Adobe’s Silent Exposure Compensation

When using Lightroom, you might be wondering why the highlight recovery between different camera models allows for different room. Given the “color of light” (light source color temperature and tint) is the same, the highlight recovery difference depends primarily on baseline exposure compensation applied to a raw file when it is opened in Adobe raw converters (Adobe Camera Raw, ACR; or Lightroom, LR). This baseline exposure compensation is applied behind the scenes, the exposure compensation slider after the file is opened stays at zero. This is Adobe’s way to equalize cameras.

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5

The amount of the behind-the-scenes compensation depends on the camera model, ISO setting (it is different for Lo settings), and rendering (if you pick something like Camera Vivid, it may be different). To check the BaselineExposure value, one can download the Adobe DNG converter and convert some test raw files from his camera(s). To see BaselineExposureOffset too, one can just save DNG from ACR or LR with appropriate Camera Profile. Next, download the EXIFTool software and run the converted files through it, like:

exiftool -model -iso -BaselineExposure -BaselineExposureOffset -T *.dng

I put several files through and the results are:

Camera Make and ModelISOBaselineExposureBaselineExposureOffset
Nikon D6001000.35-
Nikon D6101000.35-
Nikon D7002000.5-
Nikon Df1000.25-
Nikon D8001000.35-
Nikon D800E1000.35-
Nikon D32000.5-
Nikon D3S2000-
Nikon D3X50-0.75-
Nikon D3X1000.25-
Nikon D3X2000.25-
Nikon D41000.25-

As you can see, using the Adobe Standard process, the number for BaselineExposureOffset is at zero (if it is present for your camera, add it to BaselineExposure).

From the table above, you can see that for Nikon D3X at ISO 50 (Lo setting) 0.75 EV (stops) is subtracted, making the image “darker”, while for ISO 100 0.25 EV is added, making it “brighter”. You can also see that the compensation (and thus the room for “highlight recovery”) differs between the D3 and the D4 by 1/4 EV, more “room” for the D3. The difference between the D3 and the D3S is 1/2 EV, favoring in this respect the D3; however in fact it means that the D3S exposure is already hotter, adding to less noise.


Support Photography Life!

We constantly work hard on adding unique content, gear reviews and up-to-date photography news, in addition to continuously expanding the site with new sections and useful content. However, we need your continuous support to deliver the best content and allow our website to expand its reach. If you would like to help us out, please consider purchasing gear from our links to our trusted partners like B&H Photo Video and Adorama. It won't cost you anything, but it will help us pay our contributors, hosting and other expenses to run this website. In addition, if you feel like we do a good job, you can pledge one-time or monthly. We do not run any advertising at Photography Life to keep it clean for your viewing pleasure, so your support is extremely important for us to keep it that way.

Please see the Support Us page for our partner links and a donation form. Also, don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter!
Avatar of Iliah Borg About Iliah Borg

Iliah Borg has been involved in photography since the age of 6. His Father and his grandfather were professional photographers. He is the co-author of the RawDigger software, a RAW image analysis tool.

Comments

  1. Interesting. This might explain why Adobe Standard looks overexposed to me for night photography and Camera Neutral does not with my D700. Also, I occasionally get color banding with some camera profiles if I’m not careful on night skies.

  2. 2
    ) Cristian Arghius

    Very interesting, thanks for the info!

  3. the guys that did RawPhotoProcessor (RPP) pointed out this type of compensation a while back. this is what makes RPP sometimes better at recovering highlights where ACR fails.

    • Dear Michael,

      Being one of those two guys, I know it ;)

  4. Over the Christmas holidays, I decided to convert my CR2 files to DNG. I did not realize the chore that would be since I have over 300,000 photos in my digital folders. It took a couple of weeks, around the clock, using Adobe’s DNG Converter, but I accomplished the task. I now have a few extra terabytes of computer space.

    The one thing I noticed as I was deleting the CR2 files (wish DNG Converter had an “automatically delete CR2 files” button) is that the DNG files were lighter than the corresponding CR2 files. At first it confused me because a RAW file was a RAW file, right? Then I thought that if the DNG file was about 75-80% the size of the CR2 file, then Adobe must be throwing data away, which is why the files were lighter and smaller.

    I went back to Photoshop CC and post-processed both files identically. I got the same result, which I also thought was interesting. But with the experiential evidence that my work would be the same with the DNG files, I proceeded to delete all the CR2 files.

    Now, after reading your post, I understand the difference. Knowledge acquired…. Thanks!

    • Dear Russel,

      One of the many reasons not to delete original CR2 files is that Canon DPP does not process DNG format. Please consider keeping the originals. It is a good practice.

      • Too late! They all went bye-bye two weeks ago. I don’t like DPP. Never did. I’m a Photoshop guy, even to the extent that I’m making Photoshop take over all my previous work in Photo-Paint, PaintShop Pro, and CorelDraw.

        • Dear Russel,

          Never say “never” ;) – who knows, maybe at some point something will change and you will need DPP. But generally, a slight bug in the dng converter may ruin your photos. Why not to keep original shots too?

  5. Nope. They are outta here! And the first thing I do when I come in from the field each day is convert all my CR2 files to DNG files. Adobe’s DNG Converter makes it fast and painless, except for deleting all those CR2 files, but a resort of the directory makes that easy, too.

Leave a Comment

*