
I didn’t mean to scare you but weddings are super unpredictable in speed, weather and lighting and that is what makes them difficult. You have to adjust with it.
Good luck and keep us posted!
Yes I get paid for the sessions, but as a mom of 7 it is not my primary source of income.
So the D40 could not count as a back up? I know its a 6 megapixel, but it still takes fabulous pictures..
The wedding isn’t until November, so I may just keep my 5100 because I’m IN LOVE with how light it is, and save for the d7000…
Good afternoon Kati.
It is not the megapixels but the low light sensitivity of the D40 that is very limiting. The D5100 starts to show grain at about 1,000 iso and the D40 starts showing grain after iso 500. That is a very big difference. In outdoor well lit settings it would be very close. But indoors or in low light settings there would be a huge difference. Even with a flash the D40 would give you tons of grain as you would need to be at over ISO 800 most of the time.
As a backup if the other camera fails I’m sure you would be ok. Make sure you pick up a few of the other lenses and a good flash. The flash will helps wonders.
Also, if you are thinking of eventually picking up the D7000 you might want to jump and get it now. Bestbuy offers 18 months 0 percent financing and you can put the money from the D5100 as a deposit. Your monthly payments would be very low. Just a suggestions as that is what I do.
Also, remember that the heavier (and well balanced) the camera the more stable it becomes.
But up to you. One fast lens and a good flash will help you tons during the wedding. Practice, practice, practice, weddings are not easy.
If you have specific questions feel free to contact me directly and I would be more than happy to help you.
Thanks,
Tom
HELP! I have a few weddings coming up. I know I shouldn’t have taken on so much with the little equipment I have but I’m charging close to nothing and the people who’ve hired me really like my photos. I’m really trying to decide on my next purchase for a lens. I know I need to upgrade my body as well but that will most likely be next year. I have a Nikon D90 with the kit lens 18-105mm as well as a 50mm 1.4g prime lens. What would you suggest I purchase for my next lens? I’m not really a fan of my kit lens and I LOVE the 50mm but i need something better for group shots and zoom. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Rebecca.
Your time and equipment is valuable don’t underprice yourself or you won’t be able to buy the new equipment and will actually lose money.
The D90 is great and I have used it in the past for weddings. Your kit lens is ok when shooting outdoors, but not recommended in lower light.
Recommendations:
35mm 1.8G ($200)
85mm 1.8D ($600)
SB710 or SB910 ( $300+)
For a good regular zoom check out the Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 ($500) If you prefer zooming.
But, what kind of photos have you been taking? Portraits, scenery, parties etc.
Most of all don’t underprice yourself (unless its relatives and they know your skill level). Like lets say you charge $500 for the day and you spend $900 on upgrading your equipment you are negative $400 + all your time editing which could be hours of your time.
Please feel free to e-mail me directly if you have any further questions and I’ll be happy to help. It sounds like you love photography and want to learn.
Good luck!
Hello Nasim,
Glad to see your wonderful article. I am a wedding photographer with
Nikon D7000 with 17-55mm lens and
Nikon D5000 with 50mm lens
I am trying to switch to FX format like D800 which is not available in Canada but I hope I will get it someday :) now I want to ask that in $2000 range, which lens would be better? I can also buy 70-200mm but m bit scared of its size and also its really irritates you when you walk around in wedding crowd with a big lens. As I dont know much about FX bodies and lenses, I seriously need your suggestion. I usually capture Indians and Muslims weddings where some colors are very prominent like red, yellow and Purple so I need a lens which capture colors in its natural state as well as with sharpness. I was thinking about 24-70mm lens, whats your recommendation?
Thanks for your time and yes, I will keep using 50mm for portraits
hi Ibrahim…i did photograph an Indian wedding 2 weeks ago (my first one!)…i brought primes lenses, zoom lenses…but at the end (over the period of this 2 days wedding), i only used a 35mm f/1.8g (for DX) and a 85mm f/1.8d.
i never used the zooms and i am happy with the results ( the couple is really happy and love the photos)
so, if you are using a DX….do buy the 35mm f/1.8G..you will NOT regret it,as far as color rendition.
But, at the end…go with what you feel is best for you and suit your style….NOBODY CAN’T DECIDE FOR YOU..as everyone should have their unique style
if you email me, i can give you the link to the indian wedding photos
my email is artsinfotos@gmail.com
and i do use DX format as well
Hi Christophe,
Thanks for your information. Yes, please show me those pictures. My email address is colonue@live.com
Thanks & regards
Ibrahim
Thank you Christophe :)